|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Back to the topic...
Move this kinda stuff to chit-chat or talk via PM/email/IM--it makes it really hard to have a meaningful discussion about bugs and the new editor.
Back on topic: I personally do not forsee any significant bugs in the "beta" release. Since InnovationFirst obviously was able to use it to create/test the default code, it's fairly safe to assume that it works. Personally, I'm writing my code in 2.5 syntax, even if they never release a new editor. It wouldn't be ideal, but I can always strip the text parsing engine out of RoboEmu and convert my 2.5 program to 2.0 as a last resort. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PBasic 2.5 vs. 2.0 | Anthony Kesich | Programming | 6 | 09-02-2003 22:06 |
| Broken PBASIC 2.5 Complier? | Mike Yan | Programming | 12 | 01-02-2003 09:11 |
| RoboEmu 1.09 (supports PBASIC 2.5) | rbayer | Programming | 22 | 21-01-2003 17:22 |
| PBASIC 2.5 Software supposed to be released TODAY. | Travis Hoffman | Programming | 7 | 13-01-2003 20:43 |
| PBASIC 2.5 answer from Parallax | JasonS | Programming | 6 | 07-01-2003 19:21 |