Go to Post Holy cow! Five years in FIRST and it only gets better! Skyway has supplied wheels to FIRST for ten years. Ten years ago Dean called Ken for wheels. Ken said yes. Man, we love helping you guys and gals get good wheels. ;) Bart at Skywaywheels.com - SkywayWheels [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Technical Discussion
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-01-2003, 21:26
Alan Ing Alan Ing is offline
Registered User
None #0368 (Kika Mana)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Posts: 76
Alan Ing has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Ing has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Ing has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Ing has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Ing has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Ing has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Ing has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Ing has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Ing has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Ing has a reputation beyond reputeAlan Ing has a reputation beyond repute
25 or 35 chain?

Hi all, this is the fourth year for our team and every year the same questions comes up. We have always used 35 chain and corresponding sprockets, but I can't help but feel they are oversized for the job. Last year we had the drill and atwoods coupled driving 8" wheels at 5-6 FPS not the fastest, but definitely not the slowest. With the wheels we had we got about 160#s of thrust to the carpet.

So, what do you all think? Has anyone had trouble with 25 chain and small sprockets?

What would be the smallest number of teeth that we could run safely? 12, 15, 18?????

Were planning to use both drill and atwoods again with a shifting gear box.

Our transmission spins quite a bit faster this year and one of the problems with the 35 chain is that we really need to use at least a 4:1 reduction with the chain which would mean a running a 10 tooth sprocket (sort of small in the past we have been using 12s ) and I am a bit concerned that there would be more chance for the chain to skip.

Your thoughts would greatly be appreciated.
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-01-2003, 21:40
ajlapp ajlapp is offline
Registered User
AKA: Anthony Lapp
None #0118 (Team RUSH and Robonauts)
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Ortonville, MI
Posts: 648
ajlapp has a reputation beyond reputeajlapp has a reputation beyond reputeajlapp has a reputation beyond reputeajlapp has a reputation beyond reputeajlapp has a reputation beyond reputeajlapp has a reputation beyond reputeajlapp has a reputation beyond reputeajlapp has a reputation beyond reputeajlapp has a reputation beyond reputeajlapp has a reputation beyond reputeajlapp has a reputation beyond repute
#25 does the job

although we stopped using chains three years ago in favor of spur gears, when we did use chains #25 always did the trick. we never had a failure in either drivetrain or arm design, although i have seen #25 break under periods of extreme stress, i.e. when lifting a heavy arm or supporting loads greater than 50lbs. good luck.

Anthony Lapp
lead design
team 221->857
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-01-2003, 21:50
sanddrag sanddrag is offline
On to my 16th year in FRC
FRC #0696 (Circuit Breakers)
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 8,519
sanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond repute
My electric scooter uses #25. We have always used #35 for our bots. I've heard that #25 can break under a lot of force. As for the size of sprockets, you need not worry with #35 chain. (we have used 10 t before) I can't really say about #25 since I've never used it. As long as you have steel sprockets and the chain is tensioned properly, you should be okay.
__________________
Teacher/Engineer/Machinist - Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2011 - Present
Mentor/Engineer/Machinist, Team 968 RAWC, 2007-2010
Technical Mentor, Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2005-2007
Student Mechanical Leader and Driver, Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2002-2004
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-01-2003, 22:39
Jim Meyer's Avatar
Jim Meyer Jim Meyer is offline
Engineering Mentor
None #0067 (HOT)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Milford Michigan
Posts: 177
Jim Meyer has a reputation beyond reputeJim Meyer has a reputation beyond reputeJim Meyer has a reputation beyond reputeJim Meyer has a reputation beyond reputeJim Meyer has a reputation beyond reputeJim Meyer has a reputation beyond reputeJim Meyer has a reputation beyond reputeJim Meyer has a reputation beyond reputeJim Meyer has a reputation beyond reputeJim Meyer has a reputation beyond reputeJim Meyer has a reputation beyond repute
McMaster.com lists the tensile strength of #25 chain as around 1000 lb. We use 1/4 pitch chain all the time with no problems. I'd guess you could go with larger #25 sprockets (thus reducing the chain tension) and still have a notable weight savings.
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-01-2003, 22:45
Bduggan04's Avatar
Bduggan04 Bduggan04 is offline
I bent my wookie...
AKA: Bryan Duggan
#0027 (Team Rush)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Clarkston, MI
Posts: 290
Bduggan04 will become famous soon enoughBduggan04 will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally posted by Jim Meyer
McMaster.com lists the tensile strength of #25 chain as around 1000 lb. We use 1/4 pitch chain all the time with no problems. I'd guess you could go with larger #25 sprockets (thus reducing the chain tension) and still have a notable weight savings.
The weight gain is beyond noticable. 3/8" chain is 4-5 times as heavy as 1/4" chain. You really limit yourself if you needlessly use heavier chain.
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-01-2003, 09:17
Jeff Waegelin's Avatar
Jeff Waegelin Jeff Waegelin is offline
El Jefe de 148
AKA: Midwest Refugee
FRC #0148 (Robowranglers)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Greenville, TX
Posts: 3,132
Jeff Waegelin has a reputation beyond reputeJeff Waegelin has a reputation beyond reputeJeff Waegelin has a reputation beyond reputeJeff Waegelin has a reputation beyond reputeJeff Waegelin has a reputation beyond reputeJeff Waegelin has a reputation beyond reputeJeff Waegelin has a reputation beyond reputeJeff Waegelin has a reputation beyond reputeJeff Waegelin has a reputation beyond reputeJeff Waegelin has a reputation beyond reputeJeff Waegelin has a reputation beyond repute
We've always used #35 chain, though we're switching to #25 this year. After our all-steel bot last year, we've learned some things about weight. Switching to aluminum frame and #25 chain instead of steel frame and #35 chain should help in that regard. We basically discovered that our robots of the past were total overkill.
__________________
Jeff Waegelin
Mechanical Engineer, Innovation First Labs
Lead Engineer, Team 148 - The Robowranglers
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-01-2003, 03:01
BillCloyes's Avatar
BillCloyes BillCloyes is offline
Registered User
#0677 (The WireStrippers)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 37
BillCloyes has a spectacular aura aboutBillCloyes has a spectacular aura aboutBillCloyes has a spectacular aura about
1/4 pitch is the way to go...

