|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
i dont find much wrong with the way FIRST pairs. I think that if you were paired with the same team three times, it was their fault but i havent witnessed too much of that.
i don't aggree with FIRST allowing ranked teams to pick other ranked teams. The reason for rankings is to seperate the best and that whole philosophy means nothing if they can pick each other |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A New Concept for the Tournament Structure in 2004 | Andrew | Rules/Strategy | 38 | 07-07-2003 12:30 |
| Random Pairings??? | DragnButt | General Forum | 11 | 23-03-2003 11:34 |
| Ohio Final Round Pairings | Tyler 178 | Regional Competitions | 19 | 13-03-2003 22:00 |
| QUESTION - Random Alliance Pairings | archiver | 2001 | 2 | 24-06-2002 02:03 |
| Division Prediction Pool | The Lucas | Championship Event | 16 | 19-04-2002 04:06 |