Week--2 All regionals OPR

[stundt1]

All week 1 and 2 regional. Pdf and excel file attached.

Enjoy!!!

[Sean Raia]

Youre doing a great service to many of us with this, thank you.

Im a bit disheartened that i had to scroll to page 3 to find my team. Oh well, we can only keep getting better!

[stundt1]

Originally Posted by Sean Raia

Im a bit disheartened that i had to scroll to page 3 to find my team. Oh well, we can only keep getting better!

If you went to balance on the coopertition bridge your opr will be lower.

As my team went almost every match for balancing on the coopertition bridge. Our opr is low.

[dodar]

How is the OPR calculated this year?

[bearbot]

Originally Posted by dodar

How is the OPR calculated this year?

.WOW got a lot of catching up only on14 page week 2 2849
OPR 2.73027

[Tetraman]

Originally Posted by stundt1

If you went to balance on the coopertition bridge your opr will be lower.

As my team went almost every match for balancing on the coopertition bridge. Our opr is low.

wow, you're right. Thats odd, what makes it do that?

[Grim Tuesday]

Originally Posted by Tetraman

wow, you're right. Thats odd, what makes it do that?

Because OPR only measures match points scored, it doesn't take the Co-Op bridge into calculation.

[dodar]

Originally Posted by Grim Tuesday

Because OPR only measures match points scored, it doesn't take the Co-Op bridge into calculation.

So OPR is how many points you scored?

[Travis Hoffman]

Originally Posted by Grim Tuesday

Because OPR only measures match points scored, it doesn't take the Co-Op bridge into calculation.

We balanced on the coopertition bridge about 4 times in 10 matches and are ranked 10th in OPR.

Guess if you work out a successful plan with your opponents to balance it quickly near the match end, that leaves in more time for OPR-building goodness.

[Tetraman]

Originally Posted by Grim Tuesday

Because OPR only measures match points scored, it doesn't take the Co-Op bridge into calculation.

I don't think I understand. Coop bridge doesn't provide points anyway, so why would a balance on that bridge lower the number of points your robot is expected to make each match?

[Sean Raia]

Originally Posted by Tetraman

I don't think I understand. Coop bridge doesn't provide points anyway, so why would a balance on that bridge lower the number of points your robot is expected to make each match?

I believe Stundt1 is speaking of the opportunity cost of balancing those co-op bridges is not accounted for. Meaning if you spent a lot of time working on that while you could have been making baskets it doesnt take that into account.

[stundt1]

Originally Posted by Sean Raia

I believe Stundt1 is speaking of the opportunity cost of balancing those co-op bridges is not accounted for. Meaning if you spent a lot of time working on that while you could have been making baskets it doesnt take that into account.

Yes it takes to in account if you say double balanced but not coopertition balanced. Thats why its off a lot this year.

[DonRotolo]

Wow. #10, ahead of 1114.
There must be some kind of mistake.

[Travis Hoffman]

Originally Posted by DonRotolo

Wow. #10, ahead of 1114.
There must be some kind of mistake.

Clearly.

[Racer26]

I'm fairly convinced that 2056 is superior to 1114 this year.

I'm further convinced that had 188/610/3360 not dumped 3360 off the back of the bridge in both finals matches that they could have beaten 1114/2056/1219.