Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kevin Watson
|
I agree Kevin. That's what I've used before.
I also agree with employing a "Pretty Print" style clean-up program as Dave suggested to make it easier to be sure new code adheres to the CD standard.
And Gene's rating system is interesting.
I think the coding standard itself will be fairly easy to define.
For general consumption I think we'll need to be able to condense the major points to one or two sheets of bullets that is then backed by the in-depth standard definition and reasoning.
[edit] We'll need to think hardest about platform (PIC) specific and IFI specific standards.