|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#34
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm good friends with a member of 190, and as he explained several things not just ins were not in order. they weren't truly topheavy, but their wing mechanism wasn't collapsing as designed. WPI has an excellent robot, and it's fast, however.... I do think that 3 seconds is overestimating yourselves again. Chris said about 5 seconds.
At the UTC scrimmage they took 10-12 seconds in dead reconing, and were the only bot to knock down ~70% of the stack. They were ahead of many teams even then. 871 is in about the same time range of 5 - 5.5 seconds. Great job guys, i wanna see this INS in action. and how you guys did that after or at houston. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2 fast 2 furious mocking picture :) | miketwalker | Chit-Chat | 7 | 18-06-2003 22:28 |
| need help fast!!! Hubless 1/4 pitch sprockets | Travis Covington | General Forum | 6 | 03-02-2003 18:44 |
| How fast? | archiver | 2001 | 4 | 23-06-2002 23:59 |
| The Fast and the Furious... II !! | Justin 188 | Rumor Mill | 7 | 07-06-2002 21:47 |
| How fast will your robot be? | Anton Abaya | General Forum | 18 | 20-01-2002 22:26 |