five plus years of robots and my team has not waviered from #25 chain...

last year was no different, even with the added torque of coupling the chips and the drills.

again this year we are opting for 1/4 pitch carbon roller chain, this year; chips, new drills and a cvt...

no toubles as of yet.
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-01-2003, 18:25
Dick Linn's Avatar
Dick Linn Dick Linn is offline
Registered User
no team (Synergy)
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Midlothian, VA
Posts: 679
Dick Linn has a reputation beyond reputeDick Linn has a reputation beyond reputeDick Linn has a reputation beyond reputeDick Linn has a reputation beyond reputeDick Linn has a reputation beyond reputeDick Linn has a reputation beyond reputeDick Linn has a reputation beyond reputeDick Linn has a reputation beyond reputeDick Linn has a reputation beyond reputeDick Linn has a reputation beyond reputeDick Linn has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Dick Linn
25 vs 35 chain

According to the Diamond Chain web site, 35 is 2.5 times heavier than 25. 35 is about .21 pounds per foot.

25 should be quite strong enough, but the connecting link is always the weakest. In addition, #35 sprockets are quite widely available, and very cheap. If you are using the larger bore sizes like 5/8, it's a lot easier to find standard parts. Using aluminum #35 sprockets can offset some weight gains. Search the web on go-kart, Azusa and go-ped for various parts which may be adaptable. (Aftermarket Go-Ped wheels are awesome!)
__________________
Richard Linn

Proud father of Marine LCpl. Karl R. Linn
Co-founder Team 975
KIA, Iraq 1/26/2005
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 02-02-2003, 18:16
MJAdams's Avatar
MJAdams MJAdams is offline
Registered User
#0461 (Westside Boiler Invasion)
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: West Lafayette, IN
Posts: 6
MJAdams is an unknown quantity at this point
Exclamation

We made the move to #35 chain this year from #25 in the past.

The drill motors we are using are approximately twice as strong as the ones used last year. There were teams last year that did indeed have some chains breaks with #25 chain. Our primary concern is the possibility of a wheel getting locked up for some reason and having the smaller chain break. Better safe than sorry.

We'll just have to wait and see what happens this year.

Matt
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 02-02-2003, 19:44
ROB at RAGE ROB at RAGE is offline
Registered User
#0173
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: East Hartford CT
Posts: 16
ROB at RAGE is an unknown quantity at this point
#25 Chain

We have used #25 chain for years, caculate the force:

Force = torgue/(PichDiameter/2)

Using the stall torgue of the motor. The chain is rated to be operated at a force of (1,250 lbs/ChainPitch) per ANSI Specifications. This means the rating is 312 lbs. for #25. This is a coninous service rating with probably a 2.5 safety factor over what a new cahin can with stand.

If you use too small of a drive sprocket you might have not only have a very high chain force, but bearing problems also.

I personally don't like average ratings given in catalogs. Use the real machine info and you will have reliability.

You can find this kind of useful info as well as a lot of good stuff in the Machinery's Hand Book.

The only draw back to #25 chain is it may need to be tighned more often. Where #35 chain can usually be set and left alone.
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-02-2003, 20:42
Dick Linn's Avatar
Dick Linn Dick Linn is offline
Registered User
no team (Synergy)
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Midlothian, VA
Posts: 679
Dick Linn has a reputation beyond reputeDick Linn has a reputation beyond reputeDick Linn has a reputation beyond reputeDick Linn has a reputation beyond reputeDick Linn has a reputation beyond reputeDick Linn has a reputation beyond reputeDick Linn has a reputation beyond reputeDick Linn has a reputation beyond reputeDick Linn has a reputation beyond reputeDick Linn has a reputation beyond reputeDick Linn has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Dick Linn
Well said, Rob.

Yep. You need to use good engineering practices and check the references, plus apply a bit of common sense. Look at the chain/sprocket sizes used on go-peds, mini-bikes and the like and the forces involved.

If you get out on the hairy edge, then you have to really engineer it. Take a look at this if you're into the dynamics of chain: http://www.ustsubaki.com/section2.html Neat stuff!
__________________
Richard Linn

Proud father of Marine LCpl. Karl R. Linn
Co-founder Team 975
KIA, Iraq 1/26/2005
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-02-2003, 22:53
Maxzillian Maxzillian is offline
Registered User
AKA: Eric H.
FRC #0935 (RaileRobotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Newton, KS
Posts: 24
Maxzillian is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to Maxzillian
I would suggest to stay with the #35 chain. In last years competition, we were knocked out of a semi final (were selected by another team) from snapping a chain in two. We also snapped another during testing phases, but blamed it on the drivetrain's assembly. Although we did have suspicion of the sprockets flexing a bit, putting the chain out of alignment. But none the less, I suggest you stay with the bigger chain.
__________________
Team 935 RaileRobotics Alumni: 2001-2004
Team 935 RaileRobotics Mentor: 2009-Present
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-02-2003, 13:21
Joe Johnson's Avatar Unsung FIRST Hero
Joe Johnson Joe Johnson is offline
Engineer at Medrobotics
AKA: Dr. Joe
FRC #0088 (TJ2)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Raynham, MA
Posts: 2,648
Joe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond repute
pick your poison...

Both have pros and cons.

We have always gotten by with #25 chain but this year we have switched to #35 (though we have not used chain for our drive system since our rookie year).

The reason is basically, we are worried about skipping chain with vigorous interaction expected. It is overkill we know, but we have seen so many teams lose matches because they have thrown a chain that we decided it was an overdesign we were willing to live with.

Bottom line, #25 can work well if you can keep the chain tight, the sprockets in line, and competitors from poking your chain from the side. Even if you can do all these things, you will sleep better at night if you use #35 chain.

Joe J.
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-02-2003, 12:10
Carl Owenby Carl Owenby is offline
Registered User
#0654 (Maclay Robotics)
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 24
Carl Owenby is an unknown quantity at this point
#40

We used #40 chain because of local availability of sprockets for the 5/8" diameter shafts. In short lengths it's not that much heavier. We don't worry much about it breaking during competition.
__________________
There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those who understand binary and those who don't.
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-02-2003, 00:55
Ianworld's Avatar
Ianworld Ianworld is offline
AKA Ian Ferguson
AKA: Ian Ferguson
FRC #0694 (StuyPulse)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: New York City, Stuyvesant H.S.
Posts: 366
Ianworld has much to be proud ofIanworld has much to be proud ofIanworld has much to be proud ofIanworld has much to be proud ofIanworld has much to be proud ofIanworld has much to be proud ofIanworld has much to be proud ofIanworld has much to be proud ofIanworld has much to be proud of
Send a message via AIM to Ianworld
well just to scare you i'll tell you that my team snapped our #25 chain when ever we really needed it to work. We put a lot of power into our drive train. We pushed up on the goal so we had a robot that effectivly weighed 220 pounds. Then combine that with the drills in low on a gear down the chain popped consisitently. It was unfortunate because we were the strongest robot easily at our regional(despite us not knowing that because it always broke.) We'll this year we're getting back at small parts for never shipping those 3/8ths inch sprockets and chain by using MSC only. (they still haven't come.... WERE WAITING!)

Second this year on our arm we really need to use 3/8ths in chain for controlling it. Its 9 feet long fully exteneded and weighs quite a bit. With a moment of about 110 to 1 its pretty tough on the chain. normally it puts about 910 pounds of force on the chain but if the arm gets hit that could easily spike and break the chain.

Of course our silly drivetrain designers used the 3/8ths chain in the stupidest place(rotating our drive modules) with sprockets that are reverersed!!(so its about ummm... 8 times as fast as it should be). Hopefully tomorrow i can bug them into changing it.... the 6 sprockets and 10 feet of chain easily could save us 5 pounds if they were in 1/4 inch.

so in conclusion.... you probably could break your chain, but i wouldn't worry... nobody else seems to have problems.

P.S. Anybody got a solution to a chain where the its half an offset llink off? (as in a quarter link off)
__________________
Team Website
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
does anyone have a source for #25 chain with attachments ajlapp Technical Discussion 5 24-01-2003 17:05
1/4" chain and links from small parts archiver 2001 2 24-06-2002 00:18
Roller Chain Adrian Wong Inventor 3 23-02-2002 17:21
Chain and chain breaker source? kmcclary Off-Season Events 4 22-10-2001 22:51
chain Lake Orion OCCRA 1 30-09-2001 13:20


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:42.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi