|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Weird PWM behaviour?
We've just assembled our electrical board and we're having some really really strange issues with the Jaguar.
The Jaguar (currently we only have 1 attached) is connected to the digital sidecar on PWM1. By initializing a new Jaguar via Jaguar j = new Jaguar(1); I can't control the Jaguar and it blinks yellow after enabling the robot. However, if I initialized the Jaguar using new Jaguar(4). It works flawlessly (except for the whole wrong channel number thing)... Any idea why this is? |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Which language is this and us the pwm plugged in in the right orientation
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Weird PWM behaviour?
Java, and Yes.
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Weird PWM behaviour?
There was another thread that discussed this same problem. I would search for that as I remember it was answered.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Weird PWM behaviour?
FIRST released an update a while ago that addressed the issue. Apparently, most of the KOP cables that connect the cRIO to the digital sidecar this year aren't properly wired. Here's a link to the update and to the fix:
http://frc-manual.usfirst.org/TeamUpdates/0#term%2074 Good luck and I hope this helps! |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Weird PWM behaviour?
We have been having the same issue the last few days. Using a multimeter, we did not see voltage on the PWM pins.
I did some additional research last night and found that the slot arrangements on the CRIO have changed, and may have to be accounted for when constructing the jaguar. If I remember correctly, the digital sidecar needs to go in either slots 2 or 6 this year, if it is in slot 2 your code is fine, but if it's in slot 6 you must modify to: Jaguar j = new Jaguar(2,1); //the channel must be 2 for a digital car in slot 6. (note: I'm programming in C++ and this is valid, but you may want to make sure the channel is the first param for Java) I haven't had a chance to test if this resolves our issue, but I've got a good feeling hope this can help.Last edited by DjScribbles : 19-01-2012 at 11:30. Reason: added disclaimer for java constructor |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|