Go to Post what would we do without brandon? - Arefin Bari [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-03-2003, 00:08
BaysianLogik's Avatar
BaysianLogik BaysianLogik is offline
Mentor Emeritus
AKA: Matthew Bays
FRC #1523 (M.A.R.S.)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Jupiter, FL
Posts: 23
BaysianLogik is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to BaysianLogik
Quote:
Originally posted by Rook
The reason this strategy is against the spirit of FIRST is. If you have a bot that fights its way all the way through the qualifying matches, but doesn't make it because another team has fixed its way into the finals. That just blows.

You can't just look at it as fixing a single match. You are fixing the entire competition and your actions affect the placement of all the other teams.
Slight problem with this reasoning. If you have robots that are not competitive by any stretch of the imagination, which i noticed at least 25% of the robots at annapolis fit this description, the teams against these robots as well as the bad robots themselves, automatically got higher scores, because these robots COULDN'T destroy the stacks. so even robots that are not necessarilly the best would get high scores by loosing. Higher scores, in fact, than some of the matches where 4 very competitive robots were together. Although this was a problem in previous years, never to this extent, because most of the other games one team got the points, the points didn't just dissappear into thin air.

The highest QP score at annapolis was when two mediocre robots, both of which didn't make it past the quarterfinals, went against two robots that virtually stayed in their starting positions.
One of the lowest scoring matches i saw was when 3 of what i thought were the top 4 robots at the competition were against each other, and duked it out until virtually nothing was in either zone.

In this game, even if no agreements are made, the stacks are going to survive in some rounds because of the competitiors. So if i were to choose between agreements, which put the poor robots at the bottom rankings, and the better ones at the top, and one where poor robots got higher scores by totally loosing, and the competitive robots got low scores by fighting till the bitter end, i would choose the agreements.
__________________
Mentor Emeritus-Team 1523: Jupiter HS/GE
Former Mentor-Team 639: Ithaca HS/Borg Warner
Alumni-Team 179: Suncoast HS/UTC

Last edited by BaysianLogik : 17-03-2003 at 00:15.
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cedar Point Dates, Round 1 Jeff Waegelin General Forum 0 27-04-2003 20:57
Video of 510 point round... archiver 2001 3 24-06-2002 01:57
FIRST @ The Point...Who's Going? archiver 2000 0 23-06-2002 23:24
Cedar Point Anyone? archiver 2000 9 23-06-2002 23:21
point of lower deck? Jay5780 General Forum 7 11-01-2002 21:21


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:54.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi