|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
i will agree with the above reply, except that if you were a 4th year team, they may judge whether or not you COULD have gone (obviously you could have due to the even/odd system of years past). my question is, what about the even numbered rookie teams from last year? we never even got a "free" chance to goto nat's...
or maybe the system just doesn't make sense to me? i'm really glad that they implemented something like this...i went to nat's with 442 two years ago and it was packed! i hope this thins things out a bit! ![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Using an Operator Interface with the 2004 EDU RC wirelessly | Dave Flowerday | Robotics Education and Curriculum | 34 | 19-04-2004 19:06 |
| Championship Qualification - Constructive Criticism | Andy Baker | Championship Event | 7 | 29-10-2003 16:48 |
| 2004 Championship Qualification? | Andy Baker | Championship Event | 9 | 19-09-2003 12:26 |
| Championship Eligibility Criteria | Joe Lambie | Rumor Mill | 2 | 26-08-2003 22:25 |
| QotW 6-01-03: The Championship | Madison | Rumor Mill | 13 | 02-06-2003 06:06 |