|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Did you use the Beta Stamp Editor? With what results? | |||
| We didn't use the Beta editor. |
|
2 | 10.53% |
| We used it with no problems. |
|
15 | 78.95% |
| We tried it, but had problems, so abandoned it. |
|
0 | 0% |
| We had problems, but found work-arounds. |
|
1 | 5.26% |
| We had problems, and Parallax provided us a private release. |
|
0 | 0% |
| We had other non-tokenizer-related problems. |
|
1 | 5.26% |
Other. (I'm not sure what other possibilities there are, but someone is sure to want an Other option )
|
|
0 | 0% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 19. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
yeah, we'd have to learn a new language, but anything is better than PBASIC. i don't see why we can't have the option to use the Java chip, or some sort of C/C++ chip. if there was a way to swap out "modules" or switch a jumper to use a different chip, it'd make so much more sense, while allowing us to slowly move away from PBASIC, which, well, has shown this year, and is bound to show even more next year, how underpowered it is for true autonomous applications. but back to the topic at hand... |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Auxilliary Basic Stamp Chip | Kai Zhao | Technical Discussion | 9 | 07-01-2003 21:21 |
| no basic stamp found! | DLyons | Programming | 7 | 23-12-2002 22:17 |
| I Need Help with downloading Basic Stamp Program | archiver | 1999 | 2 | 23-06-2002 21:57 |
| Is anyone using the BASIC Stamp Preprocessor? | Greg Ross | Programming | 4 | 12-02-2002 12:24 |
| Question about Basic Stamp | miketwalker | Programming | 3 | 14-01-2002 13:10 |