|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#17
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Gary, You missed 217
Gary,
You missed the 217 pull. We were a write in above 121 with 196lbs (if memory serves). We tested with the exact methods you guys did and found our mu was between 1.5 and 1.6 (several different tests). The brecoflex is good stuff, but we used the neoprene padding from McMaster Carr (and small parts). The neoprene pad is much less expensive than the Brecoflex stuff. -Paul P.S. - We are also looking forward to your white paper. We have derived several equations for the motion of a robot operating under dc motors and hope our equations match yours. (For a level of sanity check). |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| traction questions | AlbertW | Rules/Strategy | 2 | 05-01-2003 17:58 |
| Results of traction test | IBApril180 | Technical Discussion | 3 | 04-01-2003 18:56 |
| Power, speed, and torque... AGH | Gui Cavalcanti | Technical Discussion | 5 | 10-11-2002 19:02 |
| Gear Woes | Simon G | Technical Discussion | 14 | 24-01-2002 16:31 |
| Traction Limited, rather than torque | Simon G | Technical Discussion | 6 | 23-01-2002 07:08 |