|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
This is our score sheet and i can see why many may be suspicious of it. We did pretty good on the first round but on the second round the first 3 judges gave us an average of about 2.3 while the rest were an average of 7.3 . thats a difference of 5 points. also, the judges that scored higher have huge amounts of comments, while the low judges have none at all. i can see that they may be more experienced or something but they should at least tell you what you are doing wrong. i think they may need to explain this to everyone. even though it won't change anything it could bring piece of mind.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| when are "official" results due online? | Brandon Martus | Regional Competitions | 3 | 09-03-2003 08:15 |
| NYC and SOCAL partial results | archiver | 2001 | 2 | 24-06-2002 02:24 |
| results from regionals | archiver | 2000 | 0 | 23-06-2002 22:31 |
| Delay in results and awards: drying out | FRCOps | Championship Event | 0 | 01-05-2002 10:46 |
| Anyone know the results from Great Lakes?? | Mimi Brown | Regional Competitions | 2 | 24-03-2002 19:04 |