|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks for asking...
OK I have several ideas I will post seperately to try to keep the posts short. 1) 4 v 1 (???) Four robots working together with one robot acting as a spoiler. If the tasks are complicated enough a good defensive robot could be useful. Pros * 6 robots would win (4 plus one plus a back up) * I liked 2001..it was like bowling (OK I had to learn to like it) *there is still a competitive force on the field, especially during finals. Cons *Apparently no one else likes to bowl (:-) * unbalanced play. One good defensive robot could change the game (hmm is that a pro?) *5 robots on the field, not all on the same team. Could be confusing to the uninformed In closing on this post. Football takes abit to explain and many people watch it. As is hockey (For those of you that would say hockey is easy to explain include icing, penalties, pulling a goalie etc) in your explaination. My point is, make the explanation of the rules around 4th when worrying about whats important. A game that will challenge teams is more important OK one more closing post. Love all the autonomous ideas I agree!!(15 seconds) To further test our limits Change the weight of the robot, to say..100 pounds? Rookies won't know any better and veterens will have to learn how to think *inside* the box. More soon. Again thanks for asking |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2002 game prediction contest!!! | Ken Leung | Rumor Mill | 41 | 31-12-2007 18:18 |
| Cal Game 2003 date decided... Who is interested? | Ken Leung | Off-Season Events | 15 | 02-06-2003 06:48 |
| FIRST Report Card 2003 | Andy Grady | General Forum | 23 | 13-05-2003 17:11 |
| game design challenge: what was your entry | Ryan Foley | General Forum | 1 | 20-03-2003 21:42 |
| in response to the 2003 game suspicion | Sachiel7 | Rumor Mill | 5 | 02-02-2003 22:47 |