|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: To prevent rigged matches, would you like FIRST to set tiebrakers? | |||
| Yes. |
|
23 | 44.23% |
| No. |
|
19 | 36.54% |
| I don't care. |
|
10 | 19.23% |
| Voters: 52. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
While it's quite true that it is possible to get more points by doing everything for your two teams instead of tieing with the most amount of points, it involves getting a stack of ~22 high which is HIGHLY unlikely since the boxes tend to get VERY unstable at even 8 or 10 high.
I think that earning both of your scores is a problem. Going away with your tied score (not added together) might be better since it's easier to score above that with just your one teammate. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Thanks 968 and 294 and last match LA | sanddrag | Regional Competitions | 5 | 16-04-2003 17:15 |
| How should FIRST Replay a match | Matt Reiland | Rules/Strategy | 4 | 09-03-2003 11:11 |
| Sound Levels Measured at the Nationals | archiver | 1999 | 8 | 23-06-2002 22:47 |
| Thanks - Wild Stang - What a match!!!!!! | archiver | 1999 | 1 | 23-06-2002 22:15 |
| Avg Score | CMC | General Forum | 14 | 12-03-2002 07:23 |