|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
There isn't a real advance or disadvance to either 2.0 or 2.5. The difference is with the programmer, which are you more comfortable with? You technically can do the same things with each, IMHO 2.5 is easier to do most things.
To the processer is makes no difference, both 2.0 and 2.5 are tokenized into the same machine code for the processer to understand. As stated above you need the newest editor to be able to Tokenize 2.5. Other than that, you make the call as to which will do what you want it to. Help this helps! |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Broken PBASIC 2.5 Complier? | Mike Yan | Programming | 12 | 01-02-2003 09:11 |
| New Stamp Editor & PBASIC 2.5 | Jnadke | Programming | 8 | 24-01-2003 07:57 |
| RoboEmu 1.09 (supports PBASIC 2.5) | rbayer | Programming | 22 | 21-01-2003 17:22 |
| PBASIC 2.5 Questions | Noah | Programming | 6 | 10-01-2003 19:26 |
| PBASIC 2.5 answer from Parallax | JasonS | Programming | 6 | 07-01-2003 19:21 |