|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Galileo Division: What is your team position on collusion? | |||
| We support it, we plan to do it |
|
3 | 6.12% |
| We support it, but do not plan to do it |
|
0 | 0% |
| We do not support it, and do not plan to do it |
|
45 | 91.84% |
| We do not support it, but might do it anyway |
|
1 | 2.04% |
| Voters: 49. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#3
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Aidan, good points. Team 45 Agrees.
We will play to win, not collude. However, if our opponents wish to leave our stack alone, that would be swell. Heck, they're welcome to even join us on the ramp! Maybe I'm a bit naive, but I don't think that collusion will happen at the Championships. We've all learned alot since the first and second weeks of the regionals, when the majority of this was happening. Andy B. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Galileo teams | Andy Baker | Championship Event | 34 | 06-04-2003 20:52 |
| Hits, Misses, & Suggestions -- long message | archiver | 2000 | 17 | 23-06-2002 23:36 |
| The Case For 'Regionalizing' teams at the Nationals. | archiver | 2000 | 33 | 23-06-2002 23:35 |
| How do we view more teams? | archiver | 2000 | 0 | 23-06-2002 23:11 |
| Multiple Regionals | archiver | 1999 | 55 | 23-06-2002 22:26 |