|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2006 game hints?
Quote:
As for the object, I meant what you would get if you flatten it. A cube would be 4 sides, a tetra would be 3... So a six-sided object would be some kind of extruded hexagon. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2006 game hints?
With all the talk about batons and my research into last year that found many people hit the pyramid hint right on the head, could it be that we will simply see the return of PVC goals?
Last year we guessed pyramids and got pyramids missing the insides. This year we guess batons and get batons missing the insides, or pvc goals? (Also ironically at the FLL tournament I attended last weekend there where baton twirlers selling Kettle Korn at 3 bucks for a bag about a foot tall and 4 inches in diameter raising money to go to DC...) Is this some subtle game hint? Last edited by Ian Curtis : 23-11-2005 at 15:23. |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2006 game hints?
Quote:
All the speculation so far is about batons being used for the actual playing field object. But what if they weren't? Following FIRST's ball-nonball game pattern of the recent years, we're due for a ball game. What if the batons really represent parts of a goal? What if there is going to be really short goals this year? What if these batons would be connected to make a ladder-like goal? Or maybe a fence/barrier? Batons are usually easily moved about and manupulated by a cheerleader or such, so would this mean that there will be all mobile goals on the field? Would this represent some sort of dynamic field element(s)? Or would there be goals that don't belong to any specific alliance color by default, but to the alliance that puts more balls into it (similar to tetra goal ownership)? Would robots be able to easily manipulate the balls, and score them into goals without a human player? Would human players somehow alter goal ownership? For a person to be able to manipulate a baton, it takes practice and skill. Would this mean that there will be a very difficult task to do, that only a small number of teams can accomplish? Will the balls be odd shaped, like footballs? Would this mean that an arm/elevator would be practically necessary for the game? And the speculation continues... Just to clarify, when I said a six-sided object was a cube in my previous post, I was thinking of six faces on a cube. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2006 game hints?
Quote:
Now all we have to do is figure out what on earth the robots are supposed to do. |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2006 game hints?
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2006 game hints?
Quote:
Oh, and dont forget to cap the goals with a tetra or doubler ball. ![]() |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2006 game hints?
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [Official 2006 Game Design] OK, so YOU design the 2006 game... | dlavery | FRC Game Design | 29 | 08-01-2006 00:21 |
| 2006 Game Thread | miketwalker | FRC Game Design | 61 | 30-03-2005 19:15 |
| 2004 Season for Fantasy Football, FIRST Robotics league | Alex Cormier | Chit-Chat | 155 | 29-12-2004 13:12 |
| Thank you for this game! | DougHogg | Thanks and/or Congrats | 10 | 10-03-2004 22:11 |
| i didnt like this years game....please read | archiver | 2001 | 19 | 24-06-2002 03:23 |