|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Northwest Rankings
I applied the FiM ranking system to teams in the Northwest over the course of the regional season. This includes the 179 teams in Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Montana and Alaska.
I included every team from the Northwest, even if they competed in event(s) outside of the Northwest. It's exciting to see the top 64 teams who would have gone to the Northwest Championship, if we were already following a district model. I can't wait for a regional championship! Here's the scoring system, from the FiM Rules Supplement: Code:
POINT CATEGORY POINTS POINTS Win-Loss Record in Qualifying Rounds Win 2 Tie 1 Final Alliance Captains After Picking #1 Alliance Captain 16 #2 Alliance Captain 15 #3 Alliance Captain down to #8 Alliance Captain 14 down to 9 Draft Order by Acceptance #1 Draft Pick (Accepted) 16 #2 Draft Pick (Accepted) 15 #3Draft Pick down to #16 Draft Pick 14 down to 1 Elimination Round Performance Winning Alliance Teams: Alliance Captain and First Pick 30 Second Pick 24 Finalist Alliance Teams: Alliance Captain and First Pick 20 Second Pick 16 Semi Finalist Alliance Teams: Alliance Captain and First Pick 10 Second Pick 8 Awards Industrial Design 5 Quality 5 Excellence in Engineering 5 Innovation in Control 5 Creativity 5 Entrepreneurship 5 Team Spirit 2 Gracious Professionalism 2 Imagery 2 Highest Rookie Seed 2 Industrial Safety 2 Judges Award 2 Rookie Inspiration 2 Code:
Rank Teams Points 1 2471 124 2 1983 120 3 948 108 4 360 96 5 2130 93 6 1425 92 7 1899 89 8 3663 87 9 3145 84 10 1318 76 11 955 71 12 1595 70 13 2557 68 14 2046 65 15 2907 65 16 2928 63 17 4089 60 18 1569 56 19 2733 56 20 3812 56 21 1891 54 22 3711 54 23 1540 53 24 3789 52 25 4061 52 26 4579 52 27 2930 50 28 2374 47 29 4205 47 30 2605 44 31 488 43 32 753 42 33 2635 42 34 3219 42 35 4125 42 36 2147 41 37 4106 41 38 3131 40 39 4127 38 40 997 37 41 2122 37 42 2990 37 43 3826 37 44 2412 36 45 492 35 46 2522 35 47 2594 35 48 3968 33 49 2922 32 50 2811 31 51 4488 29 52 1258 28 53 3238 28 54 1691 27 55 2517 27 56 3251 26 57 4086 26 58 1510 25 59 3216 25 60 3681 25 61 4030 24 62 4681 24 63 847 23 64 3693 23 65 956 22 66 1294 22 67 1359 22 68 2929 22 69 3483 22 70 3588 21 71 4512 21 72 4772 21 73 2923 20 74 2944 20 75 4077 20 76 2976 19 77 3574 19 78 4542 19 79 2411 18 80 4057 18 81 4060 17 82 1566 16 83 2910 16 84 3562 16 85 3860 14 86 4495 14 87 4513 14 88 1695 12 89 1696 12 90 2093 12 91 2926 12 92 3220 12 93 3315 12 94 3587 12 95 3787 12 96 4038 12 97 4120 12 98 4461 12 99 4692 12 100 3674 11 101 568 10 102 957 10 103 1432 10 104 1778 10 105 2002 10 106 2555 10 107 3268 10 108 3393 10 109 3684 10 110 3712 10 111 3781 10 112 3801 10 113 3995 10 114 4043 10 115 4082 10 116 4309 10 117 4450 10 118 4520 10 119 4662 10 120 4682 10 121 2521 9 122 2542 9 123 949 8 124 2148 8 125 2149 8 126 2192 8 127 2550 8 128 2903 8 129 2906 8 130 2927 8 131 3223 8 132 3286 8 133 3586 8 134 3813 8 135 4132 8 136 4173 8 137 4175 8 138 4180 8 139 4560 8 140 4654 8 141 4683 8 142 3576 7 143 3786 7 144 4469 7 145 1571 6 146 2660 6 147 2898 6 148 2915 6 149 3024 6 150 3070 6 151 3192 6 152 3221 6 153 3636 6 154 3673 6 155 3876 6 156 4104 6 157 4110 6 158 4178 6 159 4304 6 160 4457 6 161 4548 6 162 4559 6 163 4608 6 164 4726 6 165 2942 4 166 2980 4 167 3049 4 168 3513 4 169 3662 4 170 4051 4 171 4105 4 172 4131 4 173 4652 4 174 3575 3 175 3218 2 176 3831 2 177 1544 0 178 1823 0 179 3237 0 Those would be as follows: Code:
3 spots – one for each of the three State Championship Chairman’s Award winners 3 spots – one for each of the three teams making up the winning alliance at the State Championship 1 spot – for the State Championship Rookie All-Star Award winner 1 spot – for the State Championship Engineering Inspiration Award winner The remaining 16 qualifying spots will be filled by starting at the top of the re-computed rankings and moving down as far as is necessary to fill the nineteen spots, skipping over teams that are already eligible or scheduled to attend. Let me know if you find any errors. * I didn't apply tie-breaking rules as it didn't effect the outcome of who would qualify and I'm tired. ** I only used each team's first two competitions, so 1983's score of 68 in Spokane was ignored. Last edited by Navid Shafa : 08-04-2013 at 01:10. |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Northwest Rankings
Oh, man... and I thought I spent too much time on CD!
