|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
Got it... (IMO) positives explained
Posted by Andy Baker.
Engineer on team #45, TechnoKats, from Kokomo High School and Delphi Automotive Systems. Posted on 8/15/2000 10:11 PM MST In Reply to: Attempt to clarify posted by Justin on 8/15/2000 9:44 PM MST: Justin, You're right... what Joe's proposal did was try to rectify four problems at Nationals: 1. Make the tournament manageable from an organization standpoint (field setup, pit location, team-match assigning). 2. Let us realistically scout each other's competitors (100 teams to scout is much easier than 400 teams). 3. This enables more teams to make it to the finals, along with 'picker' teams having a easier task of choosing their alliances for the finals. 4. The added time between Q matches being over and the alliance picking would be longer in Joe's proposal, and the top 16x4 teams would have ample time to evaluate their selections. There are some negatives, but I feel that the positives outweigh them greatly. Andy B. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2004 Championship Eligibility Criteria!!! | dez250 | General Forum | 214 | 28-12-2003 20:11 |
| Spare Parts Database available at Nationals for teams to use | miketwalker | General Forum | 0 | 04-04-2003 14:19 |
| Hits, Misses, & Suggestions -- long message | archiver | 2000 | 17 | 23-06-2002 23:36 |
| How do we view more teams? | archiver | 2000 | 0 | 23-06-2002 23:11 |
| Making heads or tails of the new announcement... | Jessica Boucher | General Forum | 66 | 26-09-2001 11:13 |