Go to Post Building sustained excellence happens when you start with the right pieces at the top...and pick up the rest of the pieces on your way. - Jared Russell [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Technical Discussion
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 4.33 average. Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 27-01-2002, 10:28
Ben Mitchell Ben Mitchell is offline
Registered User
no team
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Bridgewater, NJ
Posts: 566
Ben Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond repute
Quad- 1/2 track drive system

Dr. Johnson and everyone else,

What do you think of this drive system:

Robot oriented such that the 36" side is front, and 30" is side. This is to dampen effects of scrub.

A drive system consisting of 4 small tank treads. (perhaps 4-5 inches each), spaced apart to spread weight and traction evenly.


Each tread being drive by a motor (2 chiaphua, 2 drill),
Each small tread has a driven sprocket, and three idlers on the ground (resembling a triangle)

Each small tread has a center idler which is slightly lower than the other two, creating a "digging in" effect on each tread, gripping the carpet.

The treads themselves could be either brecoflex timing belts (high-end double sided with gripping pattern) , or custom tracks (a la Technokats).

4 motors could be replaced by the 2 chiaphua's.

Programming could be used to account for high amps, if we were rammed, and dull the ampage spike. (True or false??)

The pros of this drive: high traction, lower scrub (than full treads) Increased speed (than full treads), whuile still getting the traction that treads would produce.

What does anyone here think of this? I'm interested in getting opinions from the folks who know.

Would 4 motors cause a major battery/breaker problem?? Any ways to compensate??

Don't spare the criticism, or foresight to any problems you might expect to occur, I'm thinking about this design for next year (its a little late now). I thought I'd ask the folks who know what they're doing.

Thanks for your imput,

--Ben Mitchell
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 27-01-2002, 10:51
ggoldman's Avatar
ggoldman ggoldman is offline
Registered User
FRC #0401
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Richmond. Va
Posts: 258
ggoldman has much to be proud ofggoldman has much to be proud ofggoldman has much to be proud ofggoldman has much to be proud ofggoldman has much to be proud ofggoldman has much to be proud ofggoldman has much to be proud ofggoldman has much to be proud ofggoldman has much to be proud of
Send a message via AIM to ggoldman
you can get jsut as much traction from four wheels as tread....this is because the weight distribution...if you distribute weight ona smaller area it has more traction....but f you spread it out..like on a tank tread...you decrease your traction...

I think i might be confusing with friction..but traction is friction...

Can an engineer check me on that..or am I way off
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 27-01-2002, 12:14
jasoni jasoni is offline
Registered User
#0011 (Marauders)
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Mt. Olive, NJ
Posts: 37
jasoni is an unknown quantity at this point
I don't think you'll gain anything other than complexity by going with 4 smaller tracks instead of 2 tracks running the length of the machine. Most of the turn-slip in a tank-style track occurs at the corners, which is just where you have your tracks.

We had a somewhat similar concept, with one caveat. Instead of empty space in the middle, we had two wheels. The wheels were slightly lower than the treads at the corners. It might be hard to visualize, but if you were looking at a side-profile of the machine, you'd see a short track at the front, a wheel at the center, slightly lower than the track, and a short track at the rear. We were pretty confident in this design as a power machine, but we've gone the way of speed so we ditched the treads and went with center-drive only.
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 27-01-2002, 12:58
Joe Johnson's Avatar Unsung FIRST Hero
Joe Johnson Joe Johnson is offline
Engineer at Medrobotics
AKA: Dr. Joe
FRC #0088 (TJ2)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Raynham, MA
Posts: 2,648
Joe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond repute
Weight in the corners is the problem not the length of the track, as others have pointed out.

You will gain by having your machine wide & short rather than narrow and long, but will it be enough? Difficult to say. Having 4 big watt motors rather than 2 will help muscle through the scrubbing but again, it is difficult to say how much you are giving up.

As to voltage spikes when rammed, they are so far down my list of problems, I don't even think about them. Your machine breaking is more of a threat than electical damage.

Sorry I can't be of more help.

Joe J.
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 27-01-2002, 17:01
Ben Mitchell Ben Mitchell is offline
Registered User
no team
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Bridgewater, NJ
Posts: 566
Ben Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond repute
4 wheels have the same traction as 4 treads??? No way!

Would'nt having 4 tracks dampen the scrub issue, or would it be so little a gain as to render the entire concept useless?

What if the drive was modified to a simpler 1/2 track deisign, 1/2 tracks in back, wheels in front? Would that be better in terms of scrub/traction.

