|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Are the Semis & Finals worth playing?
Posted by Rich at 2/4/2001 8:35 PM EST
Engineer on team #334, BTHS Knights, from Brooklyn Tech. HS and Con Ed, SIAC Keyspan. In Reply to: Are the Semis & Finals worth playing? Posted by Joe Johnson on 2/4/2001 7:59 PM EST: My biggest concern on scoring is "what Teams will be in my Alliance?" If all four Teams agreed to a single strategy then the game plan will run successfully and scoring will be high. But try to get four students to agreed on lunch, it takes over 15 minutes. LUCK also plays and important role in the success of the Alliance. If all four Teams of an Alliance can do the same function and nothing else, than the scoring will be limited. If all four Team has strong robots then the Alliance will score well "IF they all agreed." Some Teams may want to play with the small balls and some don't want to play with any balls. I see a lot of conflicting plans that needs to be resolved before the day of the competition. That's why all participants at the same regional should communicate, communicate, and communicate. It's Teamwork or Die. Some school are being secretive, I don't see what they will gain from that strategy this year. My motto this year is: "Time is your enemy, not the other Teams." Any opinions? Team #334 Tech Knights |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| "Rigging" the game vs playing the game strategically - what's the difference? | ColleenShaver | Rules/Strategy | 13 | 15-01-2003 10:33 |
| What really would have helped in finals is....... | archiver | 2001 | 4 | 24-06-2002 03:24 |
| getting picked for finals... | archiver | 2001 | 11 | 24-06-2002 02:55 |
| Many inexpensive playing fields | archiver | 1999 | 5 | 23-06-2002 22:57 |
| dead robot in the finals? | srawls | Rules/Strategy | 2 | 24-03-2002 14:44 |