pic: FRC973 Testing Bridge Stability

[AdamHeard]

loading photo ...

[Tom Bottiglieri]

Where's the top part? I only ask in the name of science.

[steelerborn]

I don't think the shooter mechanism is on, 973 seemed a lot taller at CVR.

[AdamHeard]

It's on there, it's just not powdercoated.

[Nate Laverdure]

Adding bumpers probably also made a non-negligible change in your CG position.

[AdamHeard]

Originally Posted by Nate Laverdure

Adding bumpers probably also made a non-negligible change in your CG position.

It would lower our CG though.

[Nate Laverdure]

Originally Posted by AdamHeard

It would lower our CG though.

Right, just saying. It might even offset the contribution caused by "the top part" (which you just said was on there, but doesn't quite match the other picture).

[jblay]

What kind of tread do you have on your wheels?

694th post

[rcmolloy]

Originally Posted by jblay

What kind of tread do you have on your wheels?

694th post

Wedgetop tread. Not sure the actual source. Adam can back that up though.

Originally Posted by jblay

What kind of tread do you have on your wheels?

694th post

Looks like Wedgetop tread from Andymark

[jblay]

Originally Posted by SuperNerd256

Looks like Wedgetop tread from Andymark

That's what I figured it was but I just don't understand how that is possible without tread that deploys epoxy between itself and the bridge.

Originally Posted by jblay

That's what I figured it was but I just don't understand how that is possible without tread that deploys epoxy between itself and the bridge.

From what I hear, wedgetop tread has more traction on surfaces like hdpe than roughtop or blue nitrile tread. That's the main reason most top teams used it.

Also, I'm not sure if the robot has an active breaking system on it or not. That could help. 256 had software breaks that worked so well we could be at a 45 degree angle and still stay where we were without falling. Of course, these disabled when the robot was turned off.