Go to Post Advances in STEM are meant to benefit everyone, so even the most basic-level of understanding deserves to be validated and encouraged. - moamomen [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  #46   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-09-2003, 11:45
Ryan Dognaux's Avatar
Ryan Dognaux Ryan Dognaux is offline
Back Home in Indiana
FRC #4329 (Lutheran Roboteers)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 2,675
Ryan Dognaux has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Dognaux has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Dognaux has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Dognaux has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Dognaux has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Dognaux has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Dognaux has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Dognaux has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Dognaux has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Dognaux has a reputation beyond reputeRyan Dognaux has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Ryan Dognaux
I'm going to elaborate too much on what I think would be a good alternative to the Even/Odd system, but here's what I would like to see as a good alternative.

As I read through these I realized my idea was close to Andy Baker's. FIRST is much more than the robots, but we are here because of them! Now I'm not denying that teams that win the extra awards such as animation, inventor, etc. shouldn't get benefits and be allowed to go to Nats because they should, but we can't exclude the robots here people. I like the idea of large Qualifying Regionals (for example, the Midwest would have a big Qualifying Regional) , which would then put you into the National Competition. Although it's not the most fair alternative, there are so many teams that it's hard to be truly fair to all teams. In addition to these large Qualifying Regionals, teams could also qualify for Nationals through a point system like the current one which includes all the awards like Chairmans, Animation, Robot Design Awards, etc.

That's my .02 cents.
__________________
Ryan Dognaux :: Last Name Pronounced 'Doane Yo'
Team 234 Alum: 2002 - 2005 :: Purdue FIRST Member: 2006 - 2009
Team 1646 Mentor: 2007 - 2009 :: Team 357 Mentor: 2009 - 2012
Team 4329 Mentor: Current
STL Off-Season Event: www.gatewayroboticschallenge.com
Reply With Quote
  #47   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-09-2003, 12:07
Jeremy J's Avatar
Jeremy J Jeremy J is offline
Registered User
#0871 (West Islip Robotechs)
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: West Islip, NY
Posts: 10
Jeremy J is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via ICQ to Jeremy J Send a message via AIM to Jeremy J Send a message via Yahoo to Jeremy J
I don't know if this has been stated before, so here goes my idea for how teams should qualify

1) Those that exemplify the ideals of FIRST go. No exceptions.
2) All awards are offered a spot at nationals.
3) Rookie teams get a small percentage of the spots open at Nationals.
4) Finally, competitiveness gets the last spot as who can go. Those teams that win get the final spots not taken by #1 and #2.

I know that the competitiveness is a big part of the nationals, but then again, as has been said before, FIRST is not about the robots. It's about the atmosphere. The main purpose is inspiration. Not competition. I don't know how flawed, or even if it is, the system above is. It's just how I feel they should do things. If they want a real competitive event, have another national event, but just for the best teams from all over. It would be nice if everyone could go, but that's impossible. If they want competitive events, make a special one just for that, for the best teams to go to, but then make the current nationals for the ideals of FIRST. Make it a learning experience, and have a seperate "Super Bowl" event.
__________________
"...at about this time, somebody will be telling you to get on the plane, on the plane, on the plane. I say **** you, I'm getting IN the plane!" - George Carlin
-2002 Rookie All-Star
-2003 LI Regional 2nd place
Reply With Quote
  #48   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-09-2003, 15:15
Eric O's Avatar
Eric O Eric O is offline
*
AKA: Eric O'Brien
FRC #0177 (Bobcat Robotics)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2001
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: South Windsor, CT
Posts: 144
Eric O has a reputation beyond reputeEric O has a reputation beyond reputeEric O has a reputation beyond reputeEric O has a reputation beyond reputeEric O has a reputation beyond reputeEric O has a reputation beyond reputeEric O has a reputation beyond reputeEric O has a reputation beyond reputeEric O has a reputation beyond reputeEric O has a reputation beyond reputeEric O has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Eric O Send a message via Yahoo to Eric O
My thoughts

In 2000, as a junior in high school I attended the Nationals for the first time. At regionals that year I knew I would be back for my senior year, at nationals I was hooked for life.

FIRST is about the inspiration and the Championship does just that. I feel that every student should have a chance to go to the championship with their team at some point in their high school career. Therefore, teams should be able to go every x years (less than 4) regardless of the team’s performance.

Other criteria that is important:
1) Teams that perform well at regionals during the current year should be able to attend.
2) Teams that win current year regional awards that would assist in inspiring students at the championship. (example: teams that win spirit usually encourage more enthusiasm from everyone at the event, making it more enjoyable)
3) Teams that performed well previous years. Teams should have a chance to come back to the championship to defend their titles.

Overall the Championship should include the teams that will have the greatest impact on the students that will attend. And the teams that have the students that need to be inspired.

Eric
Reply With Quote
  #49   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-09-2003, 11:48
Unsung FIRST Hero
JVN JVN is offline
@JohnVNeun
AKA: John Vielkind-Neun
FRC #0148 (Robowranglers)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2001
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Greenville, Tx
Posts: 3,159
JVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Championship

Quote:
Originally posted by Mike Martus
Everyone will not be happy and if a change comes about this year.
But is it really possible to go ahead with the old system?
Someone (wiser than me), pointed out that we have already expanded beyond the odd/even system.

After qualifications, there will be about 200-250 spots open for even teams. But, think how many teams there are to fill these spots (I don't have the exact numbers.)

In the future, it will get worse.

I believe that FIRST should keep with the "some teams qualify, some teams get a free ride" system. The big question is, how should the "free ride" system work? I agree with what Eric O posted above, every team should get a chance to go, even if it takes 4 (or more) years for their "free ride".

Perhaps, FIRST should keep track of how long it has been since a team attended nationals. Those teams that haven't gone in the greatest amount of time, get a "free ride". It might start taking quite a few years to cycle through the teams, but by then, hopefully we will have "super-regionals" or even East/West divisions, or something along those lines. This solution will work for at least, the next 3 years. (until post-Atlanta).


FIRST should do whatever it can to ensure that nationals remains competitive (the BEST robots go each year), and that even the "not best" teams get the chance to attend every few years...


I trust that FIRST will come up with the best solution for doing this, but I feel it is important that this happens. (Dave asked for opinions, this is mine.)

This means that the system for determining what teams are the "best" needs to be reexamined. What awards cause a team to qualify. Do we really want "historical" performance to allow for qualification? *shrug* Again, I don't have the answers, but I trust those "powers that be" at FIRST will be able to figure things out.

Dave, Good Luck.



John
__________________
In the interest of full disclosure: I work for VEX Robotics a subsidiary of Innovation First International (IFI) Crown Supplier & Proud Supporter of FIRST
Reply With Quote
  #50   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-09-2003, 12:30
KathieK's Avatar Unsung FIRST Hero
KathieK KathieK is offline
Sometimes FIRST makes my head hurt!
no team
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Rockville, CT
Posts: 3,681
KathieK has a reputation beyond reputeKathieK has a reputation beyond reputeKathieK has a reputation beyond reputeKathieK has a reputation beyond reputeKathieK has a reputation beyond reputeKathieK has a reputation beyond reputeKathieK has a reputation beyond reputeKathieK has a reputation beyond reputeKathieK has a reputation beyond reputeKathieK has a reputation beyond reputeKathieK has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to KathieK
Odd/Even

Since we all agree that part of the excitement about the Championship event is the competion, and part is the networking and collaboration between teams, why not offer a solution like this?

Do not base the even/odd stipulation on team numbers, but rather, hold a lottery during the spring for the following year. (That way teams have lots of time to plan AND you will not always be competing at Championships with the same odd- or -even-numbered teams).

During the Odd years, teams who received an odd number during the lottery can qualify to attend the Championship event where they will compete against other teams who received Odd numbers. During that same year, Even teams can qualify to attend a "conference" with other Even teams where they can attend workshops, demonstrations and network (party) with other teams.

This way, each year a team will have an opportunity to either qualify for the Conference or the Championships.
Reply With Quote
  #51   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-09-2003, 12:59
Dr.Bot
 
Posts: n/a
Fairness.

I don't like odd/even - you may not have the
'best' robot when your number comes up. You also need a lot of lead time to schedule and fund a national run - I have been in a situation where my team qualified at the last minute to attend the nationals - but even with the $$$ just did not have enough time to organize the trip. So the trick is how to have a 'fair' system that doesn't favor wealthy teams over poor teams. I think
A random lottery together with a merrit system would work.
Reply With Quote
  #52   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-09-2003, 13:15
Unsung FIRST Hero
Warren Boudreau Warren Boudreau is offline
Registered User
FRC #0180 (Team SPAM)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Stuart, FL
Posts: 354
Warren Boudreau has a reputation beyond reputeWarren Boudreau has a reputation beyond reputeWarren Boudreau has a reputation beyond reputeWarren Boudreau has a reputation beyond reputeWarren Boudreau has a reputation beyond reputeWarren Boudreau has a reputation beyond reputeWarren Boudreau has a reputation beyond reputeWarren Boudreau has a reputation beyond reputeWarren Boudreau has a reputation beyond reputeWarren Boudreau has a reputation beyond reputeWarren Boudreau has a reputation beyond repute
I never had an issue with the qualification system. It is a set of rules. You play by them. Sometimes you go, sometimes you don't.

Any changes to the qualification system must ensure that all teams, no matter the quality of there performance at regionals, have some chance to attend the Championship. The Championship is where most rookie teams (that did not spin off of an existing team) get their inspiration to go on and try to compete the next year.

If you go to a performance based system, then Super regionals will be required, as mentioned in an earlier post.

There has to be a buffer of some kind between the "everyone is welcome" atmosphere at regionals and the "only winners are welcome" atmosphere of a performanced based Championship.

Yes, you will get better competition. But is that what you are pursuing?

If the Championship is only about winning, you might as well get rid of the Chairman's Award. It will become meaningless in no time.

Finally, good luck Dave and your committee. I hope you get some useful ideas from this and all of the other posts.
__________________
Warren B

Pool Noodles. They're not just for bumpers anymore.
Reply With Quote
  #53   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-09-2003, 13:27
Chris Hibner's Avatar Unsung FIRST Hero
Chris Hibner Chris Hibner is offline
Eschewing Obfuscation Since 1990
AKA: Lars Kamen's Roadie
FRC #0051 (Wings of Fire (on sabbatical))
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2001
Rookie Year: 1997
Location: Canton, MI
Posts: 1,489
Chris Hibner has a reputation beyond reputeChris Hibner has a reputation beyond reputeChris Hibner has a reputation beyond reputeChris Hibner has a reputation beyond reputeChris Hibner has a reputation beyond reputeChris Hibner has a reputation beyond reputeChris Hibner has a reputation beyond reputeChris Hibner has a reputation beyond reputeChris Hibner has a reputation beyond reputeChris Hibner has a reputation beyond reputeChris Hibner has a reputation beyond repute
whoa

Wow, this is a LONG thread, so I haven't had time to read all of the posts. I hope I'm not posting anything that has been mentioned already.

I agree that it might be difficult to change things this late for this year, so perhaps waiting for next year would be good, but then again, we had even teams 2 years ago, odd last year, so it wouldn't be fair to have even teams go this year and then change it before the odd teams get to go next year.


%%% CRAZY PROPOSAL %%%%%%%%

I think that the majority of the spots should be based upon the current year, with just a little bit guaranteed from history. However that might make it difficult for travel arrangements.

Here is what I would propose (I know it's quite a bit away from the status quo, but I think drastic measures will be needed before too long, so why not start now?):

1) Hold the kick-off the 2nd Saturday in September. This gives teams 2 weeks to organize a team (most schools start the last week of August now).
2) Robots must ship near the last Tuesday of October (six weeks plus 3 days - same schedule as now).
3) Hold regionals all through November and first two or three weeks of December (skip Thanksgiving weekend). If necessary, hold regionals the first couple weeks of January.
4) Schedule the Championship during its current week. That way, there is at least 3 months (maybe 4) for teams to book travel once the regionals are over.
5) Teams that get to go to the Championship are chosen as follows:
a) X number (say 300 teams) - history teams = Y teams
b) rank the teams based upon a point system for the CURRENT year.
c) the top Y teams in the points get to go to the championship.

