|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#2
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Several other people have reported this with the alpha version that Innovation FIRST posted.
Are you still using that one, or are you using the beta version that Parallax posted (and is now on Innovation FIRST's site)? My team has decided to use the old compiler, as we don't want to take any risks using a beta compiler. The old syntax has been good enough for as long as I've been building FIRST robots ![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PBasic 2.5 vs. 2.0 | Anthony Kesich | Programming | 6 | 09-02-2003 22:06 |
| New Stamp Editor & PBASIC 2.5 | Jnadke | Programming | 8 | 24-01-2003 07:57 |
| RoboEmu 1.09 (supports PBASIC 2.5) | rbayer | Programming | 22 | 21-01-2003 17:22 |
| PBASIC 2.5 Questions | Noah | Programming | 6 | 10-01-2003 19:26 |
| PBASIC 2.5 answer from Parallax | JasonS | Programming | 6 | 07-01-2003 19:21 |