Also, would treads and wheels be much faster than 4 1/4 tracks, or would having treads in any combination cut out the speed factor??

What if the quarter-tracks were shortend to 2-3 inches, making them basically the size of wheels, but with the traction of treads.

Thanks for the help.

--Ben Mitchell
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 27-01-2002, 17:34
Mike Norton's Avatar
Mike Norton Mike Norton is offline
Registered User
FRC #0061
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Rookie Year: 1995
Location: Upton, MA
Posts: 476
Mike Norton is a name known to allMike Norton is a name known to allMike Norton is a name known to allMike Norton is a name known to allMike Norton is a name known to allMike Norton is a name known to all
We have run with track systems for the past 8 years. The best way we found out is having the track the 36" long. Putting a center wheel in that can move up or down depending on the traction. Get different track that have different friction factors.

We have had fast robots and power robots. we always used two drill motors to run the system. Blowing breaks is a problem if your driver does not know how to drive. With a good driver you can go 2 mins under big loads without breaking the breakers.

This year is great because we added more motors to the drivetrain.

with track system done right nobody will pull you sidewards. once you get what you want you just need to be 90 degrees to your puller.

pulling three goals with 3 130lb kids in the middle is easy done with this track system.


I still think track system done right can not be touched with Wheelchair wheels.
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 27-01-2002, 18:04
Joe Johnson's Avatar Unsung FIRST Hero
Joe Johnson Joe Johnson is offline
Engineer at Medrobotics
AKA: Dr. Joe
FRC #0088 (TJ2)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Raynham, MA
Posts: 2,648
Joe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond repute
Wheelchair wheels are not the only legal wheels a team can have.

Traction is the thing in my mind, not tracks vs. wheels.

Joe J.
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 27-01-2002, 18:38
AdamT's Avatar
AdamT AdamT is offline
.
#0401
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: not Blacksburg, Virginia
Posts: 836
AdamT is on a distinguished road
Everything has to be wheels or treads, wheels or treads.....

So what about the other guys? Maybe there's something else out there...*wink wink*
__________________
~Adam

  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 27-01-2002, 18:48
David Kelly's Avatar
David Kelly David Kelly is offline
A Legacy of Impact
FRC #0234 (Cyber Blue)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: May 2001
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Indianapolis, IN USA
Posts: 2,579
David Kelly has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Kelly has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Kelly has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Kelly has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Kelly has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Kelly has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Kelly has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Kelly has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Kelly has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Kelly has a reputation beyond reputeDavid Kelly has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to David Kelly Send a message via Yahoo to David Kelly
i think there's a good change we may see something totally different this year. it could be us, i just can't tell. you'll have to wait and see
__________________
2010 Indiana Robotics Invitational Planning Committee


2010 Boilermaker Regional

Chairman's Award, Regional Finalist
2010 Kansas City Regional
Entrepreneurship Award

2010 Championships
Autodesk Inventor Award Winner
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 27-01-2002, 18:57
AdamT's Avatar
AdamT AdamT is offline
.
#0401
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: not Blacksburg, Virginia
Posts: 836
AdamT is on a distinguished road
Shoot, I'll go on and tell you a little right now....

That is, look for team 401!!!! Yeah, we don't have a "traditional" drive train.
__________________
~Adam

  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-01-2002, 09:04
Ben Mitchell Ben Mitchell is offline
Registered User
no team
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Bridgewater, NJ
Posts: 566
Ben Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond repute
So would 4 1/4 tracks be a waste of time?? Would 2 full-length tracks be better in terms power/effort convervation.

My idea is basically replace wheels wityh treads, gaining the traction of treads, and with less material on the ground, have less scrub and more speed (as with wheel)

I am seeking a medium between a tank and a humvee,

Am I wasting my time, or is the 1/4 half-track idea worth pursuing (or at least trying out) ??

As always, opinions on this idea are welcome.

--Ben Mitchell
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-01-2002, 20:25
Matt Attallah's Avatar
Matt Attallah Matt Attallah is offline
Now at sub 14's in a 5000lb vehicle
AKA: Maher Attallah
FRC #0005 (Robocards)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Detroit area, Michigan
Posts: 1,660
Matt Attallah has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Attallah has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Attallah has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Attallah has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Attallah has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Attallah has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Attallah has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Attallah has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Attallah has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Attallah has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Attallah has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Matt Attallah Send a message via MSN to Matt Attallah Send a message via Yahoo to Matt Attallah
Um, i think tracks would be better if...

Wouldnt' tracks be better if you are dealing with some high-forces on wheels. Where you would eather sink-in too much (than you are carying too much weight!) or wouldn't your coefficent of friction become so much that wheels won't do it? Wheels just place the weight on a point, while tracks place it over a distance. So, in my opnion (sp?) if you some how can "tilt" the goals to get more traction, i say go with tracks. They turn on a dime, and i personally like the experience with them. My team (#5) got feather weight in the finals 3 (?) at GLR, when everyone thought we broke our bar hanging-mechanisim and we didn't hahahaha , we weighed like 105 or something lbs, and we where pushing bigger, taller, very much heavier robots than us. I say go w/ tanks cuz' of my personal experience with it, and i think the motors will like it better when going straight, especially with a gear-box!!
__________________
That rug really tied the room together...
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 28-01-2002, 23:36
AdamT's Avatar
AdamT AdamT is offline
.
#0401
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: not Blacksburg, Virginia
Posts: 836
AdamT is on a distinguished road
Word of warning. Tread are very hard to engineer properly. If built wrong, very bad things can happen. Stalling, breaking curcuits. Fun stuff. Like I said before, ours aren't exactly traditional treads or tracks. We like to think, "ouside the box."
__________________
~Adam

  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-01-2002, 09:47
Matt Attallah's Avatar
Matt Attallah Matt Attallah is offline
Now at sub 14's in a 5000lb vehicle
AKA: Maher Attallah
FRC #0005 (Robocards)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Detroit area, Michigan
Posts: 1,660
Matt Attallah has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Attallah has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Attallah has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Attallah has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Attallah has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Attallah has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Attallah has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Attallah has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Attallah has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Attallah has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Attallah has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Matt Attallah Send a message via MSN to Matt Attallah Send a message via Yahoo to Matt Attallah
Yes, i agree!

Yes, 401Mentor, if you don't design the tracks correctly, you will slip the belts, eating them up and they are very, very expensive. And we did have a prob last year with our heavier robot with the treads slipping and poping breakers while turning in high gear...
__________________
That rug really tied the room together...
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-01-2002, 11:14
Ken Leung's Avatar Unsung FIRST Hero
Ken Leung Ken Leung is offline
Dare to Live!
FRC #0115 (Monta Vista Robotics Team)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: May 2001
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Palo Alto, California
Posts: 2,390
Ken Leung has a reputation beyond reputeKen Leung has a reputation beyond reputeKen Leung has a reputation beyond reputeKen Leung has a reputation beyond reputeKen Leung has a reputation beyond reputeKen Leung has a reputation beyond reputeKen Leung has a reputation beyond reputeKen Leung has a reputation beyond reputeKen Leung has a reputation beyond reputeKen Leung has a reputation beyond reputeKen Leung has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Ken Leung
Basically, with treads, you have more surface area of contact.

So what would that do to you? Well, you have more surface area to take advantage of frictional force, and you won't be pushing as hard on each square inch of carpet your robot drive on.

I don't think using treads will necessary give you more traction. I think this because I believe if you wrap the same tread material around wheels, you will get the same traction.

Say team 45's chain tread with metal pieces digging into the ground, and team 159's wheels with similar metal pieces attach all around the wheel digging into the ground. I don't think there is a lot of difference.

As for being pushed on the side, you do have more side area on your treads to resist against the push, but the resistance should be the same with wheels with similar material wrap around them. With the same pushing force from another robot, that pushing force will spread through out the tread, or concentrate on the 4 wheels. Tread have more surface area to resist, but less force per surface area... Wheels have fewer surfaces to resist, but more force per surface area... They should both come out to be the same...

So, do treads give out a false sense of more traction, because in general the material for treads has better coefficient of friction than normal wheels?

Or, is there some special physics behind treads that help it gain traction over wheels with the same material wrap around it?


By the way, I also believe that it is more important to think about traction and friction of the material you use, rather than thinking about wheels vs. treads.
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Chassis Material/Construction sanddrag Technical Discussion 51 05-12-2003 12:59
"Automatic Transmission" Madison Technical Discussion 70 24-11-2003 09:03
how does crab drive work? Soukup Technical Discussion 13 25-04-2003 11:31
pic: Drive System CD47-Bot Robot Showcase 3 27-02-2003 14:11
"Motors and Drive train edition" of Fresh From the Forum Ken Leung CD Forum Support 6 29-01-2002 12:32


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 17:51.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi