|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
A Message from Bob Tuttle
I just recieved this message and thought I'd share a snipit of it with CD.
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: A Message from Bob Tuttle
Quote:
EDIT: Corrected my dumb math mistake to prevent confusion for future thread readers Last edited by Moriarty : 30-04-2013 at 22:05. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: A Message from Bob Tuttle
My math says 25% of 8 is 2 which would mean 10 matches.
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: A Message from Bob Tuttle
Still great. A few years ago they vowed to give a minimum of 10 matches, which prompted the move to starting qualification matches on Thursday. I'm glad to see an effort to get this back.
The other points are also good. Shorter closing ceremonies are long overdue |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: A Message from Bob Tuttle
I like this a lot. FIRST seems to be continuously striving to better the program. Very inspiring.
|
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: A Message from Bob Tuttle
Maybe there will be 4 robots per alliance! Chief Delphi Community, do you think that's stretching it a bit?
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: A Message from Bob Tuttle
I think it's real awesome FIRST goes through all this efforts to improve. I haven't been with FIRST for a long time, only three years, but I still can definitely see the difference between the way FIRST ran when I joined in 2011 and the way it runs now. Nowadays, with the new people in charge, and especially Frank, I feel a lot more involved in the organisation, even without doing anything related to it's management. I also really appreciate FIRST's guts in making all of the changes that were made this year, and surprised they all went well.
Quote:
This is for another thread though... If you want and have the mental powers to search through 700+ posts, I remember a discussion about this in this year's game hint thread. Last edited by bardd : 30-04-2013 at 16:11. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/ Good, But Should Be Better
What if they had two fields for each division. So when one match finished they next match started. This would require more space, people, a well thought out schedule to be successful.
|
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
**FIRST EMAIL**/ Good, But Should Be Better
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/ Good, But Should Be Better
I really love the direction FIRST is headed.
Thank you FIRST! |
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/ Good, But Should Be Better
With Frank and Bob at the helm, we are really headed in a good direction
![]() |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/ Good, But Should Be Better
Also, I love how amazingly blunt this email is. There is no beating around the bush with anything, no excuses (other than the rain obviously). This is really cool to see. He states the issues like they are, and then states what needs to change. Just plain cool.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/ Good, But Should Be Better
I wish all organizations were this open.
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/ Good, But Should Be Better
To get more matches without being really frantic next years game needs to have an easy reset. This year that seemed to be the biggest issue with the number of matches that we had.
Big Time consuming things this year: Counting the frisbees Getting climbing robots down |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/ Good, But Should Be Better
Quote:
Reset time was the big factor in determining the number of matches at regional events and CMP this year. I'm confident that they will consider this for next years game. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|