Go to Post As part of this test phase, I would expect to see Aidan sleeping on the job for most of the upcoming season. :) - dlavery [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > Regional Competitions
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-03-2003, 03:42
Amanda Morrison's Avatar Unsung FIRST Hero
Amanda Morrison Amanda Morrison is offline
16 awesome years of FRC!
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,864
Amanda Morrison has a reputation beyond reputeAmanda Morrison has a reputation beyond reputeAmanda Morrison has a reputation beyond reputeAmanda Morrison has a reputation beyond reputeAmanda Morrison has a reputation beyond reputeAmanda Morrison has a reputation beyond reputeAmanda Morrison has a reputation beyond reputeAmanda Morrison has a reputation beyond reputeAmanda Morrison has a reputation beyond reputeAmanda Morrison has a reputation beyond reputeAmanda Morrison has a reputation beyond repute
Post St. Louis - A Definite Practice in the Ideals of FIRST

To be honest, our first regional as a team went..well, not as planned, but not necessarily bad. We toughed it out, like rookies should have to, and we had our ups and downs. But this regional was like none other that I had attended. This regional was a learning experience for me on engineering practices, teamwork, and upholding the meaning of FIRST. This regional was, most definately, a lesson on both what FIRST should and should not be.

What FIRST probably shouldn't be:
During the practice matches on Thursday, we had no drive train at all. Our second model was still in the works, but not having a full field back home, we decided to place the robot on the top of the ramp and see how well our traction held. We told our fellow teams about this and ran up to place the robot. The first time, it held well.

The second time, we placed the robot on top of the ramp, and three different rookie teams loudly expressed anger and 'booed' our team off the field. Our team's feelings were hurt by this more than any other act. Parents of rookie teams were standing in the bleachers and 'booing' our robot and our test. Many of our team members were embarassed, hurt, and most of all, disappointed. I never thought I would see the day that a group of parents would jeer another team's robot. Personally, I couldn't believe my ears. How do you say "Don't worry about it" to a group of kids who were just literally just degraded? As a mentor, I felt helpless.

Another time, a team came up to us and our alliance partner and tried to strike a 'deal' for getting each team more qualifying points. Our driver was approached and was asked to participate in a match where all human players would lay out four stacks of four, all bins would try to be even between the different alliances, and the robots would all make each other room on the ramp at the end. This was a quick scheme to cheat the competitive system and gain each team a higher standing. Ourselves and our alliance partner declined and received a rude answer.

The only thing I could think during this entire scenario was, What Would Dean Do? He would do what was right for the entire alliance and decline this offer. He would do what was in the best interest of both the competition and gracious professionalism. Most of all, he would stand for the ideals of FIRST and the FIRST community. I think we made the right choice.

What FIRST should be:
The St. Louis regional was not only a lesson in life, but a tough one. After our team build seven different drive trains, starting on Thursday morning and ending on Saturday afternoon, we had nothing but gratitude for the teams that helped us continually. Team 45's bot was torn apart into pieces when I came to ask Andy Baker for some help with our drive train. He immediately followed me to our pit, kneeled down and inspected the problem, and said, "How can I help?" This single act of gracious professionalism was incredible. Andy got us back on the right track, and we never passed him in the pits without a 'Good luck!' or 'If you need any help, call me." His unselfishness was greatly appreciated by us, just a mere little rookie team with no mentors, no money, and no drive train.

Team 447's bot released some 'magic smoke' during some of their matches early on Friday. And yet, their engineers, knowing that we had no help, came over with a toolbox and some good ideas. They walked us through several of our drive trains, and were always there with an extra hand and some good words of encouragement. It meant a lot to our team, which by this point were more than just a little discouraged. When we finally got running on Saturday morning, they were cheering right with us. They never gave up on us, even when we were frustrated and tired of this whole drives mess.

Every time we needed a part, whether it be a flashlight, some rubber, or good old Duct Tape, teams 906, 476, 447, 1018, 45, and 1028 were right there with us. They checked up on us regularly and never let us give up for a moment. There was nothing more inspiring than those teams giving you a pat on the back and a couple inspiring words before a match. Their unselfish acts gave a team with a broken robot a true FIRST spirit.

These are personally acts that happened to our team. I am sure that other teams might have experienced the same. Our team was not the only robot that was down and out, but we did receive just enough engineering help to both fix the robot and give our kids some pride in their hard work. Many teams sacrificed to make this regional a better one for us, without so much as asking for a 'thanks'.

It is these teams that uphold the real meaning of FIRST, as Dean Kamen intended it to be.
__________________
Director of Operations, VEX Robotics, Inc.
Alumna - Teams 71, 1020, 1720, 148
2002 World Champions (Team 71) | 2008 World Champions (Team 148)
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-03-2003, 06:29
DougHogg DougHogg is offline
Robot-A-Holic
FRC #0980 (The ThunderBots)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: S. California
Posts: 324
DougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud of
Re: St. Louis - A Definite Practice in the Ideals of FIRST

Quote:
Originally posted by amandabean
This regional was, most definately, a lesson on both what FIRST should and should not be.
Well done to your team for persisting and also for not allowing those people who were jeering to bring your team down to their level.

I guess there should be some printed material on the philosophy of FIRST, written in simple english, to hand out to new FIRST participants each year with a place on the bottom for them to sign that they pledge to uphold the values of FIRST. Also I think that we should hand all spectators a pamphlet with the FIRST philosophy and some rules of behavior as they arrive at competitions.

As to teams seeking to inflate their scores by working out deals with their opponents, maybe the above would help, but I think it is also time to do away with a system of scoring that would reward such behavior with high scores. As Dean says, a society gets what it celebrates. It is time to do away with a scoring system which rewards the winner for giving the looser points during a match. It doesn't occur in sports in this country, and it certainly doesn't occur in industry. It is also causing oddities in the elimination rounds if both teams win a match. As an example, here are some scores from the St. Louis Semi Finals. Based on the scores, who do you think should advance from this semi-final round, blue or red?

Alliance Team SCORE

__Elim SF2.1
_ _Blue 525 _ 71 Cedar Falls HS
_ _Blue 16 71 Baxter & Mt. Home HS
_ _Red _ 877 _ 10 NASA/Cub Robotics
_ _Red _ 1178 10 Ursuline/DeSmet
_
__Elim SF2.2
_ _Blue 525 _ 30 Cedar Falls HS
_ _Blue _ 16 30 Baxter & Mt. Home HS
_ _Red _ 877 64 NASA/Cub Robotics
_ _Red _ 1178 64 Ursuline/DeSmet

Here is how it looks with Qualifying Points:

Alliance Team SCORE QP

__Elim SF2.1
_ _Blue 525 71 91 Cedar Falls HS
_ _Blue 16 71 91 Baxter & Mt. Home HS
_ _Red _ 877 10 10 NASA/Cub Robotics
_ _Red 1178 10 10 Ursuline/DeSmet
_
__Elim SF2.2
_ _Blue 525 30 30 Cedar Falls HS
_ _Blue 16 30 30 Baxter & Mt. Home HS
_ _Red 877 64 124 NASA/Cub Robotics
_ _Red 1178 64 124 Ursuline/DeSmet

The red team advanced. That is contrary to the way life works. I do understand that we don't want experienced teams to demolish the rookies and demoralize them, but the current system is akin to letting your child win at Monopoly so he won't cry. I say let's get real. We should find other ways to help rookies do better. This year's kit of parts was excellent in that regard.

Speaking of a society getting what it celebrates, we need to celebrate the teams who helped out other teams in the pits. They need to be honored for representing the best of FIRST, especially those teams who were having their own problems like Team 45. Congratulations on showing what gracious professionalism is all about.
__________________
FIRST Team 980, The ThunderBots
2002: S. California Rookie All Stars
2004: S. California: Regional Champion,
Championship Event: Galileo 2nd seed,
IRI: Competition Winner, Cal Games: Competition Winner
2005: Arizona: 1st seed
Silicon Valley: Regional Champion (Thanks Teams 254 and 22)
S. California: Regional Runners Up (Thanks Teams 22 and 968)
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-03-2003, 11:00
Brandon Martus's Avatar Unsung FIRST Hero
Brandon Martus Brandon Martus is offline
busy.
AKA: B. Slash Kamen
no team
 
