|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Elitist Teams
A lot of people have been discussing lately the negative remarks that are said about really good teams just because they get blue banners. But I want to explore a different side of the argument.
My team has never been a first super power, and highly doubt we will be soon. We put gracious professionalism at our forefront, instead of looking for ways to win matches, we look for ways to help rookies. So when I recently competed with a team that had an elitist "we're better than you" attitude it left a bad taste in my mouth. This team is completely unapproachable in their pits, I tried to talk strategy with them, and they denied me even though they had anything better to do. Then once we got to the cue, they showed up and I tried to to talk to them again, instead of a discussion, they told us what we were going to do the whole match as if it wasn't disputable, as if we didn't have a say. I was mad, but I figured we'll get the win and the qualification points so it's no biggie. Then once the match starts, the team has a perfect autonomous, and we're against 3 robots that really needed some help mechanically so the score was 36-0 ish in our alliances favor. We drive to our alliance bridge to prep it for balancing like this team told us to, but they apparently wants the balls on that bridge and we're in the way. instead of driving around us or asking us to move, their driver rams into us and shouts at the top of his lungs, "470 get out of the way!" as if them getting those two balls were going to win or lose the match. That's when I was ready to drop the controls and tell them what I really thought, but Gracious Professionalism prevailed. Scenarios like this have happened with many other big name teams in our area at competitions before, and I don't want this to smear the pristine FIM image, but does anyone else have these problems? Is it possible that people make the negative remarks because some teams treat others negatively? Would this team have acted the same way if Mr. Kamen was in the discussion and behind the driver station with them? |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Elitist Teams
Unfortunately I have had similar experiences. With this year's game, there is nothing more important than having everyone on the same page and communicating effectively. With those elitist teams, what I noticed being on the field with them was that the heart of the problem was not the students, but the adults around them. From what little I was able to interact with those teams' students, they were very nice and gracious people, but their mentors/coaches were less than stellar.
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Elitist Teams
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
This specifically happened to me a number of times while competing in 2010 and 2011. However, I really embraced what they were saying and the team did the best we could to help the alliance win the match. I know it's not the strategy that you planned or wanted but it should still be a $@#$@#$@#$@# good one if it's coming from the team I believe your mentioning. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Elitist Teams
Quote:
Quote:
Love before Money Gracious Professionalism before Victory! |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Elitist Teams
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Elitist Teams
Quote:
Jane |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Elitist Teams
I'm a rookie on 470 but I've been on another team before. I've experience this with the same team and have seen them do it to other teams as well. They don't deserve a second chance, they deserve to be banned from FIRST or otherwise chastised for their blatant disregard of gracious professionalism.
|
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Elitist Teams
Quote:
I suggest you re-evaluate your position, as it is thoroughly untenable. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Elitist Teams
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Elitist Teams
While the OP was pointing out a single instance involving the HOT team, we can not and should not single them out. I've been around FIRST for a while now and these types of actions are not limited to the so called "Elitist" teams. Every team is out to win, every team wants to show off what they built, and every team has their moments of weakness. I've had a past life as a drive coach, so I'm well aware of what goes on during strategy development, on field actions, and the potential fallout of when things don't go as you want. Some times you see a matchup and want the alliance to know this is what has to be done to win, some times the matchup allows for a variety of options. Every match is different and everybody's willingness to go along with the set strategy may not always be equal. Having a solid strategy may sometimes come off as "we are telling you what to do," but in reality, they are just looking out for what's best for the alliance.
For those that have claimed that HOT is solely about winning and doesn't care about anything or anyone else, hopefully you will someday change your mind. I've heard this claim before, and I've been quick to try and diffuse that notion. Over the years I have worked with and built relationships many HOT team alumni. I've never met a group of people more passionate about FIRST and all that it stands for. Whether helping get new teams off the ground or joining a struggling veteran, people that have gone through the system that HOT has developed have proven to be extremely knowledgeable and helpful in all situations. My team has unfortunately been elimated by HOT twice this year, first in the finals at Waterford, and most recently in the quarterfinals at Northville. There aren't any hard feelings, infact laughs and congratulatory words were shared by both in each instance. If nothing else, these experiences serve as an inspiration to keep improving. Last edited by Mullen : 26-03-2012 at 18:03. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Elitist Teams
Quote:
Adam's apology and responses in this thread have been amazing yet you turn around and spit this right back. Think before you post up again and actually read what he has to say. Don't just be mad and call it a day. To the OP- thanks for this discussion Adam- thanks for your extremely well thought out and worded responses, they were actually inspirational. |
|
#12
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Elitist Teams
I agree. Even though my earlier comments were critical but (hopefully) constructive, Adam took them and stated that his intention was to continuously improve... an admirable goal all around!
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Elitist Teams
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
So, a little off-topic, but something I want to address anyways: The kid said they were a rookie. Cut them some slack. Instead of publicly shaming them, send them a message that isn't so harsh and explain to them why you think their post was uncalled for. I'd hate to see someone be shunned and turned off to CD because they stuck their foot in their mouth (because then I'd be half the person I am now... the only reason I kept coming back is cause I'm stubborn). EDIT: It has been brought to my attention that they have been on another team. Although they should know better, there are better ways to show them the error in their ways. I've said some dumb things before on this forum, some that I have been severely scolded for and other that have been handled in a less harsh manner. I know which ones I had grown more from, with clear understanding where I went wrong and why I should think differently. **** HOT/Adam, very graceful replies. I hope that I one day can take criticism as gracefully as you. Last edited by Katie_UPS : 26-03-2012 at 17:14. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Elitist Teams
Quote:
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Elitist Teams
Ayup, missed that part.
None the less, five people shaming someone doesn't solve the problem. Back to the previous discussion... |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|