Go to Post It looks like you put a robot through a paper shredder. - Madwolvez [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Electrical
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-11-2003, 16:35
CNCBoy461's Avatar
CNCBoy461 CNCBoy461 is offline
Spaz
AKA: Matt
#0461 (WBI (Westside Boiler Invasion))
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: West Lafayette IN
Posts: 12
CNCBoy461 is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via AIM to CNCBoy461
Question 2004 Robot Controller

Ok, the 2004 EDU-Robot controllers are out…but are these going to be the FIRST Robot controllers as well? I fell pretty stupid asking this question, but I have not been able to find a straight up answer for the new 2004 FIRST Robot controller. Please, no rumors here, I am trying to get electrical connectors for the “new” controller AKA EDU-Robot. Thanks a lot! -Matt
__________________
WBI Team 461
Let's All Go Nuts!
ROBOTS! ROBOTS!
CNC Master...6061, the prefered metal of choice
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-11-2003, 16:56
Rickertsen2 Rickertsen2 is offline
Umm Errr...
None #1139 (Chamblee Gear Grinders)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: ATL
Posts: 1,421
Rickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant futureRickertsen2 has a brilliant future
Send a message via AIM to Rickertsen2 Send a message via Yahoo to Rickertsen2
These will not e the controllers we will use for the actual competition. There is a comparison of the EduBot controller and the full controller here: http://www.innovationfirst.com/FIRSTRobotics/edu-rc.htm
__________________
1139 Alumni
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-11-2003, 10:33
CNCBoy461's Avatar
CNCBoy461 CNCBoy461 is offline
Spaz
AKA: Matt
#0461 (WBI (Westside Boiler Invasion))
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: West Lafayette IN
Posts: 12
CNCBoy461 is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via AIM to CNCBoy461
Follow Up

Thanks for the link! I didn’t even see that specs sheet Anyway, the new controller will be the same size, just the internals will be different. Excellent! 7 weeks until kickoff, can't wait and good luck too all the teams
__________________
WBI Team 461
Let's All Go Nuts!
ROBOTS! ROBOTS!
CNC Master...6061, the prefered metal of choice
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-11-2003, 10:49
Dave Flowerday Dave Flowerday is offline
Software Engineer
VRC #0111 (Wildstang)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Rookie Year: 1995
Location: North Barrington, IL
Posts: 1,366
Dave Flowerday has a reputation beyond reputeDave Flowerday has a reputation beyond reputeDave Flowerday has a reputation beyond reputeDave Flowerday has a reputation beyond reputeDave Flowerday has a reputation beyond reputeDave Flowerday has a reputation beyond reputeDave Flowerday has a reputation beyond reputeDave Flowerday has a reputation beyond reputeDave Flowerday has a reputation beyond reputeDave Flowerday has a reputation beyond reputeDave Flowerday has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Follow Up

Quote:
Originally posted by CNCBoy461
Anyway, the new controller will be the same size, just the internals will be different.
Where did you get that information?
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-11-2003, 11:41
Jeremy_Mc's Avatar
Jeremy_Mc Jeremy_Mc is offline
GitHubber
no team
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 496
Jeremy_Mc will become famous soon enoughJeremy_Mc will become famous soon enough
Re: Follow Up

Quote:
Originally posted by CNCBoy461
Anyway, the new controller will be the same size, just the internals will be different. Excellent!
Not quite....

Size (W x L x H)
Full Size: 6" x 7" x 0.9"
EDU-RC: 3.4" x 4.6" x 0.75"

Externals such as inputs are different, too.

If you're not 100% sure of something, please look at the link supplied by Rickertsen ( http://www.innovationfirst.com/FIRSTRobotics/edu-rc.htm ) before you comment on this.
__________________
GitHub - Collaborate on code, documentation, etc. - http://github.com
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-11-2003, 20:42
Sachiel7's Avatar
Sachiel7 Sachiel7 is offline
<Yes I managed to flip it
AKA: Shayne Helms
FRC #1132 (RAPTAR Robotics)
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 541
Sachiel7 is just really niceSachiel7 is just really niceSachiel7 is just really niceSachiel7 is just really niceSachiel7 is just really nice
Send a message via AIM to Sachiel7
I think he meant that the 2004 RC will be the same size as previous year's RCs.
__________________
-=Sachiel7=-

There's no such thing as being too simple!
Look for Team #1132, RAPTAR Robotics at the VCU Regional this year!
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-11-2003, 10:37
CNCBoy461's Avatar
CNCBoy461 CNCBoy461 is offline
Spaz
AKA: Matt
#0461 (WBI (Westside Boiler Invasion))
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: West Lafayette IN
Posts: 12
CNCBoy461 is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via AIM to CNCBoy461
Yeah, thats right, the 2004 RC has the same dimensions as the 2003 model, the 2004 EDU-robot is smaller than the 2003 as well.
__________________
WBI Team 461
Let's All Go Nuts!
ROBOTS! ROBOTS!
CNC Master...6061, the prefered metal of choice
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-11-2003, 09:21
Balbinot
 
Posts: n/a
I heard that there´s like a thousand pages of documentation for this year RC.

Really freaks me out.
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-11-2003, 09:43
GregTheGreat's Avatar
GregTheGreat GregTheGreat is offline
Registered User
no team
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 386
GregTheGreat has a spectacular aura aboutGregTheGreat has a spectacular aura aboutGregTheGreat has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally posted by Balbinot
I heard that there´s like a thousand pages of documentation for this year RC.

Really freaks me out.
It would make sense since they basically changed the whole controller. They changed the language, the PWM's (they have 4 fast PWM's now) and many other things.

The one thing I don't like is that they are keeping the same OI, so whatever your transmit rate is (the 28 ms...I think) is the same rate you will transmit this year. That basically eliminates the whole use of the fast PWM's (except for auton mode)

-Greg the Great
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-11-2003, 11:35
Mike Soukup's Avatar
Mike Soukup Mike Soukup is offline
Software guy
FRC #0111 (Wildstang)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Schaumburg, IL
Posts: 797
Mike Soukup has a reputation beyond reputeMike Soukup has a reputation beyond reputeMike Soukup has a reputation beyond reputeMike Soukup has a reputation beyond reputeMike Soukup has a reputation beyond reputeMike Soukup has a reputation beyond reputeMike Soukup has a reputation beyond reputeMike Soukup has a reputation beyond reputeMike Soukup has a reputation beyond reputeMike Soukup has a reputation beyond reputeMike Soukup has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally posted by GregTheGreat
The one thing I don't like is that they are keeping the same OI, so whatever your transmit rate is (the 28 ms...I think) is the same rate you will transmit this year. That basically eliminates the whole use of the fast PWM's (except for auton mode)
Not true. The fast PWM's are quite valuable for feedback loops even in user control mode. A lot of the latency in feedback mechanisms such as crab wheel positioning & arm angle is in how often the motor speed is updated.

Think about it this way. The driver of a crab style robot doesn't change the desired direction of the wheels every 28 ms, and as far as the driver is concerned the delay between moving the stick & the robot getting the signal 28 ms later is negligible. The big problem is when the driver moves the stick and the wheels overshoot their target or when start oscillating back & forth. This is where the fast PWMs come in. Analog & digital inputs on the robot are updated every program loop, so we can take the driver's desired target (which is constant for 28ms) and the fast updating crab position and use those to control our feedback loop. Now we get to update our desired motor speed every time through the program cycle and the fast PWMs allow us to send that value to the speed controllers. Does that make sense?

Mike
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-11-2003, 13:13
Sachiel7's Avatar
Sachiel7 Sachiel7 is offline
<Yes I managed to flip it
AKA: Shayne Helms
FRC #1132 (RAPTAR Robotics)
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 541
Sachiel7 is just really niceSachiel7 is just really niceSachiel7 is just really niceSachiel7 is just really niceSachiel7 is just really nice
Send a message via AIM to Sachiel7
Where have they said the same OIs are being used?
I haven't seen anything directly stating that. They Do still have links up to the "current" OIs manuals, but that doesn't mean much. They may upgrade it so it does have a higher transfer rate, and It may not use 900MHz radios anymore (Although I'm not sure why they'd switch) I doubt that they're going to use the STAMPs that are in the OI now to continue with next year's PIC based system. They'll probably bump the stamps to a PIC as well. Just my guess.
But when they say new control "system", that to me is different from new "RC". It also wouldn't make too much sense that the User_Routines.C Processes every 17ms if they're going to keep the transfer rate at 28ms. The main user_routines is designed for user drive mode, and it would mean every 2 cycles you would process the new data, thus your actual transfer time is more in the range of 34ms (for output), and would be a slowdown from this past year's system. It doesn't make sense.
__________________
-=Sachiel7=-

There's no such thing as being too simple!
Look for Team #1132, RAPTAR Robotics at the VCU Regional this year!
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-11-2003, 13:47
Dave Flowerday Dave Flowerday is offline
Software Engineer
VRC #0111 (Wildstang)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Rookie Year: 1995
Location: North Barrington, IL
Posts: 1,366
Dave Flowerday has a reputation beyond reputeDave Flowerday has a reputation beyond reputeDave Flowerday has a reputation beyond reputeDave Flowerday has a reputation beyond reputeDave Flowerday has a reputation beyond reputeDave Flowerday has a reputation beyond reputeDave Flowerday has a reputation beyond reputeDave Flowerday has a reputation beyond reputeDave Flowerday has a reputation beyond reputeDave Flowerday has a reputation beyond reputeDave Flowerday has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally posted by Sachiel7
They may upgrade it so it does have a higher transfer rate, and It may not use 900MHz radios anymore (Although I'm not sure why they'd switch)
Pure speculation: I doubt they'll change the radios to be higher than 9600bps. My reasoning is that 9600 is "fast enough". The data from the OI gets to the robot in a short enough amount of time that it's not a noticeable delay to the operator. Sure, we'd all love to be able to pump back more data to the OI, but I doubt that's a big concern for IFI. Radios that run more than 9600bps are expensive. If anything, I'd guess that they'd change to radios that allowed more channels. They were getting really close to using all 40 channels at Houston last year, and that increases the risk that two different robot's signals will interfere with each other.
Quote:
I doubt that they're going to use the STAMPs that are in the OI now to continue with next year's PIC based system.
I'm not sure how this rumor got started (and I've seen it mentioned before in other threads), but the OI doesn't have a BASIC Stamp in it, and to my knowledge it never has. Think about it - why would they put a stamp in the OI? Stamps are considerably more expensive than other embedded processors, are a whole lot slower, and use a rather clumsy programming language.
Quote:
It also wouldn't make too much sense that the User_Routines.C Processes every 17ms if they're going to keep the transfer rate at 28ms.
Page 10 of the 2004 Programming Reference Guide actually says that Process_Data_From_Master_uP() runs at 17ms on the EDUbot only. It specifically states that it still runs at 26ms on the real RC.
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-11-2003, 17:27
Sachiel7's Avatar
Sachiel7 Sachiel7 is offline
<Yes I managed to flip it
AKA: Shayne Helms
FRC #1132 (RAPTAR Robotics)
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 541
Sachiel7 is just really niceSachiel7 is just really niceSachiel7 is just really niceSachiel7 is just really niceSachiel7 is just really nice
Send a message via AIM to Sachiel7
Quote:
I'm not sure how this rumor got started (and I've seen it mentioned before in other threads), but the OI doesn't have a BASIC Stamp in it, and to my knowledge it never has. Think about it - why would they put a stamp in the OI? Stamps are considerably more expensive than other embedded processors, are a whole lot slower, and use a rather clumsy programming language.

The OI does indeed contain at least one basic stamp. The RC contains 3. If I remember correctly the OI contains more than one. There are (or were) a total of 9 stamps throughout the entire control system up until now. This information used to be posted on IFI's site under the 2003 RC page, but has been removed for 2004. I'm trying to find my old documentation where it shows a map of all the stamps.
I was just saying that the radio was an idea, I hadn't actually heard any talk of it. But the fact that the new eduRC doesn't run on 900MHz radio gave some speculation to people that they might be switching to something new. I personally think they'll stick with the current radios, and as you said, may increase the channels. Especially with the new number of teams this year.

Quote:
Page 10 of the 2004 Programming Reference Guide actually says that Process_Data_From_Master_uP() runs at 17ms on the EDUbot only. It specifically states that it still runs at 26ms on the real RC.

Thank you for clearing that up for me. I think that if any changes are made, that they'll speed up the feedback. The dashboard program is now uncontinued, so it makes one wonder if they're coming up with a new method of feedback, or if they're updating the dashboard software for the new system. Either way, I'd like to see more be done with feedback. I know last year we were working on a system of ultrasonic sensors, and we worked on a 3D program to run on the laptop we had. The program would take the ultrasonic feedback (among other sensors) and show the robots position on the field, as well as putting up transparent "walls" where it received feedback. It didn't get too far though, since the hardware didn't like if much. I think if IFI made things like that a little easier, It would be a good improvement.
I do like the OI as is...It just seems like some minor adjustments could be made.
__________________
-=Sachiel7=-

There's no such thing as being too simple!
Look for Team #1132, RAPTAR Robotics at the VCU Regional this year!
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-11-2003, 01:01
Sachiel7's Avatar
Sachiel7 Sachiel7 is offline
<Yes I managed to flip it
AKA: Shayne Helms
FRC #1132 (RAPTAR Robotics)
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 541
Sachiel7 is just really niceSachiel7 is just really niceSachiel7 is just really niceSachiel7 is just really niceSachiel7 is just really nice
Send a message via AIM to Sachiel7
Here you go:

http://innovationfirst.com/FIRSTRobotics/system.htm

Quote:
Looking to burn rubber in competition? Take a peek under the “hood” of any FIRST robot, and you’ll find an Innovation First Control System. Whoa- are you seeing this? Ten microcontrollers. Scores of analog and digital inputs. Twenty-four motor outputs. And a user programmable processor for enhanced robot control. This bad boy even feeds critical information from the robot back to the pilots. In other words, you can put the pedal to the metal any way you like it. Sweet. This state-of-the-art control system was originally designed for the FIRST competition, but it’s red-lining with educational opportunity. Imagine what it can do for you.
(PS, Now I know what's fueled IFI to update their site... )

That's one location where they mention it. I think in one of the old guides they have a map of all the Stamps in the system. There's 3 on the RC for processing the program, at least one on the OI. There's at least one in each modem...I think...
I've got to find that diagram, I know I've seen it before. I'll just post back when I find it...

::scavenges through notebooks, web pages and junk::

BTW-I think that the MCs in the radios are PIC's, Right? Maybe the OI already runs on them, and that's one reason why IFI chose them. Just a thought...
__________________
-=Sachiel7=-

There's no such thing as being too simple!
Look for Team #1132, RAPTAR Robotics at the VCU Regional this year!
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-11-2003, 10:50
Dave Flowerday Dave Flowerday is offline
Software Engineer
VRC #0111 (Wildstang)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Rookie Year: 1995
Location: North Barrington, IL
Posts: 1,366
Dave Flowerday has a reputation beyond reputeDave Flowerday has a reputation beyond reputeDave Flowerday has a reputation beyond reputeDave Flowerday has a reputation beyond reputeDave Flowerday has a reputation beyond reputeDave Flowerday has a reputation beyond reputeDave Flowerday has a reputation beyond reputeDave Flowerday has a reputation beyond reputeDave Flowerday has a reputation beyond reputeDave Flowerday has a reputation beyond reputeDave Flowerday has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally posted by Sachiel7
The OI does indeed contain at least one basic stamp. The RC contains 3. If I remember correctly the OI contains more than one.
Here, take a look at this. It shows the inside of the OI and RC, and you can clearly see in the pictures that there is only 1 Stamp between the two of them (in the RC). The rest of the work is done by PICs.
Quote:
I think in one of the old guides they have a map of all the Stamps in the system. There's 3 on the RC for processing the program, at least one on the OI. There's at least one in each modem...I think...
I've got to find that diagram, I know I've seen it before. I'll just post back when I find it...
I think this is what's throwing you off course. They do talk about having multiple microcontrollers in the system, however they never indicate that they're all Stamps. In fact, as I mentioned before, the only Stamp is the user-controlled one. Everything else is done with Microchip PICs (hence the reason they upgraded the user CPU to a PIC - they're already familiar with it).
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How much planning goes into your robot? Jnadke General Forum 41 29-01-2006 21:29
serious problem found - robot controller resets when jarred! KenWittlief Electrical 23 19-03-2003 13:30
Controlling a FIRST robot with a Lego RCX Controller? archiver 2001 5 24-06-2002 04:19
WASH Palm scouting at the Championship Mike Soukup Scouting 2 19-04-2002 15:14
about how Drive Train push the robot... shouldn't the force accelerate the robot? Ken Leung Technical Discussion 12 26-11-2001 09:39


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 23:42.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi