|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Why change the rules?
Posted by Jason Leslie, Other on team #157, The Aztechs, from Assabet Valley RTHS and Simplex / EMC / Intel Massachusetts / Ascend .
Posted on 3/28/99 7:13 PM MST In Reply to: Why change the rules? posted by Tom Lish on 3/28/99 5:54 PM MST: (((THE FOLLOWING DOES NOT REPRESENT TEAM 157 IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM))) This is a great point! Although I am in favor of the jump to alliances because it teaches how to work with someone you may or may not want to work with. HOWEVER the change to have a tri-chapion is absurd. Personally I think that the way it is now is fine, if your ally breakes down OH-WELL we all had to deal with it in the qualifiying matches now didn't we? Tom made another god point if you want more teams in the final 8 why don't we up it to a final 12 alliances??? I hope that majority of the teams at the great lakes regional DO NOT speak for ALL the teams competing in the 1999 FIRST Competition!!! I think the FIRST owes it to all the teams to contact them asap and get the VOTE from ALL teams.... JAY GO AZTECS |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Uniform rules and enforcers? | Ben Mitchell | General Forum | 31 | 12-01-2005 20:55 |
| Dilemma - Letter of the rules v. spirit of the rules | Natchez | General Forum | 27 | 03-04-2003 15:37 |
| What rules would you change? | tonyargote | Rules/Strategy | 3 | 05-02-2003 18:56 |
| Petition to change rules!! | redbeard0531 | Rules/Strategy | 42 | 13-01-2003 20:17 |
| Time for new rules! | archiver | 2001 | 11 | 24-06-2002 02:01 |