Go to Post Without compromise, engineering would be boring. - Mike Betts [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Programming
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #40   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 25-08-2003, 08:18
Raven_Writer's Avatar
Raven_Writer Raven_Writer is offline
2004 Detroit & Pittsburgh Winners
AKA: Eric Hansen
FRC #0005 (RoboCards)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Melvindale
Posts: 1,549
Raven_Writer is just really niceRaven_Writer is just really niceRaven_Writer is just really niceRaven_Writer is just really niceRaven_Writer is just really nice
Send a message via ICQ to Raven_Writer Send a message via AIM to Raven_Writer Send a message via MSN to Raven_Writer Send a message via Yahoo to Raven_Writer
Quote:
Originally posted by rwaliany
Ah, yes obviously java is slower. But the javelin stamp processes 8000 commands per second apparently (parallax.com). I think that would be sufficient enough for what we need. Well, I wouldn't consider C++ simplier. I would rank level of difficulty from C to C++ to Java being the easiest. C'mon to go to the next pointer in java isn't it like list.nextPtr();. Also, you might not realize how much actual support parallax has for the javelin stamp, in documentation, function lists with examples and descriptions parsed nicely, and several examples. It's actually pretty nice. It all depends how the code is stored and processed, they could compile the java code or not. I haven't read up enough on the javelin stamp to tell you.
There is also a lot of documentation on the BASIC stamp and PBASIC language.
Quote:
Originally posted by Matt Leese
In a somewhat related topic, I got to see the field control set that's going to be used next year the other day (IFI gave us a set for use at the Maryland State Fair Competition). Basically, they seem to look exactly like the field control components from 2003 (from the outside at least). They do support autonomous mode and they do support previous year's controllers. This may mean that there are only superficial changes to them. If anyone's really interested I may take some pictures of them and post them. You really can't tell much from just looking at it however.

Matt
I'd love to see some pictures of the controllers.
__________________
AIM: wisprmylastbreth
EMail: nightskywriter@gmail.com
Y!: synsoflife

"ai yoru ga" -- "Love the nights"

Last edited by Raven_Writer : 25-08-2003 at 08:20.
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What is your most prefered programming language? Hailfire Programming 156 19-01-2005 21:42
2004 Championship Eligibility Criteria!!! dez250 General Forum 214 28-12-2003 20:11
Championship Qualification - How you would've done it Ken Leung Championship Event 6 26-10-2003 14:00
Making heads or tails of the new announcement... Jessica Boucher General Forum 66 26-09-2001 11:13
TI programming using Z80 assembly language Jeff Wong Chit-Chat 1 07-06-2001 01:27


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 16:57.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi