|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
alliances
Posted by Austin Martus, Other on team #47 from son of pchs coach.
Posted on 4/26/99 7:00 PM MST What FIRST should have done is come up with a way of in the qualifying you get points for what you've (your own team) has done instead or something like that. cause if you get *stuck*(paired) with a robot that is not very good(dont move or get on puck or anything) then youre screwed and have to do everything by you self which makes it 2 on 1 and really hard to get a lot of points and only have alliances(score for both) in the final rounds, but this would have to happen at the beginning of the year cause the building of a robot would depend on something like this or some kind of rule like this just a thought also to make the finals more accurate to have a double elimination finals but the draw back is it takes much more time |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| BUCKEYE Alliances | soap108 | Regional Competitions | 2 | 09-03-2003 12:59 |
| Prebuilt alliances? | archiver | 2001 | 3 | 23-06-2002 23:56 |
| Thank You! to our alliances from 'Aces High' Team 176 | archiver | 1999 | 0 | 23-06-2002 22:49 |
| Thanks to all the great alliances out there | lil devil | Thanks and/or Congrats | 1 | 07-05-2002 18:14 |
| Both alliances sitting in endzone with 10 seconds left? | Mike Soukup | General Forum | 7 | 24-03-2002 18:55 |