Awesome analysis, though... it would be fun to see what a tournament with the top 64 teams from that list would look like. Jason |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Northwest Rankings
I needed something to do on the bus ride to and from Spokane
![]() |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Northwest Rankings
Well done in Spokane, Navid... Three regionals, three wins - but never the alliance captain... A strange record for a great team.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Northwest Rankings
Quote:
![]() |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Northwest Rankings
Of course.... Was it just me, or was alliance selection strange? Why did 2130 pass you guys up? I see 4061 had very strong qualifiers, but we all know that you had better have a very good reason for passing on the skunks!
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Northwest Rankings
How many teams in the PNW were 1 event vs. 2 event teams this year?
I can't wait for the District model. More matches at more events will be better for everyone. Also it would be super cool if they could be at places with a softer floor than the concrete at the WaMu Theater, because my back was all kinds of messed up after 3 days on that. ![]() |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Northwest Rankings
Quote:
-47 teams of the 179 went to two regional events (including 1983 who attended 3 events). I am also looking forward to districts. I would love to see the number of 2 event teams go up. This will only increase competitive play in our region and allow teams to better utilize their funds. The nice part about having tons of district events will mean smaller competitions, and hopefully more comfortable venues ![]() |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Northwest Rankings
I'm definitely looking forward to the district model too. More events, more matches, more competitive, less travel, less cost... the best of the Northwest facing off in our own championship! what's not to like?
I guess the qualifying for the world championship in week 7 could create some logistic problems... travel arrangements, airfare, hotels, etc... |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Northwest Rankings
That is awesome. I'm glad to see we are ranked 51st with only 1 event. Districts is going to make this region excellent.
Something I do hope they do is if the entire system moves to districts is I hope they push championships back. Because at that point everyone would qualify week 7, and it would be really tough to find travel. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Northwest Rankings
Quote:
We wanted a strong full-court shooter on our alliance. We knew Alpha+ was good at both that and pyramid shooting, but they were short and easy to block and we didn't want another pyramid shooter like us. Having two pyramid shooter's often causes delays while waiting to share the spot. I think both Alliances got what they needed and I was almost sure that 2130 and 4061 would be battling us in the finals after their high-scoring match. We won our last two regionals with FCS bots and if it ain't broke, don't fix it. It was really nice that 2471 was able to pyramid shoot too, because some tough defense and FCS blocking was inevitable in Spokane. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Northwest Rankings
Quote:
We had indications that Skunks were going to turn us down. Our scouting team also liked the combo shooters strategy and 4061 had great stats. Their team is very well run and we will be seeing lots from them. See ya in St Louis |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Northwest Rankings
Don't be fooled by 1540's relatively low rank. We fixed all of our jamming and loading problems that we had in Oregon while we were in Oklahoma, and even put up 93 points on our own in the following semi-final match:
http://www.thebluealliance.com/match/2013okok_sf2m1 (and we'll be tuning our 7-disc auto and adding a 10 point climb before champs) |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Northwest Rankings
Quote:
Team 2130 is a class act and so is 4061. i would expect to see both of these teams continually improving and they are both pretty darn good right now!! We look forward to being able to play together with 2130 in both St. Louis and the years to come. They are a fine team and everyone should expect great things from them in the future. Thanks 2471 for coming through in the elimination rounds... it was fun playing with you for once instead of against you. It was the first time. Thanks 4125 for getting through your tech problems and providing a solid third force for the alliance. It was quite a ride. The toughest elimination rounds we faced all year. Spokane is a fun place to compete... |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
We really enjoyed being on the same side of the field as Skunkworks this year. It's only my sophomore year as a mentor, but I've been told that we have never played with you in the entire history of the team. That's pretty amazing! Ultimate Scent just gets better and better with every regional. I guess that's an advantage of doing three. The district system will make this possible for many more teams which will be great for our area.
The eliminations, I likened to a Rugby match. Very rough, and very difficult the entire way. There were a number of alliances at Spokane without a tall blocker, but we never saw that match up in our three eliminations. When we got home, we found the software bug that was locking out our driver controls from time to time. Yay! That was very frustrating, and we kept blaming the rough field, along with anything else we could think of. Thanks to Confidential for coming back after a couple of big scares in the quarter finals. We came the closest to going home in that match up, but we all buckled down and got it done somehow. Watching the videos where the skunks were almost pulled over on their side in the finals was amazing and scary. I pretty much missed it live. Navid, I really appreciate you doing the footwork on the Northwest rankings. I'm super into statistics, and when California started calculating theirs here on CD, I was very tempted to do the same for the Northwest, but I never took the time. I'm sure it was significant work. Leaving out your third regional hurts your score. Is that how it's done in Michigan, or do they count all the district events you do, average them, throw out the worst? I really liked the Eastern Washington University facility for the regional. Big enough to hold everyone, but small enough to see it up close. I hope we have a chance to go there in the future. Thanks to everyone for a great time. Now I need a little time for my finger nails to grow back before St. Louis! See ya next time. -Bob |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|