Go to Post As it stands your design defies physics (and breaks 1 of Karthik's 2 Golden Rules). - JesseK [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Old Forum Archives > 2001
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-06-2002, 03:59
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: How about 5 vs 0, with a twist?

Posted by ChrisH at 04/30/2001 4:22 PM EST


Engineer on team #330, Beach 'Bots, from Hope Chapel Academy and NASA JPL, J & F Machine, Raytheon, et al.


In Reply to: Re: How about 5 vs 0, with a twist?
Posted by Matt Ryan on 04/30/2001 2:10 PM EST:



Sorry, I was unclear in my first post. Each team would be assigned the lead position pretty much like you are assigned colors now. There would be no choice about it. All teams are "lead" team for 2 out of 8 matches or whatever it works out to be so all teams get equal time. So no robot is sidelined just because they're the highest seed, rather they get an additional opportunity to score points by directing other teams. Of course if they are sloppy about it or try to direct teams into oblivion they will pay for it later, maybe in the finals or just before...

Chris Husmann, PE
Team 330 the Beach'Bots

: Pretty good idea.

: No one really wants to see their robot sidelined because they are the highest seed in the alliance, and thats the only problem.

: : How about having a five robot alliance, but the lead team does NOT put their robot on the field? Instead they are the assigned alliance leader and set strategy for the other teams. This forces them to develop a strategy that best uses the other robots strengths, but keeps their egos out of the way. Each team in the alliance would get the same score for the round.

: : Of course this might lead to a top ranked team with a non-functioning robot but a brilliant strategy team. Talk about leveling the playing field in terms of construction.

: : Just a "Modest Proposal"

: : Chris Husmann, PE
: : Team 330 the Beach'Bots


__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
My Take on The 2001 Competition archiver 2001 0 24-06-2002 03:45
Full 2001 Competition Documentation Mirror archiver 2001 0 23-06-2002 22:22
Full 2001 Competition Documentation Mirror archiver 2001 0 23-06-2002 22:22
Full 2001 Competition Documentation Mirror archiver 2001 3 23-06-2002 22:22
2001 Scratch Awards Andy Grady General Forum 12 04-10-2001 22:04


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:02.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi