Go to Post I actually see no issue about the sentence, but then im still in college and only half way edumacated, i am only eduma right now. - Alex Cormier [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-11-2012, 13:56
ksafin's Avatar
ksafin ksafin is offline
Registered User
AKA: Kirill Safin
FRC #3992 (Eagles Robotics Xperience)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Delray Beach, FL
Posts: 498
ksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant future
What's the verdict of on-robot cameras?

I remember seeing tons of videos from the robots perspective coming from teams who mounted a go-pro camera on their robot for every round.

What's the verdict out on this?

Is this allowed? Under what rule? Is it not recommended?

Just wanted to get a low-down so we know what the status of the situation is, as we're considering doing this.
Reply With Quote
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-11-2012, 14:01
Tytus Gerrish's Avatar
Tytus Gerrish Tytus Gerrish is offline
IGAB, ADHD, and Dislexic
AKA: Ty
FRC #0179 (SwampThing)
Team Role: Tactician
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: West Palm Beach, Florida
Posts: 2,017
Tytus Gerrish has a reputation beyond reputeTytus Gerrish has a reputation beyond reputeTytus Gerrish has a reputation beyond reputeTytus Gerrish has a reputation beyond reputeTytus Gerrish has a reputation beyond reputeTytus Gerrish has a reputation beyond reputeTytus Gerrish has a reputation beyond reputeTytus Gerrish has a reputation beyond reputeTytus Gerrish has a reputation beyond reputeTytus Gerrish has a reputation beyond reputeTytus Gerrish has a reputation beyond repute
Re: What's the verdict of on-robot cameras?

done it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6RTgHKxjS3s

as long as it doesn't transmit it's fine.
Reply With Quote
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-11-2012, 14:16
Unsung FIRST Hero
Al Skierkiewicz Al Skierkiewicz is offline
Broadcast Eng/Chief Robot Inspector
AKA: Big Al WFFA 2005
FRC #0111 (WildStang)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Wheeling, IL
Posts: 10,795
Al Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond repute
Re: What's the verdict of on-robot cameras?

Cameras can be part of the robot provided all other rules apply. Specifically but not limited to the following:
Must be weighed on the robot.
Battery must be fully contained within the camera and be isolated from the frame.
Camera must be securely fastened to the robot so as to not damage other robots, field or produce injury to volunteers or participants.
Camera cannot cause distraction to other drive teams.
Camera cannot transmit wireless without prior written approval of FIRST engineering staff.
As you can guess from the forgoing, the camera must be part of the inspection process.
__________________
Good Luck All. Learn something new, everyday!
Al
WB9UVJ
www.wildstang.org
________________________
Storming the Tower since 1996.

Last edited by Al Skierkiewicz : 03-04-2013 at 20:22.
Reply With Quote
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-11-2012, 15:06
ksafin's Avatar
ksafin ksafin is offline
Registered User
AKA: Kirill Safin
FRC #3992 (Eagles Robotics Xperience)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Delray Beach, FL
Posts: 498
ksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant future
Re: What's the verdict of on-robot cameras?

Thanks guys, that cleared a lot up!
Reply With Quote
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-11-2012, 16:00
maddoctor90's Avatar
maddoctor90 maddoctor90 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Matt
FRC #2481 (Roboteers)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Tremont
Posts: 79
maddoctor90 is a splendid one to beholdmaddoctor90 is a splendid one to beholdmaddoctor90 is a splendid one to beholdmaddoctor90 is a splendid one to beholdmaddoctor90 is a splendid one to beholdmaddoctor90 is a splendid one to beholdmaddoctor90 is a splendid one to behold
Re: What's the verdict of on-robot cameras?

Did rule R14 "No individual item shall have a value that exceeds $400.00. The total cost of Components purchased in bulk may exceed $400.00 USD as long as the cost of an individual Component does not exceed $400.00" apply to cameras this past year or is there some way of getting around it? I think most teams I saw used cameras under $400. I am just curious since the only camera we have is not under $400.

Last edited by maddoctor90 : 10-11-2012 at 16:11.
Reply With Quote
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-11-2012, 16:36
ksafin's Avatar
ksafin ksafin is offline
Registered User
AKA: Kirill Safin
FRC #3992 (Eagles Robotics Xperience)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Delray Beach, FL
Posts: 498
ksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant futureksafin has a brilliant future
Re: What's the verdict of on-robot cameras?

What cams have you guys used?

I'm between strapping on just any member-owned camera and buying an MD80 (like a $13 chinese camera that's decent).
Reply With Quote
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-11-2012, 17:28
synth3tk's Avatar
synth3tk synth3tk is offline
Volunteer / The Blue Alliance
AKA: David Thomas
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,005
synth3tk has a reputation beyond reputesynth3tk has a reputation beyond reputesynth3tk has a reputation beyond reputesynth3tk has a reputation beyond reputesynth3tk has a reputation beyond reputesynth3tk has a reputation beyond reputesynth3tk has a reputation beyond reputesynth3tk has a reputation beyond reputesynth3tk has a reputation beyond reputesynth3tk has a reputation beyond reputesynth3tk has a reputation beyond repute
Re: What's the verdict of on-robot cameras?

I would be careful strapping on a camera worth more than $400 onto these robots if it's the only one you own. While the rules prohibit damaging another's robot, things do happen sometimes. I've seen plenty of broken pieces during my field reset days.
__________________
Quote:
The difference between theory and application is that in theory, theory and application are the same; In application, they are not.
Reply With Quote
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-11-2012, 20:43
maddoctor90's Avatar
maddoctor90 maddoctor90 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Matt
FRC #2481 (Roboteers)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Tremont
Posts: 79
maddoctor90 is a splendid one to beholdmaddoctor90 is a splendid one to beholdmaddoctor90 is a splendid one to beholdmaddoctor90 is a splendid one to beholdmaddoctor90 is a splendid one to beholdmaddoctor90 is a splendid one to beholdmaddoctor90 is a splendid one to behold
Re: What's the verdict of on-robot cameras?

I was more or less curious about the $400 rule applying then actually wanting to put our camera on the robot. The camera we access to is expensive because it is built for extreme industrial conditions. I think with a little common sense it would be fine.
Reply With Quote
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-11-2012, 22:22
synth3tk's Avatar
synth3tk synth3tk is offline
Volunteer / The Blue Alliance
AKA: David Thomas
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,005
synth3tk has a reputation beyond reputesynth3tk has a reputation beyond reputesynth3tk has a reputation beyond reputesynth3tk has a reputation beyond reputesynth3tk has a reputation beyond reputesynth3tk has a reputation beyond reputesynth3tk has a reputation beyond reputesynth3tk has a reputation beyond reputesynth3tk has a reputation beyond reputesynth3tk has a reputation beyond reputesynth3tk has a reputation beyond repute
Re: What's the verdict of on-robot cameras?

That makes a lot more sense, then. I just wanted to make sure you didn't duct tape your team's fragile reward from the last ten bake sales to a machine being put into a violent situation.
__________________
Quote:
The difference between theory and application is that in theory, theory and application are the same; In application, they are not.
Reply With Quote
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-11-2012, 00:12
Tytus Gerrish's Avatar
Tytus Gerrish Tytus Gerrish is offline
IGAB, ADHD, and Dislexic
AKA: Ty
FRC #0179 (SwampThing)
Team Role: Tactician
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: West Palm Beach, Florida
Posts: 2,017
Tytus Gerrish has a reputation beyond reputeTytus Gerrish has a reputation beyond reputeTytus Gerrish has a reputation beyond reputeTytus Gerrish has a reputation beyond reputeTytus Gerrish has a reputation beyond reputeTytus Gerrish has a reputation beyond reputeTytus Gerrish has a reputation beyond reputeTytus Gerrish has a reputation beyond reputeTytus Gerrish has a reputation beyond reputeTytus Gerrish has a reputation beyond reputeTytus Gerrish has a reputation beyond repute
Re: What's the verdict of on-robot cameras?

I lost my GoPro in the Atlantic ocean. smashed by robot is not as bad.

and cooler
Reply With Quote
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-11-2012, 00:17
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is offline
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 19,814
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: What's the verdict of on-robot cameras?

Quote:
Originally Posted by maddoctor90 View Post
I was more or less curious about the $400 rule applying then actually wanting to put our camera on the robot. The camera we access to is expensive because it is built for extreme industrial conditions. I think with a little common sense it would be fine.
Yes, it would apply. The camera goes through inspection with the robot, and is therefore to be considered as part of the robot. (Note: Just because the camera is considered as part of the robot does not mean it has to be present on the robot in every match.) As I recall, GoPros are less than $400--but the extreme industrial conditions camera probably would be a *little* bit more.
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk

Reply With Quote
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-11-2012, 10:12
Unsung FIRST Hero
Al Skierkiewicz Al Skierkiewicz is offline
Broadcast Eng/Chief Robot Inspector
AKA: Big Al WFFA 2005
FRC #0111 (WildStang)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Wheeling, IL
Posts: 10,795
Al Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond repute
Re: What's the verdict of on-robot cameras?

I see the cost limit a little differently. Since the camera we are discussing is generally not a permanent part of the robot and is used for recording only (not live video), I see it as a "non-functional" decoration. As a temporary decoration, it is hard to claim it must fit in the budget restrictions for functional parts of the robot. It is included in the weight since it does change that part of the robot when installed.
__________________
Good Luck All. Learn something new, everyday!
Al
WB9UVJ
www.wildstang.org
________________________
Storming the Tower since 1996.
Reply With Quote
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 14-11-2012, 09:23
ToddF's Avatar
ToddF ToddF is offline
mechanical engineer
AKA: Todd Ferrante
FRC #2363 (Triple Helix)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 600
ToddF has a reputation beyond reputeToddF has a reputation beyond reputeToddF has a reputation beyond reputeToddF has a reputation beyond reputeToddF has a reputation beyond reputeToddF has a reputation beyond reputeToddF has a reputation beyond reputeToddF has a reputation beyond reputeToddF has a reputation beyond reputeToddF has a reputation beyond reputeToddF has a reputation beyond repute
Re: What's the verdict of on-robot cameras?

Al,
Would you have any pull with the rules committee that might allow your view on this to be written into the rules? It would help eliminate any controversy during robot inspections.

I tried to mount a Kodak playsport on our robot two years ago, and was told by the lead inspector at the event that it would require a call to national headquarters to approve a special waiver.
__________________
Todd F.
mentor, FIRST team 2363, Triple Helix
Photo gallery
video channel
Triple Helix mobile

Last edited by ToddF : 14-11-2012 at 09:25.
Reply With Quote
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-04-2013, 15:40
Pendulum^-1's Avatar
Pendulum^-1 Pendulum^-1 is offline
Mentor
AKA: Jim Grove
FRC #1915 (Firebird Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 82
Pendulum^-1 is just really nicePendulum^-1 is just really nicePendulum^-1 is just really nicePendulum^-1 is just really nice
Re: What's the verdict of on-robot cameras?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ksafin View Post
What cams have you guys used?
We use GoPro HD Hero Naked.
http://gopro.com/cameras/hd-hero-naked-camera/
Got an extra battery pack for the back and a 32 GB chip. That allows 4 hours of battery, and 6 hours of storage.

Looks like it may be discontinued, as GoPro.com does not carry it anymore. Great thing about the HD Hero Naked is that it is NOT wi-fi capable.
__________________
Jim Grove, Mentor
firebirds1915.blogspot.com
(2007-2017) 1915, McKinley Tech HS, Washington, DC
(2009) 2932, Mid-Pac Institute, Honolulu, HI (Rookie Season)
(2011) 2425, Hillsborough HS, Tampa, FL
(2013-2015) 4464, College Park, MD, 2013 Rookie All Star Winner and 2014 Regional Champions, Washington, DC

FIRST is not rocket science. But it is like drinking from a fire hose.
Reply With Quote
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-04-2013, 11:46
TedG's Avatar
TedG TedG is offline
CAD, Design & Graphics Support
AKA: Team supporter and enthusiast
FRC #0133 (BERT 133)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Standish, Maine
Posts: 150
TedG will become famous soon enough
Re: What's the verdict of on-robot cameras?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tytus Gerrish View Post
done it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6RTgHKxjS3s

as long as it doesn't transmit it's fine.
That was neat... made me sort of dizzy though

__________________
Bonny Eagle Robotics Team - BERT 133
2009-2010: Mentor, 2010-2013 Advisor/Mentor, 2013-Present: Mentor/Cad & Graphics Support

2010 - GSR: Excellence in Website Design
2011 - GSR: Motorola Quality Award
2012 - Mainely Spirit: Spirit Award, Human Player Award- GSR: Gracious Professionalism Award, Quarterfinalist- Beantown Blitz: Finalist
2013 - Mainely Spirit: Sportsmanship Award- GSR: Semifinalist, Woodie Flowers Award- PTR: Semifinalist- Beantown Blitz: Semifinalist
2014 - GSD: Spirit Award, 5th seed, Semi Finalists- PTD: 2nd seed, Finalists
2015 - Safety Animation 1st Place Award, PTD: Excellence in Engineering Award, 8th seed, Finalists, UNHD: Spirit Award, 9th seed, 6th seed Finalist Alliance Captain; Event Winner
2016 - NSD: Industrial Design Award, 3rd seed, Semifinalist- PTD: Excellence in Engineering Award, 2nd seed, Event Winner

Opinions expressed here are mine alone, and not necessarily of the team.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:38.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi