|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: i didnt like this years game....please read
Posted by s_alaniz at 04/10/2001 1:33 PM EST
Other on team #57 from Houston Regional co-ordinator. In Reply to: i didnt like this years game....please read Posted by Travis Covington on 04/10/2001 2:05 AM EST: : in this game people WANTED the other team not to lose BUT TO FAIL. Hey I emphatize but I disagree. Sounds like you took it all pretty hard and that's not a bad thing, we're all human and the emotions that follow bad luck, bad breaks... et al are part of being human. There's no solution to that (or if there is I wish someone would share it.) As for the cheering for your failure. I don't think that was a universal theme. For those who DID cheer at a team's "failure" ..why do you think Dean constantly reminds us about that "gracious professionalism?" I suppose that message needs to be revisited yet again. All I can say is that MY team ranked 10th in our division but was not picked. We were disappointed but we sat and cheered during the finals and we cheered loudest for our personal favorites ( and moaned when they made a mistake). I know about machine failures. My team has been there several times in the past 3 years and we know the feeling. We also know the feeling of having an alliance partner mess up and cost valuable points. (Just prior to one of our rounds, there was a "0" score for an alliance because a coach forgot the rules and hit the stop button in stead of having thr drivers do it. and people say this was not an exciting game!) Our team had 4 disasterous rounds but I'm sure other teams had similar experiences. BUT the real point I think I need to make is this: "Gracious Professionalism" doesn't just apply to the winners. It applies to second place, third place and on down the line. If in the heat of the moment someone loses control ... or even a lot of people lose control and cheer wildly when an alliance loses, it's not meant as a slur but as joy in the success of their own team. If I were on the winning alliance I would have found it hard to restain myself too. Alliances... well, if you eliminate alliances.. then you get back to a one winner system... I like alliances.. it makes teams have to consider carefully who they pair with. Team 115 was a quarterfinalist... my team would have been uncontrollably happy if we had managed that. We would be bragging that we nailed fourth place. We didn't but I'll brag anyway... I had the best team I could have wanted and I'm very proud of the way we proformed ... we're looking forward to next year... see you there. Best Wishes Steve Alaniz |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2002 game prediction contest!!! | Ken Leung | Rumor Mill | 41 | 31-12-2007 18:18 |
| What changes to this year's game...? | DougHogg | General Forum | 16 | 20-04-2003 15:35 |
| Ok, so YOU design the 2003 game... | dlavery | General Forum | 157 | 07-01-2003 23:55 |
| Annual Thread: Whats this years game going to be? | team222badbrad | General Forum | 129 | 28-12-2002 14:38 |
| Long post - this year's game was tough - here's why: | archiver | 2001 | 7 | 24-06-2002 03:31 |