Go to Post Givens do not need solutions. - Al Skierkiewicz [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Old Forum Archives > 2000
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-06-2002, 22:13
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Clever Software is no substitute for Rigid Hardware

Posted by Joe Johnson.   [PICTURE: SAME | NEW | HELP]


Engineer on team #47, Chief Delphi, from Pontiac Central High School and Delphi Automotive Systems.

Posted on 3/2/2000 9:03 AM MST


In Reply to: Re: control system programming posted by Mike Gray on 3/2/2000 8:29 AM MST:



I think you are in for some real problems if the difference in motor speed is enough to bend your arm out of shape.

As a team that has had two motors driving 1 arm from different sides of the robot for 5 years now, I have a LOT of experience in this area.

Our standard has always been that, in such cases, the mechanism between the motors/gearboxes must be able to tolerate the motors driven in OPPOSITE directions without damage. I will admit that at times we have had machanism that didn't particularly LIKE such treatment, but never any that would suffer any permanent deflection (at least not by the time we were done with them).

This standard has served us well.

If you are having problems with the simple differences you have from the manufacturing tolerances of the motors, what are you going to do when one side of the arm catches on the goal or when some other robot loads one side of your arm or if you overload your motors and one motor's breaker trips slightly before the other?

Clever software is at best a band-aid to cover lack of rigid hardware.

I may be wiser to remove one of your motors and use the weight to stiffen up the hardware on your arm thus allowing the load to be driven from one side.

My advice, for what it is worth.

Joe J.



__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Need a FIRST Robotics control system kershawrobotics General Forum 3 07-07-2003 09:49
control system worth more than $500 archiver 2001 8 24-06-2002 02:00
New Innovation FIRST control system and the dashboard archiver 2000 0 23-06-2002 22:15
UNFAIR ADVANTAGE for CDI and new control system archiver 2000 6 23-06-2002 22:13
Ok, how much is the control system worth? archiver 2001 6 23-06-2002 22:05


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 18:12.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi