|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Beginner CNC Mill Comparison
I wanted to get a feel for who here on CD has used any of the following mills:
1) http://www.tormach.com/store/index.p...w&ref=PCNC1100 2) http://www.cncmasters.com/index.php?...ical-knee-mill 3) http://www.smithy.com/cnc/1240-mill/pricing#tab-2 4) http://www.microkinetics.com/express/ These are four we have narrowed down which are within our price range. We looked into used machines as well but I believe the school cannot allow us to do this. Anyway, I was looking for feedback on any of these. I have been at CNCzone all day so I know that Tormach is favored by far among the three here. The CNC Masters machine only has an automated quill, so this only gives me limited travel, however the length of the bed is tempting. Are Tormachs manufactured in the US? Does the quality of the machine live up to the hype? How easy is it to learn? Is setting up longer parts in multiple operations easy (drivetrain plates/tubes)? I haven't seen much about the Smithy. The MK seems ok but I haven't heard much else about them on CNCZone. Advice and feedback is much appreciated for someone new to CNC machines. Last edited by Akash Rastogi : 20-11-2012 at 18:38. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Beginner CNC Mill Comparison
I have used a a 1100 series Tormach quite extensively over the summer to do our new bot, literally every piece was done on the Tormach. The machine ran fine without issues for the most part, some of the TTS stuff is a bit iffy but overall it is a nice machine. Also having the ATC/Power Draw bar option gives it a nice upgrade path.
The Tormach is designed in the USA but is made in China to keep costs down. The Mach 3 control software is really easy to learn/use [imo] and doing rails and stuff on the machine was not an issue. The most limiting factor is probably the bed size, compared to say a Bridgeport that can do an entire rail in one go. I am sure RC/Cory could chip in more info. ![]() Edit: Just remembered these guys, heard good things about them. http://www.ihcnc.com/pages/cnc-mill.php Last edited by Mk.32 : 20-11-2012 at 18:41. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Beginner CNC Mill Comparison
Here's another thread from 07 discussing these same brands...
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...ad.php?t=57937 |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Beginner CNC Mill Comparison
I know one team that has a Tormach. They had a serious flaw in the casting and grinding of their first one, but the replacement they've told me has been good and they've used it quite extensively.
If you're able to afford it, look into HAAS. There's no comparison. The Tormach is fine, but the HAAS is just so much more of a machine. If there is any possible way you can save up or get other funding to afford something like a HAAS, that's the route I would go. None of those machines you linked look bad. The MikroKinetics one has a slower spindle speed though, that will be a limiting factor in how fast you cut (along with the lesser rigidity of the machine). I'd opt for one that will let you do flood coolant. If you do go with the Tormach, can you afford the Automatic Tool Changer for it, or at least the power drawbar? Last edited by sanddrag : 20-11-2012 at 22:15. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Beginner CNC Mill Comparison
We just got a Tormach 1100 this summer - I haven't had a ton of time to run parts on it, but it's pretty capable for the work we're throwing at it. Holds around 0.001-0.0005 in circular interpolation with not much effort - so press-fit bearings are easy. That's about as precise as we need it to be. It's certainly not near the class of a Haas, but it's not in that price range either. For milling mainly aluminum and plastics (polycarb/delrin/hdpe/uhmw), it's well suited. It's not going to be driving a 4" face mill, but at reasonable speeds/MRR's, I've been happy with it.
Anything bigger than the machine travels we can farm out to sponsor CNC/waterjet, but it will let us do the majority of our smaller work in house, and it lets our PLTW classes have a better machine to work with. You're welcome to come by and check the machine out anytime, just shoot me a PM. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Beginner CNC Mill Comparison
I've been using a pcnc 1100 daily at work for about 8 months now. I use it primarily in combination with a 4th axis table. Because of volume constraints caused by the 4th axis, I don't have the ATC, but am budgeting for the power drawbar.
I've been very pleased. The machine and TTS stuff have been trouble free, although I've found the packaged CAM software, Sprutcam, to be pretty poor. It generates tool paths alright, but it's been buggy and difficult to learn. There are just better options. The new version may be a step up, but it'd be hard to believe. To Tormachs credit, they've published a lot of helpful tutorials for sprutcam, which is interesting since it isn't really a Tormach product. If you do go with the Tormach, spend the extra money on the nice machine stand with a coolant tank and chip guards. It's completely worth it. I'd also rank one of the 'machine arms', that will hold onto a monitor and keyboard tray to be a must have. The TTS stuff is expensive but works as advertised and worthwhile. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Beginner CNC Mill Comparison
Let me just add on that even ten $100,000 mills with five axis and automatic tool changers are useless without a couple of extra critical pieces. First, you have to have a few students who can actually run the thing. If you only trust one mentor to run it, they will end up spending all their time watching the mill run. This is often a poor use of their time. Make sure that you trust a few students to do the watching, and let the mentor worry about potentially more important things. Also, students who are trained on the machine and know it's capabilities make much better mechanical designers.
Second, get good CAM software. I find that the CAD to G-Code step often takes much longer than the G-Code to cut metal phase. We have BobCAD v24, and I really wouldn't recommend it. It's ostensibly a 3d package, but is terribly unintuitive to use. I've had to learn how to use it about four times, because it's so hard to remember how to use it. I've heard good reviews of MasterCAM and Mach 3, but never had a chance to use them. No matter what CAM software you choose, have multiple students be able to crank out G-Code. In terms of actual machines, we have a small HAAS with an ATC, and it really is as awesome as everyone says. However, it was about $40,000, so it is a sizable chunk of change over what you are looking for. It holds tolerances to about .0001", and has fast spindle and cutting speeds. The user interface is pretty nice too. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Beginner CNC Mill Comparison
For another entry level machine choice, take a look at the Taig mill. You can start off with this and eventually upgrade to a larger machine and keep the Taig to build additional parts. These machines are impressive for the price, the table travel is comparable to the Tormach, the spindle speed is 2X.
Run it with Mach3 and use Cut 2D for cam. |
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Beginner CNC Mill Comparison
Quote:
1323 (kinda) owns a Tormach and we've spent a ton of money on it. Got it for 25k with everything and then we've probably invested 5-6k on it (All school money, machine was paid for by the Shop Classes). And this is without the ATC which came out after we bought it. Out of all the machines listed on the initial post, its the best to get (besides the HAAS, which is better), but we have mixed feelings about it (more negative that positive). I wish the school would have gotten a smaller HAAS or something different. If your spending ~10-20k of non-team money, go for it. But if your spending team money or 25k plus, don't buy any of those machines. Go with something better or go with a manual with a power draw bar/dro. If you have someone that understands CNC machines, take a look at used machines. You can get some solid deals there. I'd recommend getting MasterCAM for Solidworks or MasterCAM standalone (harder for kids). We recently tried MasterCAM for Solidworks X6 after disliking the x4 version, its pretty solid. Very inuitive and seriously a whole lot easier to teach kids on. Also allows you to update toolpaths as you rebuild your models/change dimensions. -RC Last edited by R.C. : 21-11-2012 at 23:02. |
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Beginner CNC Mill Comparison
Quote:
I would consider our Haas to be of slightly lesser quality than others that I have used/heard of and we can usually get within .0003" (as measured on the machine with it's probe...so not at all a proper means of measurement). In reality I would guess .0005 is the tightest tolerance we can hold without babysitting the machine and changing offsets. Last edited by Cory : 21-11-2012 at 00:48. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Beginner CNC Mill Comparison
Thanks for the feedback so far guys. While I was researching, I was already highly biased towards the Tormach machines, so your accounts are no surprise at all.
Cory - are there Haas machines available in the 20-25K range? Any other comparable machines within this range? I'll get back to you about if it would be team money or school money, but at the moment I'm sure it is school money paying for the machine and we are limited to around 12-13K Along with the 1100, I was thinking the 4th axis would be the best addition. Anything else you guys would suggest? Possibly a power drawbar as well. |
|
#12
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Beginner CNC Mill Comparison
Quote:
I'd rather have the TM-1 with no toolchanger for 26k than a Tormach with toolchanger. There's a lot out there on the used market, but Haas is the only commodity machine I know of that you can get new for that price. Last edited by Cory : 21-11-2012 at 01:46. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Beginner CNC Mill Comparison
Quote:
I use the Tormach sourced 4th axis on my 1100. It works, and for what I do it works very well. However, it has some drawbacks. For one, it takes up a lot of room in an already small work envelope. I'm making really tiny stuff, so that's not an issue for me, but keep in mind that the 1100 has 18" of X travel to start with, and the 4th gobbles up a bunch of that. In most setups it precludes the use of the ATC. It's also relatively slow; in my work it's usually the limiting factor in feeds/speeds. Set up/take down is a bit of a pain, as it weighs a ton and seeps oil, but you may find you have to do it frequently to make room for 'normal' work. You also have to think a bit about backlash- it's driven by a stepper, and a lot of direction reversals will start to accumulate some positioning error if you aren't careful to keep the backlash adjusted. On the upside, it is a real deal 4th axis for not a huge amount of money, and you can purchase it any time after the mill. If you have a really good case for using it, go for it, but I doubt it'd be a reasonable return for a FIRST team. I bought it with a specific need and, half a year later or so, it's just starting to really pay for its self. For school/FIRST use, the power drawbar would be a lot more useful. The ATC even more so. More tool holders and/or tooling is even better then either. If you haven't already, check out Tormachs paper on the 1100's design decisions. I think they make a credible case for the machines size and capabilities, and it's nice to see a company publish this kind of in depth stuff. http://www.tormach.com/engineering_pcnc1100.html |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Beginner CNC Mill Comparison
Quote:
A HAAS Mini Mill can be had for just under $30k if you're a school. You can get into a HAAS Toolroom mill (which gives you great travels and workspace) for probably just over $25k, but it has no tool changer (unless you get the more expensive "P" model). I would have a hard time recommending a machine without a tool changer if one is available. It's just too important of an option to pass up if it is available. For CAM software, you may be interested in HSM Express for Solidworks. It looks very good and is free. One interesting note is that HSMWorks is getting bought out by Autodesk oddly enough. I envision good things to come from this in the next 3 years. For now, we're enjoying OneCNC XR5 so far. There are many free training videos available and we've only had minor hiccups in the learning curve. Although it's less popular than MasterCAM, it seems every bit as powerful and just as easy to use. It has great simulation graphics. The OneCNC West reseller has been fantastic and the educational pricing can't be beat. Also, once you own it, you own it. No annual fee. Finally, In some sense I like the fact that it's a standalone program. I'm curious if any teams with CNC mills have used them to run jobs for customers to generate income for the team. Last edited by sanddrag : 21-11-2012 at 01:22. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Beginner CNC Mill Comparison
Quote:
I'll be sure to pass this onto the team admin. Hopefully saving up for 30K+ is a possibility. I'm sure that for them a larger 1 time investment is better than continuously putting money into a Tormach or any other lower end machine. Thanks for all the info guys! Last edited by Akash Rastogi : 21-11-2012 at 01:46. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|