|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
FIRST has been doing this for a long time. you would think they would get it right.
They have all year to set up the pairings. They know a rang of robots that will be competiting so why don't they get it right. Who knows. this happen to us for the past three year and they keep saying it is the program its the program. Well it is time for a new program! |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A New Concept for the Tournament Structure in 2004 | Andrew | Rules/Strategy | 38 | 07-07-2003 12:30 |
| Random Pairings??? | DragnButt | General Forum | 11 | 23-03-2003 11:34 |
| Ohio Final Round Pairings | Tyler 178 | Regional Competitions | 19 | 13-03-2003 22:00 |
| QUESTION - Random Alliance Pairings | archiver | 2001 | 2 | 24-06-2002 02:03 |
| Division Prediction Pool | The Lucas | Championship Event | 16 | 19-04-2002 04:06 |