|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
i like
Posted by Jon.
Engineer on team #190, Gompei, from Mass Academy of Math and Science and Worcester Polytechnic Institute. Posted on 7/28/99 2:59 PM MST In Reply to: An idea for the 2000 games..(is six weeks enough?) posted by colleen on 7/28/99 1:26 PM MST: i like what i read... specially getting the rule question process out of the way early... some of those changes can be very detrimental to a strategy/design... to counter one of Colleen's cons: the veterans do know the parts better but in my opinion it just becomes an advantage to having some history. i think changing the package drastically every year may be too expensive for FIRST. What could be done is release a PDF of the thing in november or whenever. People without internet access would request FIRST to get the advance release and have a cd or paperback copy sent to them or something... the rule questioning and update process starts off earlier and by kickoff time, the big issues would be resolved and rule books could be distributed then like normal. Oh yea, and whenever rules are distributed online, people should get a choice between one big file of the whole thing or just the different parts. having one big file makes it easier to transport and search. that multiple file thing was kinda annoying... somethings make sense like the field blueprints, but you should at least get a choice. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|