Join Date: May 2001
Rookie Year: 1998
Location: Nevada, TX USA
Posts: 5,271
Brandon Martus has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon Martus has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon Martus has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon Martus has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon Martus has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon Martus has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon Martus has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon Martus has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon Martus has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon Martus has a reputation beyond reputeBrandon Martus has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via ICQ to Brandon Martus Send a message via AIM to Brandon Martus Send a message via Yahoo to Brandon Martus
Re: Re: St. Louis - A Definite Practice in the Ideals of FIRST

Quote:
Originally posted by DougHogg
I guess there should be some printed material on the philosophy of FIRST, written in simple english, to hand out to new FIRST participants each year with a place on the bottom for them to sign that they pledge to uphold the values of FIRST.
Check out this from Redhead Jokes' signature. Thats all I could think of when I read your post.
__________________
Brandon Martus
e-mail
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-03-2003, 12:08
Richard Wallace's Avatar
Richard Wallace Richard Wallace is offline
I live for the details.
FRC #3620 (Average Joes)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Southwestern Michigan
Posts: 3,680
Richard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond repute
This is a good thread. Thanks, Amanda.

Two things I'd like to add:

1) The Prank Monkeys, Team 1020, exhibited both gracious professionalism and grace under pressure at the St. Louis regional. They had an ambitious strategy for a rookie team, and struggled mightily to make it work. And while this was happening several of them spent time helping other teams, and one even volunteered with the FIRST crew (thanks, Neil!)

2) I strongly disagree with the suggestion that FIRST should change its scoring philosophy. The component of QP/EP score based on the opponents' raw point total is what gives the game most of its variety and challenge. If each alliance got points based only on its own score, the game would be too easy. In the St Louis SF2 example that DougHogg cited above, Red advanced and that is as it should be -- all teams knew the scoring rules beforehand, and should have planned and played accordingly. That is how life works.
__________________
Richard Wallace

Mentor since 2011 for FRC 3620 Average Joes (St. Joseph, Michigan)
Mentor 2002-10 for FRC 931 Perpetual Chaos (St. Louis, Missouri)
since 2003

I believe in intuition and inspiration. Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited, whereas imagination embraces the entire world, stimulating progress, giving birth to evolution. It is, strictly speaking, a real factor in scientific research.
(Cosmic Religion : With Other Opinions and Aphorisms (1931) by Albert Einstein, p. 97)
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-03-2003, 12:11
Joel Glidden's Avatar
Joel Glidden Joel Glidden is offline
My heart pumps diesel.
FRC #4293 (Komodo)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Highlands Ranch, CO
Posts: 208
Joel Glidden is a glorious beacon of lightJoel Glidden is a glorious beacon of lightJoel Glidden is a glorious beacon of lightJoel Glidden is a glorious beacon of lightJoel Glidden is a glorious beacon of lightJoel Glidden is a glorious beacon of light
I just want to point out that the info FIRST has on the St. Louis elims is incorrect. The blue alliance in SF2.2 was 525 and 356. And if we'd just driven off the ramp, we'd have advanced. I agree that +2(Losers score) can make some odd things happen. But it was our bad call that cost us the semi-finals, not the scoring rules. The plan all along was to lose big if we were going to lose. We just goofed in the last half second of the match.

-Joel
__________________
-Joel
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-03-2003, 13:09
Ben Mitchell Ben Mitchell is offline
Registered User
no team
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Bridgewater, NJ
Posts: 566
Ben Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond repute
Now, my question is:

Where were the FIRST staff and the referees while team 1020 was being booed? Why weren't these parents and students shown the door?

I think FIRST needs to get it's act together, stop preaching, and start ENFORCING these codes of conduct. It makes me vey sad to see teams doing that sort of thing without fear of punishment. They should have been penalized: I think a ban from attending the nationals ought to do it.
__________________
Benjamin Mitchell

Vex Robotics Competition team advisor (4 high school teams)

Last edited by Ben Mitchell : 09-03-2003 at 13:16.
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-03-2003, 13:53
DougHogg DougHogg is offline
Robot-A-Holic
FRC #0980 (The ThunderBots)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: S. California
Posts: 324
DougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally posted by Joel Glidden
I just want to point out that the info FIRST has on the St. Louis elims is incorrect. The blue alliance in SF2.2 was 525 and 356. And if we'd just driven off the ramp, we'd have advanced. I agree that +2(Losers score) can make some odd things happen. But it was our bad call that cost us the semi-finals, not the scoring rules. The plan all along was to lose big if we were going to lose. We just goofed in the last half second of the match.

