|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Was the winning alliance unbeatable?
Posted by Matt Leese at 04/09/2001 10:28 PM EST
Other on team #73, Tigerbolt, from Edison Technical HS and Alstom & Fiber Technologies & RIT. In Reply to: Was the winning alliance unbeatable? Posted by Chris on 04/09/2001 10:06 PM EST: The second place alliance could've beaten the first place alliance -- but they'd needed to be able to do what they did about 10 seconds faster. It wasn't so much machine design as it was driving practice. Beatty could double balance quickly and reliably -- that's what let them win. The design was great but the design was only part of their ability to win. Matt who was rooting for the 2nd place alliance just because he likes underdogs ![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Bash at the Beach - DIRECTIONS? | KathieK | Off-Season Events | 3 | 19-09-2003 12:45 |
| 2003 IRI live on the web!! | David Kelly | Off-Season Events | 44 | 22-07-2003 18:21 |
| Thanks to winning alliance partners | CyberWolf_22 | Thanks and/or Congrats | 2 | 07-04-2003 01:22 |
| Thanks to 507, 1077, the dream alliance | Andrew | Thanks and/or Congrats | 3 | 31-03-2003 18:46 |
| Will There Ever Be Negative Scores? | Joe Matt | General Forum | 30 | 18-01-2003 17:15 |