|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Personally I don't really have a preference regarding the various elim-picking flavors we've been exposed to. I just want to try and reduce ambiguity about 2002.
![]() Whatever the future holds, 2003 and beyond, please no more "Tournament Trees" like 1995-1998. Programmatically they are a nightmare! Food 4 thought: What if future drafting was done like most major sports where teams could trade their draft pick away for "cash" and "a player to be named later" or "2 picks in the second round". Wow! Now what's everyone got to say about that? Pls start a 2003 elim drafting thread and fire away! KA-108 ![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Finding myself quite confused... | Alphawolf829 | Robotics Education and Curriculum | 8 | 16-12-2002 20:19 |
| What really would have helped in finals is....... | archiver | 2001 | 4 | 24-06-2002 03:24 |
| getting picked for finals... | archiver | 2001 | 11 | 24-06-2002 02:55 |
| Are the Semis & Finals worth playing? | archiver | 2001 | 8 | 24-06-2002 00:15 |
| dead robot in the finals? | srawls | Rules/Strategy | 2 | 24-03-2002 14:44 |