|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#44
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Three-team alliances?
Posted by Andrew Trax, Coach on team #180, S.P.A.M., from Southfork,Martin Co. High and UTC.
Posted on 5/4/99 3:44 AM MST In Reply to: Three-team alliances? posted by Eric on 5/3/99 11:19 PM MST: Unless there were some rule mandating a minimum number of games played rather than just on the bench, like Little League, some teams would spend very little, if any, time on the field. Imagine being on a team with a not so great robot and watching rather than playing. That would be heartbreaking. I'd rather lose than not try. But there's no saying what will happen in the future. They may come up with a game that puts three or more on a alliance AND on the field. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| BUCKEYE Alliances | soap108 | Regional Competitions | 2 | 09-03-2003 12:59 |
| Prebuilt alliances? | archiver | 2001 | 3 | 23-06-2002 23:56 |
| Thank You! to our alliances from 'Aces High' Team 176 | archiver | 1999 | 0 | 23-06-2002 22:49 |
| Thanks to all the great alliances out there | lil devil | Thanks and/or Congrats | 1 | 07-05-2002 18:14 |
| Both alliances sitting in endzone with 10 seconds left? | Mike Soukup | General Forum | 7 | 24-03-2002 18:55 |