Go to Post we can crank up the volume and let the world know that we are nerds with a pulse! - dlavery [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Old Forum Archives > 2001
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #27   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-06-2002, 03:44
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Well...

Posted by Kevin Sevcik at 04/19/2001 11:26 PM EST


College Student on team #57, Leopards, from BT Washington and the High School for Engineering Professions and Exxon, Kellog Brown & Root, Powell Electrical.


In Reply to: Basketball robots
Posted by Andy Baker on 04/19/2001 5:24 PM EST:



I think the point Kris was trying to make was that the tasks in basketball are relatively simple and easy to accomplish. Point, being, there wouldn't be much variety or creativity in the robots. As you just pointed out, the basketball game would break down into just 4 types of robots. All the robots would either be big and pushy or quick and agile. So you've got just 8 kinds of robots. While this year, you could have limbo bots, wedges, big ballers, off bridge balancers, on bridge balancers, bridge flippers, small ball scorers, etc.
I think the whole point here is that more complex games encourage trying different approaches to the problem. Everybody already knows how to play basketball, so there wouldn't be any robots that make you say, "Wow, I didn't think of doing that." The same goes for a simple game. Everyone will rather quickly figure out how things should be done, and creativity will play a much smaller role in the competition.
Anyways, those are my thought on this. I'm slowly reading my way up this thread, so I'll probably repeat myself a few posts above this.
__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2002 game prediction contest!!! Ken Leung Rumor Mill 41 31-12-2007 18:18
What changes to this year's game...? DougHogg General Forum 16 20-04-2003 15:35
"Rigging" the game vs playing the game strategically - what's the difference? ColleenShaver Rules/Strategy 13 15-01-2003 10:33
Ok, so YOU design the 2003 game... dlavery General Forum 157 07-01-2003 23:55


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 23:26.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi