|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
How many servos can be powered off a single PWM terminal on the Sidecar?
I found this answer from 2009: http://forums.usfirst.org/showthread.php?t=11822
I'm wondering if this is still the case. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How many servos can be powered off a single PWM terminal on the Sidecar?
As far as I'm aware. One device per port tends to be the standard.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How many servos can be powered off a single PWM terminal on the Sidecar?
I couldn't find a rule that explicitly ruled in one direction or the other.
R54 was the closest I could find: Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How many servos can be powered off a single PWM terminal on the Sidecar?
Eric- is it correct to assume that the DC power pins on the PWM ports are all supplied by the same source? In other words, is there any performance difference between using a Y cable or separate ports for each servo (possible signal issues aside)?
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How many servos can be powered off a single PWM terminal on the Sidecar?
Quote:
I haven't tested signal effects, but most servos are not opto-isolated and therefore don't consume measurable signal current. * Assuming that extra cable length is 50mOhms and 800mA draw at stall, you losing 40mV above what you would with separate power pins, which amounts to less than a 1% performance difference - and this is an extremely conservative estimate. I would imagine that it would be swamped by measurement accuracy and part-to-part variability. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|