Go to Post It's like FIRST saying "Well it was too hard, so we give up. Lets give the kids something easier to do." How is that supposed to inspire kids? - Mike [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-03-2003, 18:57
srawls's Avatar
srawls srawls is offline
Registered User
#0122 (Nasa Knights)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Yorktown
Posts: 507
srawls is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via AIM to srawls
Re: Is FIRST Encouraging Uncompetitive Winners?

Quote:
Originally posted by Tony
I do not blame the teams that are taking the "win one, shamelessly lose the next one" route. They read the rules, they understand them, and they want to win. We all want to win. It is FIRST's fault for blatantly leaving this option wide open to the teams: To try to win decisively or to win the backhanded way.
Ok, let's assume lowering your score in the eliminations is winning in a backhand way. Teams which engage in this "ungrasious and unproffesional backhand" strategy are at no fault of their own, rather it is FIRST's fault, because they leave the possibility of it helping teams? I find this difficult to believe. It is the responsibility of all teams to practice gracious proffesionalism, and to follow the spirit of the rules, it is not FIRST's responsibility to make it impossible for teams to act ungracious and unproffesional.

That said, I do agree in that I prefer the best two out of three to the current situation. I feel a bit ambivalent about this, however, as I also opposed the elimination rounds last year, where teams could capture three goals and sit (I saw that as boring). Thus, I wanted qps to play a higher role in elimination rounds. Many people felt this way, and that is why FIRST changed the game the way they did. Now, I agree the elimination matches this year should be changed next year. People who agree can tell FIRST in the FIRST Forums politely. But, seeing how FIRST made this rule because they were listening to us in the first place, please don't say FIRST is making a mockery of the game.

Interstingly enough, most people I've talked to thought the 2001 coopertition game boring to watch for the qualifying rounds. I did too. But I personally thought that was very exciting to watch in the elimination rounds. It is a challenge to come up with a game exciting to watch for both the qualifying rounds and the elimination rounds, but I trust FIRST will try their best (and they even illicited game design ideas from all teams).

Stephen
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Regional & Division winners, did you shift gears or not? DougHogg Technical Discussion 34 02-05-2003 16:10
Regional Chairman's Winners starshrike Chairman's Award 23 07-04-2003 12:39
Do you know Saturday's award winners from UTC? archiver 2001 0 24-06-2002 02:07
Award winners forgotten? JHBurch Championship Event 20 02-05-2002 11:47
week 1 winners cam-man Chairman's Award 5 15-03-2002 01:48


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:18.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi