|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re. General Suggitions for Next Year
Posted by Ameya Agaskar at 04/22/2001 7:00 PM EST
Student on team #293, Bullbots, from Hopewell Valley Central High School and Janssen/Morehouse Engineering/Lucent/Worldwater/. In Reply to: Re. General Suggitions for Next Year Posted by Kyle Fenton on 04/19/2001 2:03 PM EST: : 1. Make it either 2v2 or all 4 working together. If it is : 2v2 than your main objective would be to will be to : rack up the balls and head to the center to a fight : for the big points for the main objecting in the : center. If I is all 4 working together, you would have : a chance at higher score but have a harder time : getting a score. It should be integrated so that if : one robot doesn't perform its task than it will hung : the other robots, causing the whole alliance to : loose major points. This will cause the game to be : more exciting and will satisfy everybody (meaning if : they want 2v2 or all 4). There could be a scoring system like last year's, with one difference. In the qualifying rounds, the losing alliance keeps its score and the winning alliance gets 3 times the losing alliances score; but if they tie, both alliances get 5 (or some factor higher than 3) times their score. In the elimination rounds, this would be abandoned, and whoever gets the highest score advances. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2002 game prediction contest!!! | Ken Leung | Rumor Mill | 41 | 31-12-2007 18:18 |
| What changes to this year's game...? | DougHogg | General Forum | 16 | 20-04-2003 15:35 |
| "Rigging" the game vs playing the game strategically - what's the difference? | ColleenShaver | Rules/Strategy | 13 | 15-01-2003 10:33 |
| Ok, so YOU design the 2003 game... | dlavery | General Forum | 157 | 07-01-2003 23:55 |