|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Another thought on competition structure.
It might be interesting if Day One of competition were the Qualifying (or Seeding) rounds. Make Day Two of competition a double elimination tournament, but with more seeds than are currently used. Instead of eight alliances, expand to sixteen alliances. (If you had 48 teams.) You could actually have twelve alliances, with the bottom four starting out in the "loser's bracket" (with an implicit one loss) and even out the loser's bracket so that it is in step with the "winner's bracket." Andrew |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2002 game prediction contest!!! | Ken Leung | Rumor Mill | 41 | 31-12-2007 18:18 |
| Cal Game 2003 date decided... Who is interested? | Ken Leung | Off-Season Events | 15 | 02-06-2003 06:48 |
| FIRST Report Card 2003 | Andy Grady | General Forum | 23 | 13-05-2003 17:11 |
| game design challenge: what was your entry | Ryan Foley | General Forum | 1 | 20-03-2003 21:42 |
| in response to the 2003 game suspicion | Sachiel7 | Rumor Mill | 5 | 02-02-2003 22:47 |