-Joel
Thanks for clarifying what happened.

Actually that kind of sums up my objection to the existing scoring rules. Here we had a situation where a team had to purposefully "lose big if we were going to lose."

Question: What does the audience think when they see a robot deliberately drive off the ramp to lower their score? Are they going to understand that? Doubt it.

Question2: Where in life do we find a team winning by doing worse in a competition?

Quote:
Originally posted by Richard

2) I strongly disagree with the suggestion that FIRST should change its scoring philosophy. The component of QP/EP score based on the opponents' raw point total is what gives the game most of its variety and challenge. If each alliance got points based only on its own score, the game would be too easy. In the St Louis SF2 example that DougHogg cited above, Red advanced and that is as it should be -- all teams knew the scoring rules beforehand, and should have planned and played accordingly. That is how life works.
I get your point on that. I think you are right when you say the scoring adds variety and challenge. Maybe there is another way to achieve that without a team having to deliberately reduce their own score to win (thus confusing anyone watching on the NASA channel among other problems). For example, maybe a team's final score could be linked to how well both robots on their team do? Anyway, I guess it is time for me to put my money where my mouth is and design a game, per FIRST's challenge.

Quote:
Originally posted by Brandon Martus
Check out this from Redhead Jokes' signature. Thats all I could think of when I read your post.
Very cool! I hadn't seen Team 294's Gracious Professionalism Poster before. Good job, Team 294. See you in Phoenix!
__________________
FIRST Team 980, The ThunderBots
2002: S. California Rookie All Stars
2004: S. California: Regional Champion,
Championship Event: Galileo 2nd seed,
IRI: Competition Winner, Cal Games: Competition Winner
2005: Arizona: 1st seed
Silicon Valley: Regional Champion (Thanks Teams 254 and 22)
S. California: Regional Runners Up (Thanks Teams 22 and 968)
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-03-2003, 14:23
Richard Wallace's Avatar
Richard Wallace Richard Wallace is offline
I live for the details.
FRC #3620 (Average Joes)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Southwestern Michigan
Posts: 3,680
Richard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond repute
I like the idea of a scoring objective that can only be achieved by having both robots in an alliance contribute -- this would improve the game in two ways that come to mind immediately:

1) it would remove one element of pure luck in qualifying alliance draws, making it unlikely that a less capable team could get a high QP rank simply by drawing a succession of strong partners, and

2) it could provide an alternative element of challenge and variety, so that the scorched-earth strategy that many people have found so distasteful at regionals this weekend could be eliminated.

Maybe I'll try my hand at a new game design, too.
__________________
Richard Wallace

Mentor since 2011 for FRC 3620 Average Joes (St. Joseph, Michigan)
Mentor 2002-10 for FRC 931 Perpetual Chaos (St. Louis, Missouri)
since 2003

I believe in intuition and inspiration. Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited, whereas imagination embraces the entire world, stimulating progress, giving birth to evolution. It is, strictly speaking, a real factor in scientific research.
(Cosmic Religion : With Other Opinions and Aphorisms (1931) by Albert Einstein, p. 97)
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-03-2003, 14:48
Will Will is offline
Registered User
#0476 (Adidar)
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ponca City, OK
Posts: 1
Will is an unknown quantity at this point
Smile See you next time

I was one of the event volunteers and was standing right in front of the team that booed you. Believe me, I was totally shocked at their actions. A few of them continued even after I turned around and gave them dirty looks (twice). But I will say this, one or two of the people on their team looked embarrassed to be associated with them and I don’t recall seeing any mentors in the group. Hopefully, they will get their act together in the future. The way I see it, FIRST is not about the poor sportsmanship that these kids exhibited.

Even though I was with a veteran team, I am a rookie mentor and this was my first year. What I learned at this year's event is that there is a LOT MORE to the “competition” than the final standings. Our team was really impressed with the incredible courage shown by the PrankMonkeys. Your team has a lot to be proud of; I thought your robot design was good (almost great) and your outfits were absolutely fantastic! I especially liked the monkey faces Your contributions to the event and your presents did not go unnoticed.

Hope to see you again.

Will Adams, Engineering Mentor
2003 St. Louis Regional Score Keeper
Adidars, Team 476
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-03-2003, 18:36
Thunder360 Thunder360 is offline
Registered User
#0940 (Digital Demolition)
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Brookings SD
Posts: 48
Thunder360 is on a distinguished road
I found it really dumb when our team (940) got yelled at because one of our team members and one of team 939's team members didnt have protective glass's on. And the lady that yelled at us didnt have protective glass's on herself. Is'nt that a double standard when your getting yelled at by a person who has been doing the same mistake? I guess saftey doesnt apply to FIRST's staff members
__________________
"Who needs Battle Bots, Ive got US FIRST!!!"
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-03-2003, 18:57
Ben Mitchell Ben Mitchell is offline
Registered User
no team
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Bridgewater, NJ
Posts: 566
Ben Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond reputeBen Mitchell has a reputation beyond repute
Well, you DO need to have safety glasses on as stated in the rules. The rulebook every team receives does not mention FIRST staffers needed to wear safety glasses.
__________________
Benjamin Mitchell

Vex Robotics Competition team advisor (4 high school teams)
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-03-2003, 19:18
PhatalEphekt PhatalEphekt is offline
Registered User
#0935 (RaileRobotics)
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Newton, KS
Posts: 27
PhatalEphekt is on a distinguished road
I would also like to commend the PrankMonekys on their awesome job of handling pressure during the 3 days of comp. I helped their programmer, sorry didn't get his name, work on their autonmous, and it was a blast. They did so well with what they had.

GOOD JOB GUYS

Scott
Guy with 8 million buttons on his hat
Team 935
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-03-2003, 21:08
MikeFromTeam71's Avatar
MikeFromTeam71 MikeFromTeam71 is offline
Registered User
#0071 (Team Hammond)
Team Role: Operator
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Hammond
Posts: 222
MikeFromTeam71 is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via AIM to MikeFromTeam71
well amanda, this is the first im hearing of the results of the st.louis regional. first off, good job. i knew you could make a team happen. congratulations to all of the prankmonkeys for just getting everything together to make a team, let alone compete.

i am glad to hear that all of the other teams, rookie or not, were willing to help you. 906, 476, 447, 1018, 45, and 1028, thank you for exhibiting what f.i.r.s.t is all about.

now, on to the unsportsmanlike conduct during the matches. first off, in the spirit of the game, why would you EVER want to strike a deal with the other teams to inflate your individual score? to me, this defeats the purpose of even competing. this isnt what f.i.r.s.t is all about and everybody knows it. when teams get to the point where they are trying to make deals with other teams to inflate each teams individual score, then f.i.r.s.t competition has hit a low point.

as for the team or teams that were 'booing' you guys, forget them. personally, i believe that they should be exposed and used as an example for everybody else. they should be sacrificed on the alter of gracious professionalism, if you will. some might not feel the way that i do, maybe thats because i know members that are part of the prankmonkeys, but in any case i believe that the team or teams involved should apologize for their behavior. i would feel the same way i do now no matter what team was involved. i have never heard a team truly get 'booed' at, so these actions by other teams suprises me.

on a lighter note, congratulations to the prankmonkeysfor their showing at the st.louis regional!!
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-03-2003, 22:50
Norm M.'s Avatar
Norm M. Norm M. is offline
Registered User
#0525
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Cedar Falls, Iowa
Posts: 32
Norm M. will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally posted by MikeFromTeam71
now, on to the unsportsmanlike conduct during the matches. first off, in the spirit of the game, why would you EVER want to strike a deal with the other teams to inflate your individual score? to me, this defeats the purpose of even competing. this isnt what f.i.r.s.t is all about and everybody knows it. when teams get to the point where they are trying to make deals with other teams to inflate each teams individual score, then f.i.r.s.t competition has hit a low point.

I have to disagree with this. The game is presented as a set of rules. It is up to the teams to figure out how to play the game. What is wrong, especially in the spirit of gracious professionalism, to work out a plan such that the losing alliance gets 100 qualifying points while the winning alliance gets over 300? If FIRST didn't want this to happen, the qualifying points would look something like the number of points scored by the winning alliance.

We saw examples of teams pushing boxes onto the opposing alliances side to boost up their score. How is this any different than making an agreement up front to not zero out each other's stacks? Was it unsportsmanlike to leave scoring points on the opposing teams side? Did the spirit of FIRST command us to knock down the stacks on the other side when their robots couldn't cross the ramp?

Goofy scoring systems are a part of the FIRST competition. If you want it to be a competition, then teams are going to have different strategies for maximizing their scores. Unsportsman like? I don't see it that way. If FIRST wanted the scoring to be Alliance RED against Alliance Blue, with no cooperation, they would set the qualifying points to be only their alliance points, with no adders for the opposing alliance. If they wanted it to be ruthless, they would award you the difference in scores.

The set of rules encourages cooperation, even between opposing alliances.
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-03-2003, 03:12
DougHogg DougHogg is offline
Robot-A-Holic
FRC #0980 (The ThunderBots)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: S. California
Posts: 324
DougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud ofDougHogg has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally posted by Norm M.
I have to disagree with this. The game is presented as a set of rules. It is up to the teams to figure out how to play the game. What is wrong, especially in the spirit of gracious professionalism, to work out a plan such that the losing alliance gets 100 qualifying points while the winning alliance gets over 300? If FIRST didn't want this to happen, the qualifying points would look something like the number of points scored by the winning alliance.

We saw examples of teams pushing boxes onto the opposing alliances side to boost up their score. How is this any different than making an agreement up front to not zero out each other's stacks? Was it unsportsmanlike to leave scoring points on the opposing teams side? Did the spirit of FIRST command us to knock down the stacks on the other side when their robots couldn't cross the ramp?

Goofy scoring systems are a part of the FIRST competition. If you want it to be a competition, then teams are going to have different strategies for maximizing their scores. Unsportsman like? I don't see it that way. If FIRST wanted the scoring to be Alliance RED against Alliance Blue, with no cooperation, they would set the qualifying points to be only their alliance points, with no adders for the opposing alliance. If they wanted it to be ruthless, they would award you the difference in scores.

The set of rules encourages cooperation, even between opposing alliances.
I get what you are saying. That is why we have to get the rules changed for next year. It is supposed to be a competition, not play acting. What if all 4 teams from every match got together and decided on what everyone should do so that they all get the highest possible points. That wouldn't be a competition, it would be a play, with 4 actors in every match. So it is time to alter the rules, so that collaboration between opponents is not a temptation. We just have to arrange the rules so they don't reward such actions.

What do they call it when 2 boxers get together to decide how the match will be run. They call it "fixing the fight".

Let's not get into fixing our FIRST matches. After all, the spectators think that they are watching a competition. Some of the matches are on TV. Let's not fake it. We just need to come up with some new scoring patterns that will result in interesting matches without tempting people to fix the match.

As to how people should behave given the current scoring, every team should strategize with their partners on how to optimize the score, but not get into making deals with their opponents. After all, how would you feel if the New York Yankees starting working out deals with other teams for everyone to get lots of home runs to make the crowd happy or something. That would be fake. Let's not go that way. We want an honest competition. It's a GAME. There needs to be opponents. Otherwise we are all wasting our time. NO OPPONENTS = NO GAME = WASTE OF TIME.
__________________
FIRST Team 980, The ThunderBots
2002: S. California Rookie All Stars
2004: S. California: Regional Champion,
Championship Event: Galileo 2nd seed,
IRI: Competition Winner, Cal Games: Competition Winner
2005: Arizona: 1st seed
Silicon Valley: Regional Champion (Thanks Teams 254 and 22)
S. California: Regional Runners Up (Thanks Teams 22 and 968)
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
St Louis Notes Andy Baker Regional Competitions 62 17-03-2003 09:25
St. Louis Regional 'Giveaways' Amanda Morrison Regional Competitions 23 10-03-2003 03:04
St. Louis Regional Event Al Skierkiewicz Thanks and/or Congrats 0 09-03-2003 23:49
St. Louis Regional Lance Regional Competitions 4 09-04-2002 18:16


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:04.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi