Go to Post "What we really need to make sure we do is make our robot move." - Barngirl425 [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > Regional Competitions
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-03-2003, 00:01
CaseyG668 CaseyG668 is offline
Registered User
#0668 (The Apes Of Wrath)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: San Jose, Calif
Posts: 5
CaseyG668 is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via ICQ to CaseyG668 Send a message via AIM to CaseyG668
Unhappy Non - GP-ism at SVR

I've been in FIRST for three years, since the start of my team in 2001. I won't say I've seen it all, I don't think anyone can. The past two years, our team went to SVR and Nationals last year (which was absolutely fantastic!), and I've always had a wonderful time, and come back to this "reality" thing grinning and cheerful.

This year, though, seems to be a little different. Maybe it's just the game that's got me jaded; it doesn't seem to inspire as much goodwill between teams as the past two games have, and I don't really like that there's so little strategizing you can really do ahead of time - the rule of thumb for this game seems to be whoever can knock the most boxes from the ramp onto their side generally wins. Maybe it's all the stuff that happened during the six weeks, with the motor specs coming so terribly late, trying to create a whole new drive train, not to mention normal team dynamics. But my own little theory is that over the years, the fundamental ideals of FIRST, the teamwork and gracous professionalism, the learning, wonder and excitement of this opportunity, they've lessened to a degree where it's stopped being fun for some people.

Today at SVR, I was watching a match that my team was playing in. A robot on the other alliance flipped our partner, and while our two team's spectators gasped and tried to make sure the robot was alright, the team who's robot had flipped our partners' started yelling and cheering even louder. Now, I don't know *why* they were cheering, maybe it was for something their partner had done. But I was completely disgusted with their behavior.

I've heard from other people their stories of the loss of gracious professionalism, horror stories that make you wonder how they could have happened in a place like this. Others have spoken of the "gentlemen's agreements" that have been going on this year, their experiences with the lack of GP. Guess I've added myself to their ranks. I just wish I could say I was the last one.

- Casey Greene
<Casey668>
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-03-2003, 00:06
Rob Colatutto's Avatar
Rob Colatutto Rob Colatutto is offline
Roboticsrob
FTC #10092 (Green.Griffins;)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 849
Rob Colatutto is a splendid one to beholdRob Colatutto is a splendid one to beholdRob Colatutto is a splendid one to beholdRob Colatutto is a splendid one to beholdRob Colatutto is a splendid one to beholdRob Colatutto is a splendid one to beholdRob Colatutto is a splendid one to behold
Re: Non - GP-ism at SVR

Quote:
Originally posted by kymtilani
trying to create a whole new drive train
- Casey Greene
<Casey668>
we always make an entirely new drive train in the 6 weeks.

but yeah, the rest of this has been discussed before in a few posts, search around for them
__________________
Follow me on twitter @roboticsrob and my FTC team @griffins10092
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-03-2003, 00:48
CaseyG668 CaseyG668 is offline
Registered User
#0668 (The Apes Of Wrath)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: San Jose, Calif
Posts: 5
CaseyG668 is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via ICQ to CaseyG668 Send a message via AIM to CaseyG668
Terribly, terribly sorry. What I meant by the drive train was that we had a two-motor chain drive for the past two years, and this year we had four motors and independent wheels. Terribly sorry for any confusion it may have caused you, or may cause others in the future.

- Casey
__________________
<Casey668>
668 r0x0r$ j00r $0x0r$!!
Hehe, we topple j00r 80x0r$ too
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-03-2003, 22:17
srjjs's Avatar
srjjs srjjs is offline
Slightly Rehabilitated
AKA: Larry Wang
#0840 (Aragon Robotics Team)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: UCB, Berkeley
Posts: 485
srjjs will become famous soon enough
Send a message via AIM to srjjs
Their behavior, though perhaps not morally correct, is certainly understandable.
When one robot flips another, it is just a part of the game. It shows the superiority of one robot over another in one of the most fundamental aspects of the robot that appears in almost every game:stability.

If one team is happy because of the demonstration of their robot's stability and power, why shouldn't they cheer?

If any complaints about cheering were to be made, I would have complained that there was not enough of it, not that there was too much.
__________________
2004:
SVR Imagery Award
SVR Semifinalists with 473 and 687

RIP Andrew Dang
3/22/2004
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-03-2003, 23:21
DougHogg DougHogg is offline
Robot-A-Holic
FRC #0980 (The ThunderBots)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: S. California
Posts: 324
DougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally posted by srjjs
Their behavior, though perhaps not morally correct, is certainly understandable.
When one robot flips another, it is just a part of the game. It shows the superiority of one robot over another in one of the most fundamental aspects of the robot that appears in almost every game:stability.

If one team is happy because of the demonstration of their robot's stability and power, why shouldn't they cheer?

If any complaints about cheering were to be made, I would have complained that there was not enough of it, not that there was too much.
I think cheering is fine by and large, but sometimes it's inappropriate. What if two race cars were going down the track and one flipped and lit on fire. Probably the other team wouldn't cheer, even if it meant they were going to win. True, that's an extreme case to illustrate the point.

I guess the point is that it is against the rules to flip another robot intentionally, and the other team is liable to feel a little bad about that happening to their robot, so cheering would be a little insensitive. Comments like, "Whoa", "wow" or "holy cow" might be appropriate, but loud cheering right at that point, especially if the robot is a bit top heavy or having some kind of problem, seems a little like rubbing salt in the wounds. Now if it wasn't illegal to tip robots intentionally, maybe it wouldn't be as annoying.

It also depends on whose robot you just tipped. Have they been cheering loudly every time they bashed into your robot? Then go for it. Are they a stacker robot, trying to put some bins up and you just rammed them and knocked them over? Nah, I don't think we want to cheer too loud about that.

I think the idea is to have some consideration for the feelings of the other team members. Of course, it is a contest and people do get excited at contests. It would just be nice if everyone cared about the other people enough to think about what effect they are having on them. Certainly when teams help other teams before the match, that is showing that they care.

As to the agreements that have been occurring, unfortunately the current rules "celebrate" (by which I mean "reward") that practice, so it is liable to crop up until the rules get changed. Same problem really I think--caring more about winning than about the overall effect that one is causing. I have seen people pretty saddened by the results, saying such matches are boring, lacking in spirit, etc. (Some regionals seem to have avoided this all together, so it is possible, and if anyone knows how it was avoided, I would love to know.)

However, I think the post season forums for team discussion will be quite lively this year. And I bet there are some positive changes for next year. (There will be if I have anything to say about it.)

:-)
__________________
FIRST Team 980, The ThunderBots
2002: S. California Rookie All Stars
2004: S. California: Regional Champion,
Championship Event: Galileo 2nd seed,
IRI: Competition Winner, Cal Games: Competition Winner
2005: Arizona: 1st seed
Silicon Valley: Regional Champion (Thanks Teams 254 and 22)
S. California: Regional Runners Up (Thanks Teams 22 and 968)

Last edited by DougHogg : 29-03-2003 at 23:36.
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 30-03-2003, 04:02
Unsung FIRST Hero
Bill Gold Bill Gold is offline
Retired -- 2006
no team
 
Join Date: May 2001
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: USA
Posts: 837
Bill Gold has a reputation beyond reputeBill Gold has a reputation beyond reputeBill Gold has a reputation beyond reputeBill Gold has a reputation beyond reputeBill Gold has a reputation beyond reputeBill Gold has a reputation beyond reputeBill Gold has a reputation beyond reputeBill Gold has a reputation beyond reputeBill Gold has a reputation beyond reputeBill Gold has a reputation beyond reputeBill Gold has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Non - GP-ism at SVR

Quote:
Originally posted by kymtilani
I've been in FIRST for three years, since the start of my team in 2001. I won't say I've seen it all, I don't think anyone can. The past two years, our team went to SVR and Nationals last year (which was absolutely fantastic!), and I've always had a wonderful time, and come back to this "reality" thing grinning and cheerful.

This year, though, seems to be a little different. Maybe it's just the game that's got me jaded; it doesn't seem to inspire as much goodwill between teams as the past two games have, and I don't really like that there's so little strategizing you can really do ahead of time - the rule of thumb for this game seems to be whoever can knock the most boxes from the ramp onto their side generally wins. Maybe it's all the stuff that happened during the six weeks, with the motor specs coming so terribly late, trying to create a whole new drive train, not to mention normal team dynamics. But my own little theory is that over the years, the fundamental ideals of FIRST, the teamwork and gracous professionalism, the learning, wonder and excitement of this opportunity, they've lessened to a degree where it's stopped being fun for some people.

Today at SVR, I was watching a match that my team was playing in. A robot on the other alliance flipped our partner, and while our two team's spectators gasped and tried to make sure the robot was alright, the team who's robot had flipped our partners' started yelling and cheering even louder. Now, I don't know *why* they were cheering, maybe it was for something their partner had done. But I was completely disgusted with their behavior.

I've heard from other people their stories of the loss of gracious professionalism, horror stories that make you wonder how they could have happened in a place like this. Others have spoken of the "gentlemen's agreements" that have been going on this year, their experiences with the lack of GP. Guess I've added myself to their ranks. I just wish I could say I was the last one.

- Casey Greene
<Casey668>
This is a non-issue. I didn't see the match, but if I was on the team against you I'd be cheering, too. Don't think that if one of your opponents was somehow disabled or a no show you wouldn't be extatic at the chance your team could rack up tons of points. It sucks your alliance had a robot that flipped over, but it's all part of the game.

I disagree with the comparison of the FIRST RC to the NASCAR fire scenario. In NASCAR you're dealing with peoples' lives at stake, and in FIRST it's just your robot. Yeah, to some of us our robot is our lives, many people on these boards can tell you I feel that way about my robots. If your robot gets flipped over, it doesn't necessarily mean it's damaged. Even if it is damaged, it's not the end of your life. FIRST is a wonderful distraction from the real world which is pretty successful at roping in kids to technical futures. It's not the only thing that's important in life. You've got to let things go. I've had a tough time with this, but this year and last year I've come a long way to recognizing this as a game and nothing more.

Getting back to robots tipping and being flipped... It's either a design flaw on your partner's part (high CG) or something else which could have been avoided. What I'm trying to say (with less than 12 hours of sleep over 3 days) is that you ought to concern yourself with convincing your own team to not be careless in your design or driving so that you don't tip over. You can't do anything about the other robots. There's no magic wand you can wave to make your partner be a better robot or a more complimentary robot. Roll with the punches life (and FIRST) throws at you. If you don't, you'll never be happy. Don't make life so rigid and serious, you'll never make it out alive.

There's my more than half asleep $0.02
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 30-03-2003, 04:23
Cory's Avatar
Cory Cory is offline
Registered User
AKA: Cory McBride
FRC #0254 (The Cheesy Poofs)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 6,825
Cory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Cory
Re: Re: Non - GP-ism at SVR

Quote:
Originally posted by Bill Gold
Getting back to robots tipping and being flipped... It's either a design flaw on your partner's part (high CG) or something else which could have been avoided. What I'm trying to say (with less than 12 hours of sleep over 3 days) is that you ought to concern yourself with convincing your own team to not be careless in your design or driving so that you don't tip over. You can't do anything about the other robots. There's no magic wand you can wave to make your partner be a better robot or a more complimentary robot. Roll with the punches life (and FIRST) throws at you. If you don't, you'll never be happy. Don't make life so rigid and serious, you'll never make it out alive.

There's my more than half asleep $0.02
Totally agreed Bill. as anyone who watched us at SVR can tell you, we had severe flipping issues. As they can also tell you, we are about 12" high, with most weight under 9". The problem is our lack of weight. After removing all of our useless stuff, we were sitting at 75ish lbs, way too light. We didnt do anything to remedy the situation until the end of the day, because we thought it was some freak situation, but by that time, it was too late, and we were in 45th place. We were going to add a Lead brick this morning, but I guess that never found its way to our pits. Most of it was driver error. You cannot continue to drive forward when being tipped, you also cannot sit there and let yourself be tipped by a wedgebot. Oh well...the robot sucked, but who cares? I still had a ton of fun.

Cory
__________________
2001-2004: Team 100
2006-Present: Team 254
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 30-03-2003, 04:59
DougHogg DougHogg is offline
Robot-A-Holic
FRC #0980 (The ThunderBots)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: S. California
Posts: 324
DougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud of
Non - GP-ism at SVR

Quote:
Originally posted by Bill Gold
Don't think that if one of your opponents was somehow disabled or a no show you wouldn't be extatic at the chance your team could rack up tons of points.
I see what you are saying. However I personally wouldn't be ecstatic about that. Imagine that through some massive fluke, an opponent no shows in every match, so your team winds up the winner and gets a trophy. Would you feel great? I doubt it. I certainly wouldn't because I would know that our team didn't really do anything to earn it. When I go to a FIRST competition, among other things such teaching our students to use their knowledge, meeting friends and admiring each others robots, I go to compete, and that means that I need opponents. I just want opponents that will abide by the rules, so its fair and honorable. Some tipping is going to occur, but deliberate tipping is against the rules. Also I don't think it is unreasonable to hope that teams will indicate that they aren't deliberately tipping other robots, by showing some concern. (True, we won't die if they don't.)

Quote:
Originally posted by Bill Gold
Getting back to robots tipping and being flipped... It's either a design flaw on your partner's part (high CG) or something else which could have been avoided.
Well I agree with you. Most of the time, a team whose robot tips should just take responsibility for the fact that it happened, due to design, driving, etc. But sometimes, another team has a robot flipping cow catcher or they just went too far by ramming a robot really hard that would obviously tip because of being off balance, and then I would say something about it, because that is part of being responsible also: communicating when something is out of line.

Yes, you are right, FIRST is not in a life and death struggle, but we are trying to change the world. That's pretty important, and the game is helping us do that. So I guess the game matters to that extent.

Anyway, I like this game. I don't see anything wrong with wanting to keep it friendly.
__________________
FIRST Team 980, The ThunderBots
2002: S. California Rookie All Stars
2004: S. California: Regional Champion,
Championship Event: Galileo 2nd seed,
IRI: Competition Winner, Cal Games: Competition Winner
2005: Arizona: 1st seed
Silicon Valley: Regional Champion (Thanks Teams 254 and 22)
S. California: Regional Runners Up (Thanks Teams 22 and 968)
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 30-03-2003, 08:38
T967's Avatar
T967 T967 is offline
5 IA teams, WHOs w/me?
AKA: Seth F.
no team
Team Role: Student
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Marion, Iowa
Posts: 241
T967 is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to T967
well..

Flipping in general is an odd thing. For example if you were to hit a robot on the ramp to try and get 25 points, and it flipped over, teams cheer. But when ever a robot gets back up, I see those same teams cheering even louder. I know I did both.
Quote:
the rule of thumb for this game seems to be whoever can knock the most boxes from the ramp onto their side generally wins.
So is stacking last time I checked, MOE won a finals round stacking. Lack of stratedgy? HOW? Stacks give me more headaches then balls in a goal. Getting the KOH points is also essential and has caused many new and interesting design concepts. I think maybe all this loss of gp stuff is due more to the less rescricting robot contact rules. 4 years ago you could hardly touch another robot, Now just about anything goes. But isn't that what our kind of robots do? (I'm talkin' the rover explorer kind. another whole discussion.) Gp isn't being lost, the game is just more exciting. that's why so many cheer. Compitition is like that.
As for the pre-arranged matches, they disgust me. Not only non-gp like; But in any other compititions, it's illegal.
__________________
Old dude wondering if he can really get back into this crazy thing called FIRST.
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 30-03-2003, 18:33
srjjs's Avatar
srjjs srjjs is offline
Slightly Rehabilitated
AKA: Larry Wang
#0840 (Aragon Robotics Team)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: UCB, Berkeley
Posts: 485
srjjs will become famous soon enough
Send a message via AIM to srjjs
I think a better parallel than the NASCAR racing can be found within the game itself.
A closer example would be in autonomous mode. If your robot reaches the top of the ramp and knocks down the wall before your opponent, should you cheer? That can certainly be interpreted as a failure of your opponent's robot, but that does not mean that it is any less a success of yours.
__________________
2004:
SVR Imagery Award
SVR Semifinalists with 473 and 687

RIP Andrew Dang
3/22/2004
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 30-03-2003, 19:24
tonyargote's Avatar
tonyargote tonyargote is offline
Registered User
#0059 (RamTech 59)
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 70
tonyargote is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via AIM to tonyargote Send a message via Yahoo to tonyargote
I believe that this is a matter of perspective. I can see someone getting mad because their robot flipped (specially if its early in the game) and their left motionless, but by the same token, that is a strategy that might have been calculated. If you know that your opponents robot is extremely good, and their only weakness is the fact that they flip, or can be flipped easily, and your at a disadvantgage, you'd probably use it. I know that in one of our matches at UCF, we where flipped by swamp thing because they where blocking the ramp, and we where trying to get through, and we got MAD. But when their team cheered, we understood, because that is the strategy/move they choose, and they executed it perfectly. I'm nbot supporting the use of "battlebots" in a FIRST competition, but if you get flipped, you have to agree "that's pretty darn cool"
__________________
TArgote
Driver, Programmer, Webmaster
www.RamTech59.com

UCF: Ranked 13th (2nd Highest QP's in the Nation! (349))
Championship: Ranked 12 out of 73 teams in Archimedes Division, Quater finalist allied with 1108 (GO 1108!) & 868 ( GO 868!)
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 31-03-2003, 01:33
DougHogg DougHogg is offline
Robot-A-Holic
FRC #0980 (The ThunderBots)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: S. California
Posts: 324
DougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally posted by srjjs
I think a better parallel than the NASCAR racing can be found within the game itself.
A closer example would be in autonomous mode. If your robot reaches the top of the ramp and knocks down the wall before your opponent, should you cheer? That can certainly be interpreted as a failure of your opponent's robot, but that does not mean that it is any less a success of yours.
I agree that a NASCAR racing car flipping doesn't parallel someone flipping your robot. After all, we don't ride in our robots. I was just trying to illustrate with a very extreme case, that sometimes it isn't appropriate to cheer when something bad happens to your opponent, even if that event means that you are going to win.

Also you are right. We can all get too sensitive to things like people cheering when they beat us to the stack. That is meant to be part of the game.

My only point about flipping robots is that it is against the rules to flip a robot on purpose, so if we do flip someone, maybe we shouldn't cheer too loudly about it, since if it happens enough times, the referees may decide that we are doing it on purpose and disqualify us. Also hopefully teams aren't employing tactics that they know will flip other robots "accidentally on purpose".

Other than that, if it happens, it happens. It does add a certain amount of drama to the game when a robot goes over. Maybe in future years, we will all pay more attention to having self-righting robots--a cool ability I wish we had.

(Our robot is 5 feet high this year, but so far we haven't tipped. I hope it stays that way.)
__________________
FIRST Team 980, The ThunderBots
2002: S. California Rookie All Stars
2004: S. California: Regional Champion,
Championship Event: Galileo 2nd seed,
IRI: Competition Winner, Cal Games: Competition Winner
2005: Arizona: 1st seed
Silicon Valley: Regional Champion (Thanks Teams 254 and 22)
S. California: Regional Runners Up (Thanks Teams 22 and 968)

Last edited by DougHogg : 31-03-2003 at 01:38.
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 31-03-2003, 09:37
Dr.Bot
 
Posts: n/a
I think the GP level at SVR was extremely high - Our team was in a quarter final match where both our robot and the robot of our mentor team (opponent) both got flipped - in both cases due to teams trying hard to win, not teams trying to intentionally disable opponents. Also it was pretty easy to get flipped if you have two robots both going up the ramp at the same time, and I am surprised there wasn't more carnage!

The line between fierce competition and mean sprited competition may be very fine, but I did not see it being crossed at SVR.
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 31-03-2003, 16:18
Blaster Blaster is offline
Registered User
#0972 (Iron Paw)
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Los Gatos
Posts: 2
Blaster is an unknown quantity at this point
Unhappy I agree

I have to agree, mainly because we were the one that got flipped over!!!

There is a good side to this though. After the match the whole team came over to apologize to us.
__________________
Computer are like air conditioners, they stop working when you open up windows.
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 31-03-2003, 17:13
DougHogg DougHogg is offline
Robot-A-Holic
FRC #0980 (The ThunderBots)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: S. California
Posts: 324
DougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally posted by Dr.Bot
I think the GP level at SVR was extremely high - Our team was in a quarter final match where both our robot and the robot of our mentor team (opponent) both got flipped - in both cases due to teams trying hard to win, not teams trying to intentionally disable opponents. Also it was pretty easy to get flipped if you have two robots both going up the ramp at the same time, and I am surprised there wasn't more carnage!

The line between fierce competition and mean sprited competition may be very fine, but I did not see it being crossed at SVR.
Quote:
Originally posted by Blaster
Re: I agree

I have to agree, mainly because we were the one that got flipped over!!!

There is a good side to this though. After the match the whole team came over to apologize to us.
Wow! Even if gracious professionalism possibly slipped briefly, it certainly sounds like it prevailed in Silicon Valley.

Congratulations.

We will have to try to do as well in S. Calif. this week.
__________________
FIRST Team 980, The ThunderBots
2002: S. California Rookie All Stars
2004: S. California: Regional Champion,
Championship Event: Galileo 2nd seed,
IRI: Competition Winner, Cal Games: Competition Winner
2005: Arizona: 1st seed
Silicon Valley: Regional Champion (Thanks Teams 254 and 22)
S. California: Regional Runners Up (Thanks Teams 22 and 968)

Last edited by DougHogg : 31-03-2003 at 17:22.
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Thanks to 115 & 852 SVR Champions Dennis Jenks Thanks and/or Congrats 3 09-04-2003 00:12
Svr... Wetzel Regional Competitions 77 08-04-2003 13:01
No Collusion at SVR Patrick Wang Regional Competitions 14 31-03-2003 23:57
Internet Connection at SVR? mrobrien Regional Competitions 0 25-03-2003 15:01
Team Social at SVR? AlbertW Regional Competitions 0 12-03-2003 01:47


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:32.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi