|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think play hard, do your best, don't get fancy or tricky and be
a gracious proffesional is the way to go. I think in one Lonestar match GRT 192 lost a match because they scored 10 points for their opponent with the tether! not clear if this was intentional or not. (I saw this on the internet so I might be mistaken) Anyway I think trying to be too fancy in general is not good, but showing off all your special capabilities is probably O.K. It looks like the ball handlers qualify and do really well !6, 47 --- (lead seeds) ----but ----- the finals come down to a scrum in the middle and being able to score 20 balls don't mean a thing if there is no goal to put them in. It is too easy to disrupt most ball handlers (you just get in their way) So If a ball handler qualifyies, they best get some goal control partners. and If a goal contoller qualifyies they do a vice a versa. This is the stategy 255 used for the 2000 Nats. Strength through diversity. Well - I like to run off at the mouth. We'll all see if I am blowing hot air when the San Jose regionals are completed. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| More teams in the elimination rounds | DougHogg | General Forum | 16 | 27-04-2003 16:11 |
| Is FIRST Encouraging Uncompetitive Winners? | Tony | General Forum | 35 | 27-03-2003 19:09 |
| Rules of Engagement and "Unfair Competition" | Richard Neese | General Forum | 2 | 24-03-2003 13:03 |
| The Society for More Qualifying Rounds | archiver | 1999 | 47 | 23-06-2002 22:05 |
| "Regional Competition Edition" of Fresh From the Forum | Ken Leung | CD Forum Support | 5 | 21-03-2002 08:21 |