|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: To prevent rigged matches, would you like FIRST to set tiebrakers? | |||
| Yes. |
|
23 | 44.23% |
| No. |
|
19 | 36.54% |
| I don't care. |
|
10 | 19.23% |
| Voters: 52. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
If you use this strategy you decide that the best strategy is not to go after your competition but to work together and share the victory. I don't understand how that isn't gracious professionalism. It may not be pleasing to the spectators but it seems to embody the spirit of FIRST in every way.
In many occasions cooperation is better for everyone than competition: some scenarios 1) Red 50 Blue 10 = Red 70 QP's = Blue 10 QP's Red 50 Blue 50 = Red 100 QPs Blue 100 QPs in this case both alliances would want to tie Originally I thought using this idea in every match, after some thinking I now feel thats a bad idea, this should simply be part of the playbook, and since (in my mind anyway) it does not violate the spirit of FIRST, but rather encourages it, I see no reason to enact rules prohibitting this style of play. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Thanks 968 and 294 and last match LA | sanddrag | Regional Competitions | 5 | 16-04-2003 17:15 |
| How should FIRST Replay a match | Matt Reiland | Rules/Strategy | 4 | 09-03-2003 11:11 |
| Sound Levels Measured at the Nationals | archiver | 1999 | 8 | 23-06-2002 22:47 |
| Thanks - Wild Stang - What a match!!!!!! | archiver | 1999 | 1 | 23-06-2002 22:15 |
| Avg Score | CMC | General Forum | 14 | 12-03-2002 07:23 |