%%%% END CRAZY PROPOSAL %%%%%%%%%%

Dave, I know that is a little more detail than you want, so here are the meta- criteria:

- Base the criteria for the Championship mostly (say 80 - 90%) on the current year.
- Line up the schedule to be more throughout the school year - a year-long thing with a break in the middle.
- Give teams a LOT of time to book travel arrangements instead of making them scramble if they qualify at the last minute.
Reply With Quote
  #54   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-09-2003, 15:13
P.J. Baker's Avatar
P.J. Baker P.J. Baker is offline
needs a clever user title
FRC #0177 (Bobcat Robotics)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2001
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Hebron, CT
Posts: 110
P.J. Baker is a glorious beacon of lightP.J. Baker is a glorious beacon of lightP.J. Baker is a glorious beacon of lightP.J. Baker is a glorious beacon of lightP.J. Baker is a glorious beacon of light
4 years

The only useful suggestion that I can think to make is to have a random component and a performance component.

I would suggest that both be based on a rolling 4 year cycle (high school is 4 years long, right?)

A team's chance at getting a random invite should increase each year that they do not attend the championships. Hopefully the numbers would work out that teams would not be held out of the championships for an entire high school cycle.

For the performance aspect, I would suggest that teams keep their last four years worth of qual points. Teams that are consistently good, but not champions or whatever would eventually get rewarded with a shot at the championships.
Reply With Quote
  #55   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-09-2003, 16:26
Joe Johnson's Avatar Unsung FIRST Hero
Joe Johnson Joe Johnson is offline
Engineer at Medrobotics
AKA: Dr. Joe
FRC #0088 (TJ2)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Raynham, MA
Posts: 2,648
Joe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond repute
WHOA! That is a heated thread...

Hi all,

I hated the even/odd thing from the beginning because it was DOOMED FROM THE START due to 30% annual growth.

I agree with PJ that a balance of random and performance based criteria is needed.

I also agree that a lottery that essentially gives you more and more chances of making it the more years you miss the lottery is a good way of making it work.

I would also add that a team that signs up for the Nationals, then backs out should go to the back of the line in terms of lottery odds.

Until TV is paying for teams to go to the Nationals (ala the NCAA tourney), I cannot see FIRST going to a system where all teams qualify based on this year's competition. It is a good goal to think of, but not realistic until some revenue source outside of the team's pockets is paying the bills.

That is all I have for now...

Joe J.
Reply With Quote
  #56   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-09-2003, 17:19
Unsung FIRST Hero
Rich Wong Rich Wong is offline
NYC FIRST Planning Committee Member
no team (NYC FIRST)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 1,674
Rich Wong has a reputation beyond reputeRich Wong has a reputation beyond reputeRich Wong has a reputation beyond reputeRich Wong has a reputation beyond reputeRich Wong has a reputation beyond reputeRich Wong has a reputation beyond reputeRich Wong has a reputation beyond reputeRich Wong has a reputation beyond reputeRich Wong has a reputation beyond reputeRich Wong has a reputation beyond reputeRich Wong has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Rich Wong
Re: Chamionship Qualification - feedback needed ASAP!

Quote:
Originally posted by dlavery
FIRST is considering modifications to the criteria and procedures used to qualify for the FIRST Championship for 2004. -dave lavery
FIRST Executive Advisory Board
First I would like to thank Dave L for asking the community. This reflects the respect and trust they have for FIRSTers. I have read some excellent ideas so let me add to these recommendations (some of the ideas have been said already):

1. Most important group- invite all to the National event all regional chairman’s Award and Inspiration Award winners.
They represent the heart of FIRST.
2. Invite all Rookie teams to the Championship. They should be given an opportunity to attend the National.
If they decide not to attend for any reason, their invitation to the National can be held & used for future Nationals.
3. Invite all teams that have NEVER attended a National Championship.
To attend the National is one of the best award and satisfaction any FIRST team can have.
4. Invite all non-field-of-play award winners are to the National. Best design, idea, function, spirit etc.
5. Any additional slots in the National can be given out using a lottery system. This can be done early in the season.

The list is by most importance to less importance.
__________________
popularis de ob instinctus agnitionis scientia technologia
Home website: www.nycnjfirst.org
Member of NEMO & e^(i*pi)+1 Fraternity.
Member of Friends of Robots
Member of NYCFIRST Planning Committee
Reply With Quote
  #57   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-09-2003, 11:07
Ken Loyd Ken Loyd is offline
Who is John Galt?
FRC #0039 (The 39th Aerosquadron)
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Rookie Year: 1998
Location: Gilbert, Arizona
Posts: 414
Ken Loyd is a splendid one to beholdKen Loyd is a splendid one to beholdKen Loyd is a splendid one to beholdKen Loyd is a splendid one to beholdKen Loyd is a splendid one to beholdKen Loyd is a splendid one to beholdKen Loyd is a splendid one to beholdKen Loyd is a splendid one to behold
I am in favor of increasing the "aura" of the regionals. I would like to see the prestige factor of the regionals raised. Let going to the regionals become as important as going to the finals, not merely a stepping stone to the finals.

As for a championship, let the top four teams of each regional east of the Mississippi go to the East Finals. Let the top four teams of each regional west of the Mississippi go to the West finals. Empty slots at each final could be filled using some selection process.

Let the top two teams from each final compete to determine the national champion on National TV with the proceeds used to fund the finals.

The "old guy" from Mesa Arizona,
Ken Loyd
Teacher/Advisor
Team #64
The Gila Monsters
Reply With Quote
  #58   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-09-2003, 12:41
Unsung FIRST Hero
Matt Leese Matt Leese is offline
Been-In-FIRST-Too-Long
FRC #1438 (The Aztechs)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2001
Rookie Year: 1998
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 937
Matt Leese has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Leese has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Leese has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Leese has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Leese has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Leese has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Leese has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Leese has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Leese has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Leese has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Leese has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Matt Leese
Most of any commentary I'd have has already been covered. The main issue I've always had about qualifying for nationals has been the fact that it is nearly impossible for a team to qualify for nationals the next year unless you attend two regionals. This is because the point system requires you to have five points which means you have to win the regional and a technical award if you only attend one event. This can be a very challenging thing to do. Given that it's not really an option for many teams to attend two regionals (particularly if they are attending nationals this year), I think that the qualification process should be made to allow more teams to attend based on previous years preformance while limiting the number of teams that attend on the even/odd side of things.

Matt
Reply With Quote
  #59   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-09-2003, 12:51
ahecht's Avatar
ahecht ahecht is offline
'Luzer'
AKA: Zan
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Billerica, MA
Posts: 978
ahecht has a reputation beyond reputeahecht has a reputation beyond reputeahecht has a reputation beyond reputeahecht has a reputation beyond reputeahecht has a reputation beyond reputeahecht has a reputation beyond reputeahecht has a reputation beyond reputeahecht has a reputation beyond reputeahecht has a reputation beyond reputeahecht has a reputation beyond reputeahecht has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via ICQ to ahecht Send a message via AIM to ahecht Send a message via Yahoo to ahecht
One suggestion from this thread, which I really liked, is to first limit Championship attendance to teams that have submitted a Chairman's Award entry.

So much of the spirit of FIRST is based upon the ideals embodied by the Chairman's Award that the basic effort of filling out a questionaire and writing a 4 page paper should be a prerequisite for attending the Championship.

Other selection methods of course would follow, but the first criteria should be a CA submission.
__________________
Zan Hecht

Scorekeeper: '05 Championship DaVinci Field/'10 WPI Regional
Co-Founder: WPI-EBOT Educational Robotics Program
Alumnus: WPI/Mass Academy Team #190
Alumnus (and founder): Oakwood Robotics Team #992


"Life is an odd numbered problem the answer isn't in the back of the book." — Anonymous WPI Student
Reply With Quote
  #60   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-09-2003, 13:15
Andrew Andrew is offline
Registered User
#0356
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 393
Andrew is a name known to allAndrew is a name known to allAndrew is a name known to allAndrew is a name known to allAndrew is a name known to allAndrew is a name known to all
Other meta-criteria:

A selection process which is scalable to the number of teams.

If you have 100 teams or 1500 teams, the selection process would not need to change.

A selection process which allows us to focus our efforts on inspiring and mentoring students, building good robots and teams, rather than on winning regional competitions.

If a team is spending all of its energies at a regional to qualify for nationals, then it cannot, of necessity, spare resources to help other teams and make their experience more inspiring.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 13:28.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi