Go to Post -dave "The Circular Saw of FIRST" lavery - dlavery [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
View Poll Results: How much planning goes into your robot?
Drafting - None or very little pre-assembly planning - Hey, We're Optimistic. 27 12.39%
Drafting - Moderate - Only essential systems are drawn up. 94 43.12%
Drafting - Extreme - You could drive the robot before it's been built! 73 33.49%
Calculations - None or very little - We live on the edge. 18 8.26%
Calculations - Moderate - Yeah, we did a few to get some things right. 107 49.08%
Calculations - Extreme - Is that an African or European Swallow? 59 27.06%
Robot!?!? You mean we're supposed to be building a robot!? 30 13.76%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 218. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 4 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  #31   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-01-2005, 20:51
BNield BNield is offline
Registered User
#1318
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Washington
Posts: 2
BNield is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: How much planning goes into your robot?

I would say we've done a great deal of drawings for arm design concepts. Some have tentative measurements some have none and some are competely to scale.
As for calculations they exist to make us change our arm design.

Our design process has gone something like this:

Draw a concept design of the arm
Redraw it with angle and length measurements
calculate torque etc.
redesign arm
repeat
Reply With Quote
  #32   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-01-2005, 21:03
KORN_lover_2007's Avatar
KORN_lover_2007 KORN_lover_2007 is offline
You may not know me, but I love you
AKA: Lindsay
FRC #1108 (Panther Robotics)
Team Role: Student
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Paola, Kansas
Posts: 56
KORN_lover_2007 is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via AIM to KORN_lover_2007 Send a message via MSN to KORN_lover_2007 Send a message via Yahoo to KORN_lover_2007
Re: How much planning goes into your robot?

A lot of our planning includes breaking into smaller teams and each creating a different prototype, then all getting together and putting all our ideas together to make one great robot. But we really try hard to do lots of calculations to get it all as accurate as possible.
__________________
I heart you all and the championship was so killertubulistic! 2nd place alliance Galileo field! Mr.Bill rox! Thank you alliance teams 447 and 492! Also thank you team 365 for your spirit award! Oh yeah, I almost got ran over by Dean Kamen on his segway, how cool is that?! I now claim all FIRSTers as my family.

www.pantherrobotics.com
Reply With Quote
  #33   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-01-2006, 15:45
keithv708's Avatar
keithv708 keithv708 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Keith
FRC #1208 (The Metool Brigade)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: O'fallon IL
Posts: 10
keithv708 can only hope to improve
Send a message via AIM to keithv708 Send a message via MSN to keithv708 Send a message via Yahoo to keithv708
Re: How much planning goes into your robot?

a lot
Reply With Quote
  #34   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-01-2006, 15:58
paulcd2000's Avatar
paulcd2000 paulcd2000 is offline
Accidentally speaks in C
AKA: Paul Dagnelie
FRC #1719 (The Umbrella Corp.)
Team Role: Programmer
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 368
paulcd2000 is a jewel in the roughpaulcd2000 is a jewel in the roughpaulcd2000 is a jewel in the rough
Send a message via AIM to paulcd2000
Re: How much planning goes into your robot?

We were supposed to plan a robot???! aw man, we were building a time machne!!!!!! ;-)
__________________
"People don't say 'It's just a game' when their team is winning!" -- Scott Adams

5.5 students (on average)* $7/h *210 hours/student= $8085 of labor, all volunteered (not counting mentors', who are each that much)

We have blades on our robot?! ***sweeeeeet***

There are 11 types of people in the world. Those who can read binary, those who can't, and those who say this joke is supposed to be, "There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who can read binary and those who have a life."
Reply With Quote
  #35   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-01-2006, 16:30
Winged Wonder's Avatar
Winged Wonder Winged Wonder is offline
Engineer disguised as a Physicist
AKA: Leslie Salas
FRC #0233 (The Pink Team)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 338
Winged Wonder has a reputation beyond reputeWinged Wonder has a reputation beyond reputeWinged Wonder has a reputation beyond reputeWinged Wonder has a reputation beyond reputeWinged Wonder has a reputation beyond reputeWinged Wonder has a reputation beyond reputeWinged Wonder has a reputation beyond reputeWinged Wonder has a reputation beyond reputeWinged Wonder has a reputation beyond reputeWinged Wonder has a reputation beyond reputeWinged Wonder has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Winged Wonder Send a message via Yahoo to Winged Wonder
Re: How much planning goes into your robot?

We work with NASA programmers, engineers, and machinists out at the KSC Prototype Lab, so even though our students do a lot of the calculations and drafting, i'd consider them both to be at the Extreme level.

Roccobot is completely designed from top to bottom and everything inbetween in a program called Pro-Engineering, or Pro-E for short. (its kind of like CADD for those of you who know what that is... essentially, we build a complete three-dimensional model to an extremely accurate scale on this program before we even think of going to the machine shop) We know exactly how the robot looks and pretty much how it will work before we even think of taking a sheet of aluminum to the watercutter.

Just because we arent allowed to use the machinery out at NASA (due to liability issues) does not mean that our mentors build our robots for us. Although techinically they machine each unique part for us, we students are the ones who work on Pro-E and actually design the robot first. Then a mentor will look over what we've done, and together both the students and mentors will work to achieve perfection. If we machine something and it doesnt work, we go back to the drawing board and try again, but our goal is to never have to do something all over again. [Six weeks is not long enough, and we do not want to waste time by having to rework calculations just because something was off by five millimeters. We want to ensure that we conserve as much time as possible, so that our drivers can at least get a little practice time in before we ship the robot.] After each part is made, the members of our pit crew actually assemble to robot themselves, with very little if any aid from mentors, only using the Pro-E blueprints that we've printed out. This way, everyone on the pit crew knows exactly what goes where and how it all works, just in case something stops functioning after a match.

It's a lot of work, but its worth it.
__________________


I GIVE FREE HUGS AT COMPETITIONS!! (just ask!) | Real Men Wear Bodypaint Pink! | Good Luck This Year!!


Embrace your inner dorkiness, because face it, life is too short to be cool.
Reply With Quote
  #36   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-01-2006, 16:35
Rick TYler Rick TYler is offline
A VEX GUy WIth A STicky SHift KEy
VRC #0010 (Exothermic Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Redmond, Washington
Posts: 2,000
Rick TYler has a reputation beyond reputeRick TYler has a reputation beyond reputeRick TYler has a reputation beyond reputeRick TYler has a reputation beyond reputeRick TYler has a reputation beyond reputeRick TYler has a reputation beyond reputeRick TYler has a reputation beyond reputeRick TYler has a reputation beyond reputeRick TYler has a reputation beyond reputeRick TYler has a reputation beyond reputeRick TYler has a reputation beyond repute
Re: How much planning goes into your robot?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Winged Wonder
We work with NASA programmers, engineers, and machinists out at the KSC Prototype Lab
We're hoping to get electricity run to our build shop before next season starts...
__________________
Exothermic Robotics Club, Venturing Crew 2036
VRC 10A, 10B, 10D, 10Q, 10V, 10X, 10Z, and 575
Reply With Quote
  #37   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-01-2006, 16:45
BRosser314's Avatar
BRosser314 BRosser314 is offline
Post-A-Holic
AKA: Brandon Rosser
FRC #0469 (Las Guerrillas)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Flint, Michigan
Posts: 184
BRosser314 is a splendid one to beholdBRosser314 is a splendid one to beholdBRosser314 is a splendid one to beholdBRosser314 is a splendid one to beholdBRosser314 is a splendid one to beholdBRosser314 is a splendid one to beholdBRosser314 is a splendid one to behold
Send a message via AIM to BRosser314 Send a message via Yahoo to BRosser314
Angry Re: How much planning goes into your robot?

Going into the 4th week we are still planning things and trying to cooperate with our one sponsoir that dropped us and wont make parts, and one company that said they could make our parts is not going to be able to. So I think we are about at the standar time we are usually at. Not being able to start working on the robot till the staart of the fourth week.
Reply With Quote
  #38   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-01-2006, 18:39
LightWaves1636's Avatar
LightWaves1636 LightWaves1636 is offline
is all over it.
AKA: Sarah Le
no team
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 603
LightWaves1636 is a splendid one to beholdLightWaves1636 is a splendid one to beholdLightWaves1636 is a splendid one to beholdLightWaves1636 is a splendid one to beholdLightWaves1636 is a splendid one to beholdLightWaves1636 is a splendid one to beholdLightWaves1636 is a splendid one to behold
Send a message via AIM to LightWaves1636 Send a message via Yahoo to LightWaves1636
Re: How much planning goes into your robot?

not enough
Reply With Quote
  #39   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-01-2006, 19:22
Cyberguy34000's Avatar
Cyberguy34000 Cyberguy34000 is offline
Scout-Master
AKA: Chris
FRC #0662 (Rocky Mountain Robotics)
Team Role: Scout
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 410
Cyberguy34000 has a reputation beyond reputeCyberguy34000 has a reputation beyond reputeCyberguy34000 has a reputation beyond reputeCyberguy34000 has a reputation beyond reputeCyberguy34000 has a reputation beyond reputeCyberguy34000 has a reputation beyond reputeCyberguy34000 has a reputation beyond reputeCyberguy34000 has a reputation beyond reputeCyberguy34000 has a reputation beyond reputeCyberguy34000 has a reputation beyond reputeCyberguy34000 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Cyberguy34000
Re: How much planning goes into your robot?

We're 3 weeks in... and still designing! They say we'll finish CADing tonight...

probibly...

hopefully...

maybe?...

Ah screw it, it ain't happening!
__________________

I love deadlines, I love the wooshing sound they make as they fly by. - Douglas Adams

They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security. - Benjamin Franklin

Reply With Quote
  #40   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-01-2006, 00:45
Modulardragon's Avatar
Modulardragon Modulardragon is offline
Registered User
FRC #1236 (Phoenix Rising)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Danville
Posts: 10
Modulardragon is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: How much planning goes into your robot?

oh, we've drawn up several designs of different parts, debated pros and cons of everything. We have a couple of really good drawings that sprang from thin air at 2:00AM. But so far, all we've done is planning.
Reply With Quote
  #41   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-01-2006, 21:20
kmcclary's Avatar
kmcclary kmcclary is offline
Founder 830/1015;Mentor 66/470/1502
FRC #0470 (Alpha Omega Robotics)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Rookie Year: 1994
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 491
kmcclary has a reputation beyond reputekmcclary has a reputation beyond reputekmcclary has a reputation beyond reputekmcclary has a reputation beyond reputekmcclary has a reputation beyond reputekmcclary has a reputation beyond reputekmcclary has a reputation beyond reputekmcclary has a reputation beyond reputekmcclary has a reputation beyond reputekmcclary has a reputation beyond reputekmcclary has a reputation beyond repute
Re: How much planning goes into your robot?

Well... It all depends on which team I've worked with that we're talking about.

Some of my old teams have sponsors that have their own methods,
that range from a mix of student/sponsor design to students
stating WHAT they want the robot to do, and the sponsors then
fully design a machine for them to manufacture. I'll let them
speak for themselves.

Now as for "my teams" (the few I'm working with the most), I've
provided a "Formal Game Analysis" method to help the *students*
mathematically figure out what designs will work, and what probably
won't. It looks at a game and *suggests* a range of *possible*
tactics and bot designs. (BTW, what it suggested for THIS year
blew even ME away!). I could talk about that method, but that's
a whole separate thread, and not relevant at this point of the season.

Anyway, one way or another we're left with a set of PRIORITIZED GOALS
for the machine, AND the overall machine's concept.

Next, **THE BIG RULE: "Machine Goals will be accomplished in PRIORITY
ORDER". Resources ($$, people, matl's, weight allowance, etc.) shall
be shunted from lower goals to achieve higher, as needed."** No
sense building something that won't accomplish your #1 goal!

Ex: A few years ago, we had: #1 as "Grab Small Balls", and #4 as
"Handle Big Ball".Well, during design the Big Ball Arm got in the
way of the small ball collector, so it was dropped!

We next make the goals CONCRETE, and PRIORITIZE them.
Ex: We don't say "It'll score a lot". Instead, concrete actions,
speeds, and times within the round are all defined. For example:
"In Auto Mode, the machine shall take no longer than <xx> seconds
to <move to this position> <do THAT> (or whatever)."
That's pretty specific! Of course with a 10 sec auto mode
this THEN suggests that "In Auto Mode, the PAYLOAD must
require no longer than (10-xx) sec to <do ITS specific thing>", etc.
We then do this for ALL actions, at ALL points throughout the game.

This yields a VERY specific set of performance specs for the machine,
but does NOT say HOW they should be accomplished.


At this point, my teams diverge again...


Some of my old teams then use "Centralized Design". The entire thing
is worked out in ALL detail. CAD drawings are made, etc. The build
now progresses like a manufacturing plant. Yea, this works well for
some teams, and their sponsor's philosophy. The design is well controlled,
Production management tools can be employed, etc.

But if you have TOO much of that, I've found it hard to get anyone to show
up to BUILD it! If for any reason they haven't felt a part of the decision
process (which often happens if you decide AGAINST their "favorite design")
they may even *abandon* the project because now they are ONLY
"labor for someone else's machine". (Hmmm...)


My current team uses a DIFFERENT philosophy. We let the SUBGROUPS
make ALL the manufacturing decisions for THEIR part of the problem,
DURING the build. After all, they are the ones that have to make it
work, they already have a very specific set of design goals in hand
it MUST accomplish, and a manufacturing timetable to meet.

So let's say for example Drivetrain decides to choose a walker bot
over a tank. Our rule: If it can meet ALL of the design specs we
laid out (including time, weight and size allocated to it) AND it can
be made to work in time, GO FOR IT!

This isn't without its own challenges... We often have some verrrrry
nervous mentors! But we HAVE "local" mentors in each subgroup to
keep an eye on it. You also don't KNOW exactly what you'll end up
with when they start!

But the advantages are many:

1) We get to building sooner. Once the spec is in place, they GO.
2) It challenges the students. All of the problems have NOT been worked
out when they begin. They have to THINK, and there are many
opportunities to teach them about how to solve something.
3) It encourages "creative problem solving" on the fly. Some VERY cool
stuff has come out of groups to cure certain problems encountered.
4) The design isn't "fixed in stone". If one thing won't work, the local
subgroup has the AUTHORITY to change things, whenever needed.
For example: If Drivetrain's "super delux 27 wheel drive" they're
attempting is overweight, won't work, or parts aren't available for it,
AND a basic two wheel two castor drive WILL, Drivetrain group is
FREE to change it in the MIDDLE of the build, as long as it won't
affect the STRATEGY of the bot.
5) We're free to EXPERIMENT. A subgroup that's ahead of schedule
may decide to try another thing, to see if that will work BETTER.
(...and if it DOES work better, use THAT instead!)

But really, HALF the fun of this method is we DON'T know what the bot
it'll LOOK like, until we're done. Yes, we know what it will DO, and
when it'll be READY, but the final form is VERY mutable during the build.
Also, we all often drop and run over to look when someone comes up with
something REALLY cool, which means you don't want to miss ANY build sessions!

But the best part is that when you're done, EVERYONE feels ownership.
You each know that YOUR decisions made during the build contributed
to <this> or <that> ability of the final robot.

Now don't get me wrong... I'm not knocking Super-CAD/CAE driven teams
at all! Testing a design on a CAE system REALLY helps! And if you
have way too large of a student/mentor ratio, having a huge work
plan predefined helps. People can just come back when they need
more work, and grab "Task #27" off the queue. VERY efficient.

But if you don't have a lot of CAD/CAE expertise on hand, giving
everyone the freedom to make LOCAL decisions DURING manufacturing
DOES work, and may even get you off the starting block a bit sooner.

Now IMO, the KEYS for ANY build method are having:
- WELL DEFINED GOALS for the robot to accomplish;
- A good work schedule defined up front that they MUST meet;
- Make sure everyone has the RESOURCES to accomplish (training,
matl, money, mentors, etc.);
- Someone in EACH group responsible for keeping an eye on the
schedule (no getting caught in trivia, we have a schedule to meet!);
- Having the GUTS to drop one line of research for another, if needed;
- GOOD COMMUNICATIONS, so everyone knows the status - between
all subgroups, students/mentors, teams and sponsor's locations,
team and school, etc.

Does that answer your question?

I hope this helps!

- Keith
__________________
Keith McClary - Organizer/Mentor/Sponsor - Ann Arbor MI area FIRST teams
ACTI - Automation Computer Technologies, Inc. (Sponsoring FIRST teams since 2001!)
MI Robot Club (Trainer) / GO-Tech Maker's Club / RepRap-Michigan) / SEMI CNC Club
"Certifiably Insane": Started FIVE FRC teams & many robot clubs (so far)!
2002: 830 "Rat Pack" | 2003-5;14: 1015;1076 "Pi Hi Samurai" | 2005-6: 1549 "Washtenuts"/"Fire Traxx"
2005-(on): 1502 "Technical Difficulties" | 2006-(on): FIRST Volunteer!
2009-(on): 470 "Alpha Omega" | WAFL | Sponsor & "Floating Engineer" for MI Dist 13 (Washtenaw Cnty)
2011: 3638 "Tigertrons" | 2013-(on): 4395 "ViBots" | 2014-(on) 66 "Grizzlies"
"Home" Teams: 66, 470, 1076, 1502, 4395
Local FIRST alumni at or coming to Ann Arbor (UM/EMU/WCC/Cleary)?
...We Want YOU as a Mentor! Please email me for info!
Support CDF Reputation - If a posting helped, thank 'em with rep points!
"It must be FRC build season when your spouse and children become 'Action Items 8 & 9'..."
Reply With Quote
  #42   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-01-2006, 21:29
Koko Ed's Avatar
Koko Ed Koko Ed is offline
Serial Volunteer
AKA: Ed Patterson
FRC #0191 (X-Cats)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Rochester,NY
Posts: 22,954
Koko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond repute
Re: How much planning goes into your robot?

We are a very detailed oreinted team. Partially because we wnat to make sure every aspect of the robot is built right and also to make sure that our kids are involved in the process so they actually learn from the experience instead of just showing up one day and BAM!- there a completed robot sitting in the shop one day after brainstorming.
We communicate with the CAD team and the sub team contribute their design ideas to the CAD team and the robot is constantly weighed.
I can't really see how slapping the robot together really works. Wasn't there a team last year that said they showed up to a cometition at 157 lbs or something like that. Precise planning helps to avoid disaters like that.
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
serious problem found - robot controller resets when jarred! KenWittlief Electrical 23 19-03-2003 13:30
Image Discuss: 810 - Minotaur: Coming to a regional near you. CD47-Bot Robot Showcase 47 25-02-2003 16:19
WASH Palm scouting at the Championship Mike Soukup Scouting 2 19-04-2002 15:14
Index of team's post about their robot... Ken Leung Robot Showcase 1 20-03-2002 17:10
about how Drive Train push the robot... shouldn't the force accelerate the robot? Ken Leung Technical Discussion 12 26-11-2001 09:39


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 23:00.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi